https://github.com/Endilll commented:
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hip-vega20` running
on `hip-vega20-0` while building `clang` at step 3 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/17410
Here is the relevant piece of the build log fo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 7 "Add check check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/21073
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-x86_64-windows`
running on `minipc-ryzen-win` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/166/builds/929
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang`
running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/25124
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ppc64-flang-aix` running
on `ppc64-flang-aix-test` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/201/builds/4067
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-rel-assert`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-rel-assert` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/29/builds/
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-dylib`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-dylib` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/50/builds/12694
He
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135469
>From 1607a76c4fd2bd7f0c4e834d2935668d51daf55f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 00:47:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add builtin_get_vtable_pointer and
virtual_member_address
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/28655
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-out-of-tree`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-out-of-tree` while building `clang` at step 9
"test-build-flang-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135530
When emitting the jump for e.g. a for loop condition, we used to jump out of
the CondScope, leaving the scope initialized, because we skipped the
corresponding Destroy opcode. If that loop was in a loop itself
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
When emitting the jump for e.g. a for loop condition, we used to jump out of
the CondScope, leaving the scope initialized, because we skipped the
corresponding Destroy opcode. If that loop was in a loop itse
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-latest-gcc`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-latest-gcc` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/130/builds
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-sharedlibs`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-sharedlibs` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/80/builds/
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-release`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-release` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-flang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/172/builds/11858
@@ -3231,6 +3241,230 @@ static QualType builtinCommonTypeImpl(Sema &S,
TemplateName BaseTemplate,
}
}
+static QualType CopyCV(QualType From, QualType To) {
+ if (From.isConstQualified())
+To.addConst();
+ if (From.isVolatileQualified())
+To.addVolatile();
+ retur
arsenm wrote:
> I might misunderstand it but based on your comment, it doesn't sound like the
> issue is with using `byref` for aggregate arguments in OpenCL (which is what
> this PR is trying to do), especially since OpenCL is currently the only
> language not using it. We already use it for
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/6915
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
Author: Sean Perry
Date: 2025-04-13T03:04:58-07:00
New Revision: 84666d68740bea9eee19399ab5c8622ff2f6e9ca
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/84666d68740bea9eee19399ab5c8622ff2f6e9ca
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/84666d68740bea9eee19399ab5c8622ff2f6e9ca.diff
LO
https://github.com/rnk closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rnk wrote:
I just happened to look into the implementation of AutoConvert.h, and I see the
entire interface is defined away when not targeting zOS. This means that all
call sites need to be conditional on `ifdef __MVS__`, which means we have ugly
ifdef droppings all over the codebase, which ha
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135530
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-04-13T12:25:29+02:00
New Revision: 09588e93bbe486ce782de9fba604f5cd184ec446
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09588e93bbe486ce782de9fba604f5cd184ec446
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09588e93bbe486ce782de9fba604f5cd184ec446.diff
L
jplehr wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hip-vega20`
> running on `hip-vega20-0` while building `clang` at step 3 "annotate".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/17410
>
> Here is the relevant piece of the
arsenm wrote:
> Hi, in this bot it is not the flang test that is failing but some HIP blender
> test. Also in https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/207/builds/1994 this
> produces undefined_reference errors.
Is this bot using an antique device libs?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
jplehr wrote:
This should be device libs from ROCm 6.3.3.
```
$ apt show rocm-device-libs
Package: rocm-device-libs
Version: 1.0.0.60303-74~22.04
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: ROCm Compiler Support
Installed-Size: 3424 kB
Depends: rocm-core
Homepage: https://github.com/RadeonOpe
https://github.com/arsenm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134753
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vbvictor wrote:
Ping, appreciate it if someone will take a look at these changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134375
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135511
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135548
We used to accept c++ as a known value here, causing wrong codegen.
>From a64e39a20719b89dd946f404e83d32026f8db377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:25:28 +
https://github.com/shiltian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We used to accept c++ as a known value here, causing wrong codegen.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135548.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.h (+5)
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/epistax updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
>From 6fe4155fad0cdbc6ca04e37df143f22f537d5514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cody
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [cindex] Add support for calling getFullyQualifiedName to
the
Author: Shilei Tian
Date: 2025-04-13T10:17:55-04:00
New Revision: ce01e4e2f6cb2a1c37e3acceeac931b2031a02e8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce01e4e2f6cb2a1c37e3acceeac931b2031a02e8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce01e4e2f6cb2a1c37e3acceeac931b2031a02e8.diff
L
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-win`
running on `as-builder-10` while building `clang` at step 17
"test-check-lldb-api".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/197/builds/3938
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/YutongZhuu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
>From ca795c3f27e37ad8a8f165a3b10e9415cbfd66a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yutong Zhu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:32:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Improved the -Wtautological-overlap-compare diagnostics
to
https://github.com/Lancern created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135552
This PR introduces support for calling functions with a scalar return type to
the upstream. This PR also includes an initial version of `CIRGenTargetInfo`
and related definitions which are essential for the CIR
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
This PR introduces support for calling functions with a scalar return type to
the upstream. This PR also includes an initial version of `CIRGenTargetInfo`
and related definitions which are essential for the CI
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sirui Mu (Lancern)
Changes
This PR introduces support for calling functions with a scalar return type to
the upstream. This PR also includes an initial version of `CIRGenTargetInfo`
and related definitions which are essential for the CIRG
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135548
>From d26fc41fbfcb7c6c3159e3a7314d84c2ce2785b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:25:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Reject constexpr-unknown poin
Lancern wrote:
The CI failure on code formatting seems to be a problem in the code formatter
script itself rather than in the patch content.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-04-13T09:01:37-07:00
New Revision: 5f11d64cfb44fc0adf3d3235b0e480d930379e9d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f11d64cfb44fc0adf3d3235b0e480d930379e9d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5f11d64cfb44fc0adf3d3235b0e480d930379e9d.diff
LOG:
@@ -80,13 +80,46 @@ void ExceptionEscapeCheck::check(const
MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
if (!MatchedDecl)
return;
- if (Tracer.analyze(MatchedDecl).getBehaviour() ==
- utils::ExceptionAnalyzer::State::Throwing)
-// FIXME: We should provide more informat
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135516
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-04-13T09:02:46-07:00
New Revision: c41ef751f85ee42f40380d064f44cfd347fb6215
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c41ef751f85ee42f40380d064f44cfd347fb6215
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c41ef751f85ee42f40380d064f44cfd347fb6215.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:
What about unknown exceptions ?
Take a look into https://reviews.llvm.org/D153298, mainly into comments and
approach if everything is covered in your change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134375
___
c
@@ -28,6 +29,12 @@ class ExceptionAnalyzer {
///< definition.
};
+ /// We use a SetVector to preserve the order of the functions in the call
+ /// stack as well as have fast lookup.
+ using CallStack = llvm::SetVector,
+
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134375
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134753
>From a988ecf63dc79d226c2f7aa1430f65d08256888b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 00:20:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Re-order & adapt `hipstdpar` specific passes.
---
clang/lib/Co
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134753
>From a988ecf63dc79d226c2f7aa1430f65d08256888b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 00:20:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Re-order & adapt `hipstdpar` specific passes.
---
clang/lib/Co
Author: Daniel Chen
Date: 2025-04-13T09:22:31-04:00
New Revision: 1264d7a53a4de3094672be2a248db57b213f33ac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1264d7a53a4de3094672be2a248db57b213f33ac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1264d7a53a4de3094672be2a248db57b213f33ac.diff
L
https://github.com/DanielCChen closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsenm wrote:
> This should be device libs from ROCm 6.3.3.
>
We really need these to be part of the compiler distribution. It doesn't really
work to have this as an imported 3rd party package that's a year old
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134805
Author: Matt Arsenault
Date: 2025-04-13T14:47:39+02:00
New Revision: ccfb97b42174eab118a4e4222c25e986db876563
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccfb97b42174eab118a4e4222c25e986db876563
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccfb97b42174eab118a4e4222c25e986db876563.diff
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ LLVM_19 {
LLVM_20 {
global:
+clang_getFullyQualifiedName;
epistax wrote:
Thanks, I made a new section.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
https://github.com/epistax updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
>From 6fe4155fad0cdbc6ca04e37df143f22f537d5514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cody
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [cindex] Add support for calling getFullyQualifiedName to
the
https://github.com/epistax updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
>From 6fe4155fad0cdbc6ca04e37df143f22f537d5514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cody
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [cindex] Add support for calling getFullyQualifiedName to
the
https://github.com/epistax updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
>From 6fe4155fad0cdbc6ca04e37df143f22f537d5514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cody
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [cindex] Add support for calling getFullyQualifiedName to
the
cor3ntin wrote:
> I just noticed there's no documentation for
> `__builtin_virtual_member_address()` so I'm addressing that.
>
> Due to code drift and time I realized that they disagree as to whether they
> should take `C*` or `C&` so I'm going to make them both accept either
> (existing code
https://github.com/epistax updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135420
>From 6fe4155fad0cdbc6ca04e37df143f22f537d5514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Cody
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [cindex] Add support for calling getFullyQualifiedName to
the
@@ -535,6 +535,28 @@ def test_pretty(self):
pp.set_property(PrintingPolicyProperty.SuppressTagKeyword, False)
self.assertEqual(f.type.get_canonical().pretty_printed(pp), "struct X")
+def test_fully_qualified_name(self):
+source = """
+namesp
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `openmp-s390x-linux`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang,flang` at step 6 "test-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/10376
Here is the relevant piece of the build
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: Firas Khalil Khana (firasuke)
Changes
Hey there,
It seems that `LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_WERROR` defaults to `OFF` according to
[CMakeLists.txt](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libunwind/CMakeLists.txt#L43).
Thanks for your ti
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang,flang` at step 6
"test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/15937
Here is the relevant piece
https://github.com/firasuke created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135546
Hey there,
It seems that `LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_WERROR` defaults to `OFF` according to
[CMakeLists.txt](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libunwind/CMakeLists.txt#L43).
Thanks for your time!
>From 4d
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-04-13T15:46:01+02:00
New Revision: 578ca5e469ef1c91a79aa15bc186921ee7faa855
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/578ca5e469ef1c91a79aa15bc186921ee7faa855
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/578ca5e469ef1c91a79aa15bc186921ee7faa855.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135482
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang,llvm` at step 2
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/14338
Here is the relevant piece
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#135577
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-win` running on `avx512-intel64-win` while building
`clang` at step 4 "cmake stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/6292
Here is the relevant pi
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# XAndesPerf - Andes Performance Extension
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+xandesperf -show-encoding \
+# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-ASM,CHECK-ASM-AND-OBJ %s
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv64 -mattr=+xandesperf < %s \
+# RUN
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# XAndesPerf - Andes Performance Extension
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf -show-encoding \
+# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-ASM,CHECK-ASM-AND-OBJ %s
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf < %s \
+# RU
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# XAndesPerf - Andes Performance Extension
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf -show-encoding \
+# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-ASM,CHECK-ASM-AND-OBJ %s
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf < %s \
+# RU
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# XAndesPerf - Andes Performance Extension
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf -show-encoding \
+# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-ASM,CHECK-ASM-AND-OBJ %s
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv32 -mattr=+xandesperf < %s \
+# RU
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# XAndesPerf - Andes Performance Extension
+# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+xandesperf -show-encoding \
+# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-ASM,CHECK-ASM-AND-OBJ %s
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv64 -mattr=+xandesperf < %s \
+# RUN
https://github.com/wzssyqa closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ShashwathiNavada wrote:
ping @cor3ntin
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125643
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kito-cheng edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135110
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -690,6 +690,23 @@ SmallVector
TemplateParamsReferencedInTemplateArgumentList(
SemaRef.MarkUsedTemplateParameters(
DeducedArgs, TemplateParamsList->getDepth(), ReferencedTemplateParams);
+ auto MarkDefaultArgs = [&](auto *Param) {
+if (!Param || !Param->hasDefa
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@firasuke Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build
Author: Firas Khalil Khana
Date: 2025-04-13T09:41:30-07:00
New Revision: dd107b20daedbc49dc3003ae2cb2e846267c308c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dd107b20daedbc49dc3003ae2cb2e846267c308c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dd107b20daedbc49dc3003ae2cb2e846267c308c.
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135546
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135133
>From aaf5482c91f73431e1290cab640d01f4b3f39692 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:52:36 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] implement printing of canonical expressions
This pat
owenca wrote:
We should stick to the table in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337#discussion_r2028339995 and
deprecate `SFS_InlineOnly`, `SFS_Empty`, and `SFS_Inline`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337
___
cfe-commits mail
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135548
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135546
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-x86_64-windows`
running on `minipc-ryzen-win` while building `clang` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/166/builds/952
Here is the relevant piece of
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-04-13T18:57:55+02:00
New Revision: 974bda8f61e056f90b17baa6db686c91d20ebe9d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/974bda8f61e056f90b17baa6db686c91d20ebe9d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/974bda8f61e056f90b17baa6db686c91d20ebe9d.diff
L
https://github.com/phoebewang milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/irymarchyk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337
>From df25a8bbfd827085265c51a44bedbf38deebbab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Rymarchyk <>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:54:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang-format]: Add `Custom` to `ShortFunctionStyle`;
irymarchyk wrote:
> We should stick to the table in [#134337
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134337#discussion_r2028339995)
> and deprecate `SFS_InlineOnly`, `SFS_Empty`, and `SFS_Inline`.
Thanks, I marked options as 'deprecated'. Mapping is done in Format.cpp.
https://
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129207
>From 679f92557d62acd87bf521050db7c2aee527293a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:09:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Clang: Add minnum/maxnum builtin functions support
With https
@@ -3032,6 +2983,162 @@ int UnwindCursor::stepThroughSigReturn(Registers_s390x &) {
#endif // defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_LINUX_SIGRETURN) &&
// defined(_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN)
+
+#if defined(B_HAIKU_32_BIT)
+typedef Elf32_Sy
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
