https://github.com/loumalouomega updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
From 6c210298a5aab4eeb0d155534d739e21ba315469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Vicente=20Mataix=20Ferr=C3=A1ndiz?=
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:28:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [tool] Remove legacy ar
https://github.com/loumalouomega edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/loumalouomega edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127166
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
I'd like to see a test that checks that it's available in C++23 but not C++20
(with a fixme on this). You can also point me out to an existing one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127166
___
cfe-commits
@@ -510,6 +510,12 @@ C++23 implementation status
Yes
+
+
+(12): In Clang 20, this change is not yet retroactively
Endilll wrote:
```suggestion
(12): This feature is not yet available in C++20 and earlier
modes.
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
vbvictor wrote:
@PiotrZSL, I fixed all your comments and improved check by adding new
`WarnOnUsingAndTypedef` option.
I am still not sure whether It is good to have this option or not.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126434
___
cfe-commits m
metaflow wrote:
> > For what it worth this change made it persistently failing in my setup.
>
> I'm not sure I follow you. The test is disabled on all platforms
> unconditionally on main. Since #127034
yea, I know it was disabled. I meant that this very
55f3df875d3a266c566f593357e2290879f4932
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-14T01:33:17-08:00
New Revision: 5be4536d091d7b927ceaa30a263ab5629f9008cc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5be4536d091d7b927ceaa30a263ab5629f9008cc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5be4536d091d7b927ceaa30a263ab5629f9008cc.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2025-02-14T01:33:51-08:00
New Revision: 1bc2f1c83f417cdbc11d9cfde780d96aa429ca9f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1bc2f1c83f417cdbc11d9cfde780d96aa429ca9f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1bc2f1c83f417cdbc11d9cfde780d96aa429ca9f.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
TiborGY wrote:
@Jolyon0202 Your patch looks valid at first glance, but there is a merge
conflict. Could you resolve that please?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73210
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127117
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Pengcheng Wang
Date: 2025-02-14T17:35:02+08:00
New Revision: 7eadc1960d199676f04add402bb0aa6f65b7b234
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7eadc1960d199676f04add402bb0aa6f65b7b234
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7eadc1960d199676f04add402bb0aa6f65b7b234.diff
https://github.com/wangpc-pp closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120712
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> @zixu-w and @ChuanqiXu9 Just want to clarify policies about changes
> reversion. As far as I understand it was one example in some private codebase
> with no reproducer publicly available. I can understand and completely agree
> if it breaks any existing test or llvm-build
Prabhuk wrote:
More smaller fixes based on @RossComputerGuy's patch:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120632
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/Icohedron updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127137
>From 4fae5642c6e8e305cdc687b4968ba5eabaa44b50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Icohedron
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add the AddUint64 HLSL builtin function
- Defines the AddUint
Author: Arthur Eubanks
Date: 2025-02-14T16:35:16-08:00
New Revision: 28c52edbe33e671ace58309e60598f3342e9ca73
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28c52edbe33e671ace58309e60598f3342e9ca73
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28c52edbe33e671ace58309e60598f3342e9ca73.diff
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126443
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aeubanks wrote:
I believe all concerns have been addressed, will merge now with the approvals.
Happy to follow up on any other concerns.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124834
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/aeubanks closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124834
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
>From 5b093ca42fdc24f89bfccac25e6f2e17155432f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Icohedron
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:24:00 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Implement the 'and' HLSL function
---
clang/include/clang/Ba
https://github.com/t-rasmud approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2025-02-14T17:43:43-08:00
New Revision: e9fb2391210e20d1d4dcf8bbe37085df902ed028
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e9fb2391210e20d1d4dcf8bbe37085df902ed028
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e9fb2391210e20d1d4dcf8bbe37085df902ed028.diff
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the quick review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2079,6 +2079,14 @@ static bool CheckFloatingOrIntRepresentation(Sema *S,
CallExpr *TheCall) {
checkAllSignedTypes);
}
+static bool CheckBoolRepresentation(Sema *S, CallExpr *TheCall) {
+ auto checkAllBoolTypes = [](clang::QualType Pass
Artem-B wrote:
> why there's a __has_builtin that's different from __can_use_builtin (or
> whatever we name it), and I don't know that any of us have an answer for that
my $.02
IMO it's a side effect of heterogeneous compilation, where compiler has to
parse source code for multiple targets (an
https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
This is not the right fix.
After we check the constant expression in Sema, we should create a ConstantExpr
containing the the evaluated value, so we don't need to re-evaluate it later.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127223
zixu-w wrote:
/cherry-pick
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/912b154f3a3f8c3cebf5cc5731fd8b0749762da5
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127136
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
@@ -119,6 +119,12 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY SystemZTargetInfo : public
TargetInfo {
TargetInfo::ConstraintInfo &info) const override;
std::string convertConstraint(const char *&Constraint) const override {
+if (llvm::StringRef(Constra
@@ -119,6 +119,12 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY SystemZTargetInfo : public
TargetInfo {
TargetInfo::ConstraintInfo &info) const override;
std::string convertConstraint(const char *&Constraint) const override {
+if (llvm::StringRef(Constra
@@ -12112,18 +12138,36 @@ void
SelectionDAGBuilder::lowerWorkItem(SwitchWorkListItem W, Value *Cond,
const APInt &SmallValue = Small.Low->getValue();
const APInt &BigValue = Big.Low->getValue();
+ // Incoming IR is switch table.Identify SRL/IPM/CC sequence fo
@@ -2837,8 +2837,34 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitBr(const BranchInst &I) {
Opcode = Instruction::And;
else if (match(BOp, m_LogicalOr(m_Value(BOp0), m_Value(BOp1
Opcode = Instruction::Or;
-
-if (Opcode &&
+auto &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo()
@@ -2621,9 +2621,25 @@ EmitAsmStores(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const AsmStmt &S,
if ((i < ResultRegIsFlagReg.size()) && ResultRegIsFlagReg[i]) {
// Target must guarantee the Value `Tmp` here is lowered to a boolean
// value.
- llvm::Constant *Two = llvm::Consta
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+//===--- Mustache.h -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
Author: Justin Bogner
Date: 2025-02-14T13:16:59-08:00
New Revision: 947695a37f1f95505826f170598e1ec126914ba1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/947695a37f1f95505826f170598e1ec126914ba1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/947695a37f1f95505826f170598e1ec126914ba1.diff
https://github.com/bogner closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127262
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127268
This change will cause clang and the other tools to statically link against the
runtimes built in stage1. This will make the built binaries more portable by
eliminating dependencies on system libraries like l
@@ -162,5 +219,371 @@ std::optional
RootSignatureLexer::PeekNextToken() {
return Result;
}
+// Parser Definitions
+
+RootSignatureParser::RootSignatureParser(SmallVector &Elements,
+ RootSignatureLexer &Lexer,
+
@@ -306,4 +307,254 @@ TEST_F(ParseHLSLRootSignatureTest,
InvalidLexRegNumberTest) {
ASSERT_FALSE(Consumer->IsSatisfied());
}
+// Valid Parser Tests
+
+TEST_F(ParseHLSLRootSignatureTest, ValidParseEmptyTest) {
+ const llvm::StringLiteral Source = R"cc()cc";
+
+ TrivialModu
@@ -93,6 +96,108 @@ class RootSignatureLexer {
}
};
+class RootSignatureParser {
+public:
+ RootSignatureParser(SmallVector &Elements,
+ RootSignatureLexer &Lexer, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags);
+
+ /// Iterates over the provided tokens and constructs the
@@ -299,6 +300,29 @@ struct RefCountableWithLambdaCapturingThis {
return obj->next();
});
}
+
+ void callAsyncNoescape([[clang::noescape]]
WTF::Function&&);
+ void method_temp_lambda(RefCountable* obj) {
+callAsyncNoescape([this, otherObj = RefPtr { obj }](au
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2245,6 +2245,17 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_and: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
+ return true;
+if (CheckVectorElementCallArgs(&SemaRef, TheCal
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ class SM newer_list> :
SMFeatures {
!strconcat(f, "|", newer.Features));
}
+let Features = "sm_101a" in def SM_101a : SMFeatures;
+
+def SM_101 : SM<"101", [SM_101a]>;
jodelek wrote:
Added sm120 and sm120a.
Thanks
https://github.com/jodelek edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2229,6 +2241,41 @@ static bool CheckResourceHandle(
// returning an ExprError
bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall)
{
switch (BuiltinID) {
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_adduint64: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126443
>From a40e782b866ec4756ddf3f04cc09caff31845ebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 13:50:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [webkit.UncountedLambdaCapturesChecker] Recognize nested
protec
https://github.com/jodelek edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferrándiz?= ,
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferrándiz?= ,
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferrándiz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple \
+// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -O1 -verify
+
+bool test_too_few_arg(bool a) {
+ return __builtin_hlsl_and(a);
+ // expected-error@-1 {{too few arguments to function call
Author: Henrich Lauko
Date: 2025-02-15T00:29:18+01:00
New Revision: d9b55b72103f7d2b35cdc7a6311f217016308d9c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9b55b72103f7d2b35cdc7a6311f217016308d9c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9b55b72103f7d2b35cdc7a6311f217016308d9c.diff
https://github.com/xlauko closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2245,6 +2245,17 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_and: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
+ return true;
+if (CheckVectorElementCallArgs(&SemaRef, TheCal
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferr=C3=A1ndiz?= ,
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferr=C3=A1ndiz?= ,
Vicente Mataix =?utf-8?q?Ferr=C3=A1ndiz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
LGTM. Please update release note also.
After that, feel free to ping me to merge
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple \
+// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -O1 -verify
+
+bool test_too_few_arg(bool a) {
+ return __builtin_hlsl_and(a);
+ // expected-error@-1 {{too few arguments to function call
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple \
+// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -O1 -verify
+
+bool test_too_few_arg(bool a) {
+ return __builtin_hlsl_and(a);
+ // expected-error@-1 {{too few arguments to function call
joaosaffran wrote:
@Prabhuk I committed it to my fork of llvm. So it shouldn't be related to your
build issues.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125880
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2229,6 +2241,41 @@ static bool CheckResourceHandle(
// returning an ExprError
bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall)
{
switch (BuiltinID) {
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_adduint64: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
dtarditi wrote:
@haoNoQ thanks for the explanation! Yes, this makes sense. I agree that the
right long-term approach is that the ArrayBoundChecker issues warnings about
out-of-bounds accesses. In general, I think it is desirable to report a
problem about undefined behavior as close to its ca
https://github.com/rniwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126443
>From a40e782b866ec4756ddf3f04cc09caff31845ebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 13:50:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [webkit.UncountedLambdaCapturesChecker] Recognize nested
protec
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -triple \
+// RUN: dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm -O1 -verify
+
+bool test_too_few_arg(bool a) {
+ return __builtin_hlsl_and(a);
+ // expected-error@-1 {{too few arguments to function call
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2229,6 +2241,41 @@ static bool CheckResourceHandle(
// returning an ExprError
bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall)
{
switch (BuiltinID) {
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_adduint64: {
+if (SemaRef.checkArgCount(TheCall, 2))
@@ -21,9 +21,17 @@ class SM newer_list> :
SMFeatures {
!strconcat(f, "|", newer.Features));
}
+let Features = "sm_120a" in def SM_120a : SMFeatures;
+
+def SM_120 : SM<"120", [SM_120a]>;
+
+let Features = "sm_101a" in def SM_101a : SMFeatures;
+
+def S
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127137
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Icohedron edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127137
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2025-02-14T16:33:34-08:00
New Revision: 77041da98932f77896d48366703d956ae7a82036
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77041da98932f77896d48366703d956ae7a82036
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/77041da98932f77896d48366703d956ae7a82036.diff
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126443
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jodelek edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
For the purpose of determining triviality, ignore all attributes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/WebKit/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
For the purpose of determining triviality, ignore all attributes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyze
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Prabhuk (Prabhuk)
Changes
For X64 UEFI targets, making the integer size and va_list kind fixes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127290.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetOSMacro
https://github.com/Prabhuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127290
For X64 UEFI targets, making the integer size and va_list kind fixes.
>From 3e6122744f355954edb6a5450ae4220ba39bc9c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: prabhukr
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:53:33 -0800
Subject: [PATC
https://github.com/rniwa created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127289
For the purpose of determining triviality, ignore all attributes.
>From 31e0fcbf7f8bf4d2244c863041df3716a598db3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:16:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH]
@@ -300,6 +306,10 @@ void NVPTXTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
Builder.defineMacro("__CUDA_ARCH_FEAT_SM90_ALL", "1");
if (GPU == OffloadArch::SM_100a)
Builder.defineMacro("__CUDA_ARCH_FEAT_SM100_ALL", "1");
+if (GPU == OffloadArch::SM_
https://github.com/Icohedron updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127098
>From 5b093ca42fdc24f89bfccac25e6f2e17155432f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Icohedron
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:24:00 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Implement the 'and' HLSL function
---
clang/include/clang/Ba
@@ -300,6 +306,10 @@ void NVPTXTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
Builder.defineMacro("__CUDA_ARCH_FEAT_SM90_ALL", "1");
if (GPU == OffloadArch::SM_100a)
Builder.defineMacro("__CUDA_ARCH_FEAT_SM100_ALL", "1");
+if (GPU == OffloadArch::SM_
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-in...".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/134/builds/13
https://github.com/hokein closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125232
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2025-02-14T16:21:53+01:00
New Revision: 922f339c4ef3631f66dc4b8caa4c356103dbf69d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/922f339c4ef3631f66dc4b8caa4c356103dbf69d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/922f339c4ef3631f66dc4b8caa4c356103dbf69d.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125232
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -315,16 +342,54 @@ bool
BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::isBlockingInCritSection(
void BlockInCriticalSectionChecker::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
CheckerContext &C) const {
if (isBlockingInCritSection(Call, C)) {
+
https://github.com/flovent edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127049
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From 78d04102fc6d6ead4ab1153a82ed2ab9d8437bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127162
>From 78d04102fc6d6ead4ab1153a82ed2ab9d8437bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:35:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-tidy] Fix invalid fixit from modernize-use-ranges
https://github.com/GS-GOAT updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127211
>From 5f46f9c8e29dde7d6096f4e00094b4e615874ed4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: GS-GOAT <86884129+gs-g...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:58:50 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Fixing the logic issue in
AaronBallman wrote:
> > @zixu-w and @ChuanqiXu9 Just want to clarify policies about changes
> > reversion. As far as I understand it was one example in some private
> > codebase with no reproducer publicly available. I can understand and
> > completely agree if it breaks any existing test or l
1 - 100 of 397 matches
Mail list logo
