@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+node: $Format:%H$
+node-date: $Format:%cI$
+describe-name: $Format:%(describe:tags=true,match=*[0-9]*)$
nightlark wrote:
Another thought, I expect most end users will eventually be installing from a
PyPI package -- the sdist and wheel files uplo
@@ -2916,6 +2917,12 @@ instrumentation:
$ LLVM_PROFILE_FILE="code-%m.profraw" ./code
+ Although rare, binary signatures used by the ``%m`` specifier can have
+ collisions. In this case, the ``%b`` specifier, which expands to the binary
+ ID (build ID), can be added
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Oleksandr T.
Date: 2025-02-06T10:37:23+02:00
New Revision: c7dc836bbe3658a9210a944b850450f5ae7b50a4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7dc836bbe3658a9210a944b850450f5ae7b50a4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7dc836bbe3658a9210a944b850450f5ae7b50a4.diff
https://github.com/petrhosek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123963
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/necto edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125884
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
>From f938ba2240e03756ac7597eedd0b5ac3ad1ece3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent`
mapping
This PR
Author: leijurv
Date: 2025-02-06T01:15:47-08:00
New Revision: d2b45ce100d641a8f1690e30843bb9c5ea71ab86
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d2b45ce100d641a8f1690e30843bb9c5ea71ab86
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d2b45ce100d641a8f1690e30843bb9c5ea71ab86.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@leijurv Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
https://github.com/kadircet updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125714
From b210fc4d5a12eeed12c1746012da41d0c50a79b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:30:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Parse warning-suppression-mapping after setting up
dia
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2025-02-06T10:18:38+01:00
New Revision: ecb016a87d89aed36b8f5d8102e15d8eb0e57108
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ecb016a87d89aed36b8f5d8102e15d8eb0e57108
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ecb016a87d89aed36b8f5d8102e15d8eb0e57108.dif
kadircet wrote:
/cherry-pick ecb016a87d89aed36b8f5d8102e15d8eb0e57108
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet requested changes to this pull request.
instead of introducing a new concept of `ProjectModulesCache` and requiring
each `ProjectModules` implementation to know about it and work with it; what
about introducing a:
```cpp
class CachingProjectModules : public ProjectMo
@@ -1738,6 +1738,12 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGBuilder::getValueImpl(const Value
*V) {
if (const auto *NC = dyn_cast(C))
return getValue(NC->getGlobalValue());
+if (VT == MVT::aarch64svcount) {
+ assert(C->isNullValue() && "Can only zero this target type!");
+
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126052
This builtin is a little more involved than others as targets deal with
fma in various different ways.
Fundamentally, the CLC __clc_fma builtin compiles to
__builtin_elementwise_fma, which compiles to the @l
frasercrmck wrote:
FYI @rjodinchr this breaks downstream clspv testing.
```
# | declare !kernel_arg_name !7 float @llvm.fma.f32(float, float, float) #2
# | Unsupported llvm intrinsic
# | UNREACHABLE executed at /clspv/lib/SPIRVProducerPass.cpp:2390!
```
I was wondering if clspv should be transl
@@ -0,0 +1,494 @@
+//===-- RISCVSchedGenericOOO.td - Generic O3 Processor -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/Meinersbur approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125998
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tblah approved this pull request.
Thanks for coming back to this @brad0
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125998
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
>From 03d500e28d76ab356537f771dd75ecce4010bd48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent`
mapping
This PR
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-02-06T04:36:47-05:00
New Revision: d1de75acea0da55316cd7827563e064105868f0f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1de75acea0da55316cd7827563e064105868f0f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1de75acea0da55316cd7827563e064105868f0f.diff
LO
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125998
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nightlark wrote:
@Endilll the Python bindings seem like part of LLVM that you have expertise in,
if you also want to review this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125806
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
https://github.com/usx95 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126039
None
>From fedb0a7b6d30870a3d7f7c77f8d431fdba3d3a7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:47:24 +
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Use getFileName and do not use realpath names
--
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126023
>From cf86e7a2333c36b9cf98d48f51548c847a8c0705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:18:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Claiming "threadset clause" for implementation.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Utkarsh Saxena (usx95)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126039.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp (+6-6)
```
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
Thank you for working on this
I know too little of packaging in Python to approve, but let's try to get more
eyes on this.
CC @DeinAlptraum @sighingnow
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125806
___
cfe-com
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=42", "setuptools_scm==8.1.0"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
+[project]
+name = "clang"
+description = "libclang python bindings"
+readme = {file = "README.txt", content-type = "text/plain"}
+
+license = {text
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=42", "setuptools_scm"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
+[project]
+name = "clang"
+description = "libclang python bindings"
+readme = {file = "README.txt", content-type = "text/plain"}
+
+license = { text = "Apa
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125806
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ivanaivanovska updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125492
>From 54c7b3c1fb149b82c26927d0fd831d8786f70ac3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivana Ivanovska
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:17:06 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Optimize -Wunsafe-buffer-usage.
---
clang/lib/Anal
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124920
>From bd731e4be65fc9c1746aa6a8f63d206eb54bb2be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:17:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [Clang] disallow attributes on void parameters
---
clan
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
>From 1a655ebd2bb01f54af6c42a373fb19e91dc56e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:00:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Add an option to control loop-interchange
T
@@ -316,6 +312,7 @@ PipelineTuningOptions::PipelineTuningOptions() {
LoopVectorization = true;
SLPVectorization = false;
LoopUnrolling = true;
+ LoopInterchange = false;
sjoerdmeijer wrote:
Good idea, that's now fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
@@ -2610,6 +2610,9 @@ void clang::sema::AnalysisBasedWarnings::IssueWarnings(
// The Callback function that performs analyses:
auto CallAnalyzers = [&](const Decl *Node) -> void {
+if (isa(Node) && Node->hasAttr())
Fznamznon wrote:
The attribute can b
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff cb714e74cc0efd5bfdb3e5e80978239425bd83d4
1a655ebd2bb01f54af6c42a373fb19e91dc56e5a --e
https://github.com/kadircet updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125722
From 4b24e73d39da9ad9badb2411363082a44046fc3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:45:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Stop parsing warning suppression mappings in driver
Th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
Author: Kareem Ergawy (ergawy)
Changes
This PR starts the effort to upstream AMD's internal implementation of `do
concurrent` to OpenMP mapping. This replaces #77285 since we extended
this WIP quite a bit on our fork over the past year.
A
https://github.com/kadircet milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-02-06T09:04:27Z
New Revision: d4144ca27da174da3f8e7e3472e788b4246fd04e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4144ca27da174da3f8e7e3472e788b4246fd04e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4144ca27da174da3f8e7e3472e788b4246fd04e.diff
LOG
https://github.com/ergawy created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
This PR starts the effort to upstream AMD's internal implementation of `do
concurrent` to OpenMP mapping. This replaces #77285 since we extended this WIP
quite a bit on our fork over the past year.
An important
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2025-02-06T10:02:42+01:00
New Revision: df22bbe2beb57687c76402bc0cfdf7901a31cf29
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df22bbe2beb57687c76402bc0cfdf7901a31cf29
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df22bbe2beb57687c76402bc0cfdf7901a31cf29.dif
kadircet wrote:
/cherry-pick df22bbe2beb57687c76402bc0cfdf7901a31cf29
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126023
>From cf86e7a2333c36b9cf98d48f51548c847a8c0705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:18:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Claiming "threadset clause" for implementation.
https://github.com/ergawy edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#126027
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125722
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1031,6 +1032,7 @@ void ExprEngine::removeDead(ExplodedNode *Pred,
ExplodedNodeSet &Out,
const LocationContext *LC,
const Stmt *DiagnosticStmt,
ProgramPoint::Kind K) {
+ llvm::TimeTraceScop
https://github.com/necto edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125884
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#126030
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126023
>From cf86e7a2333c36b9cf98d48f51548c847a8c0705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sunil Kuravinakop
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 02:18:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Claiming "threadset clause" for implementation.
https://github.com/jacquesguan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125997
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ def warn_arm_interrupt_vfp_clobber : Warning<
def err_arm_interrupt_called : Error<
"interrupt service routine cannot be called directly">;
def warn_interrupt_attribute_invalid : Warning<
jacquesguan wrote:
Maybe change this name since it
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ def warn_arm_interrupt_vfp_clobber : Warning<
def err_arm_interrupt_called : Error<
"interrupt service routine cannot be called directly">;
def warn_interrupt_attribute_invalid : Warning<
- "%select{MIPS|MSP430|RISC-V}0 'interrupt' attribute only applies
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
>From 72c1ccc8cbe7fa9734496a2f9b79fb9f73f126ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:00:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Add an option to control loop-interchange
T
brunodf-snps wrote:
> I think we can continue to refine our implementation, yeah. [...] The
> supertype-ish reasoning I laid out above seems like the right idea.
Thanks. FWIW, I think this can be implemented as laid out in #126047.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122116
_
sjoerdmeijer wrote:
> The other optimzation pass options (unrolll, vectorize, ...) are implemented
> in `PipelineTuningOptions` and `CodeGenOptions.def`. Do it the same way?
Thanks for the review and suggestion @Meinersbur, that's now implemented in the
latest revision.
https://github.com/ll
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ def warn_arm_interrupt_vfp_clobber : Warning<
def err_arm_interrupt_called : Error<
"interrupt service routine cannot be called directly">;
def warn_interrupt_attribute_invalid : Warning<
benshi001 wrote:
fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/ravurvi20 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125648
>From 189dd3cc2230ea5752969f02f119b6ee30e3df69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Urvi Rav
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 01:35:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] default clause replaced by otherwise clause for
metadirective
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125830
>From da944d743f9fb97ddb1a40f58d43b0262f58205a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sjoerd Meijer
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 03:00:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Driver] Add an option to control loop-interchange
T
https://github.com/brunodf-snps created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126047
Commit 77d3f8a avoids distinct tags for any pointers where the ultimate pointee
type is `void`, to solve breakage in real-world code that uses (indirections
to) `void*` for polymorphism over different poin
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ def warn_arm_interrupt_vfp_clobber : Warning<
def err_arm_interrupt_called : Error<
"interrupt service routine cannot be called directly">;
def warn_interrupt_attribute_invalid : Warning<
- "%select{MIPS|MSP430|RISC-V}0 'interrupt' attribute only applies
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bruno De Fraine (brunodf-snps)
Changes
Commit 77d3f8a avoids distinct tags for any pointers where the ultimate pointee
type is `void`, to solve breakage in real-world code that uses (indirections
to) `vo
@@ -316,6 +312,7 @@ PipelineTuningOptions::PipelineTuningOptions() {
LoopVectorization = true;
SLPVectorization = false;
LoopUnrolling = true;
+ LoopInterchange = false;
Meinersbur wrote:
The default of `LoopInterchange` could be initialized with
`Enab
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14184
Here is th
https://github.com/nightlark updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125806
>From a4c09eda556104fbe5a8acdb830215b2a4ebd131 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryan Mast
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:59:28 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [libclang/python] Enable packaging libclang bindings
---
.gitattr
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+node: $Format:%H$
+node-date: $Format:%cI$
+describe-name: $Format:%(describe:tags=true,match=*[0-9]*)$
nightlark wrote:
I didn't see an option for `git describe` to list out describes relative to all
possible tags -- just listing all tags might
https://github.com/nightlark edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125806
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ravurvi20 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125648
>From 189dd3cc2230ea5752969f02f119b6ee30e3df69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Urvi Rav
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 01:35:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] default clause replaced by otherwise clause for
metadirective
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125997
>From 2c02723208bd48e82621e3bee5b778f6c8bcd2e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:04:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][Sema] Emit warnings about incorrect AVR
interrupt/signa
ravurvi20 wrote:
> Thank you for this patch. I wonder: was this spelling change introduced in
> 5.2? If so, does the compiler after this patch still support the 5.1 spelling
> when providing this as the OpenMP version (`-fopenmp-version=5.1`)
Yes, otherwise clause was introduced in OpenMP 5.2
https://github.com/SunilKuravinakop created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126023
threadset clause is part of free-agent threads. But, free-agent threads also
involves runtime implementation. So, added an separate entry for threadset
clause and claimed it for clang.
>From cf86e7a23
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (SunilKuravinakop)
Changes
threadset clause is part of free-agent threads. But, free-agent threads also
involves runtime implementation. So, added an separate entry for threadset
clause and claimed it for clang.
---
Full diff: https
@@ -1031,6 +1032,7 @@ void ExprEngine::removeDead(ExplodedNode *Pred,
ExplodedNodeSet &Out,
const LocationContext *LC,
const Stmt *DiagnosticStmt,
ProgramPoint::Kind K) {
+ llvm::TimeTraceScop
Author: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: 2025-02-06T11:15:20+01:00
New Revision: 112490ce04edeb0b34ab2079b649e907c62fd47e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/112490ce04edeb0b34ab2079b649e907c62fd47e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/112490ce04edeb0b34ab2079b649e907c62fd47e.diff
https://github.com/usx95 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126039
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126039
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang,flang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/14191
Here
steakhal wrote:
FYI others had issue with this commit, fixed by #126039.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125508
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> One question is whether the reflection proposal would address something like
> this. If it does, it might make more sense to invest in that than a custom
> solution.
That seems like a great long-term direction, but the amount of investment
between the two is also vastly
hokein wrote:
Heads-up: this patch triggers a MSAN failure in an lldb test
(`lldb/test/API/commands/expression/call-function/TestCallStdStringFunction.py`),
the stacktrace:
```
==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 in decltype(auto)
clang::ASTNodeImporter::CallOv
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
>From 04b5656b48bedf1250280c4145ee1c9b2a3f7cdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 23:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][OpenMP] Upstream first part of `do concurrent`
mapping
This PR
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ArtSin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123963
>From 3ebeb7bac943e447adecbefcebbd1f4f5b8d03aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Sinkevich
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:56:56 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] [profile] Add `%b` `LLVM_PROFILE_FILE` option for binary ID
Add
https://github.com/ilya-biryukov approved this pull request.
Could you add a description mentioning that real paths resolves symlinks and
makes the tests fail when some forms of content-addressable filesystem is used
(our internal environment)?
Otherwise LG!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
@@ -1031,6 +1032,7 @@ void ExprEngine::removeDead(ExplodedNode *Pred,
ExplodedNodeSet &Out,
const LocationContext *LC,
const Stmt *DiagnosticStmt,
ProgramPoint::Kind K) {
+ llvm::TimeTraceScop
https://github.com/w2yehia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124353
>From abef90fe8f46431a5fb8b7fe717c9fb65eb30266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wael Yehia
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:03:15 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [PGO] Add a clang option -fprofile-continuous that
enables PGO
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126045
>From 10d37ec7e406d3b6ff5034003087a4b6cbb76fe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:02:50 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][DebugInfo] Set EnumKind based on enum_extensibility
at
https://github.com/yxsamliu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122565
>From 7700273abae3318eb47bd508c0131220228b2624 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 01:21:24 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Precommit end-to-end test for `--repository`
option
W
https://github.com/yxsamliu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122565
>From 872c3d010eaa746683fbc944fbd30a3d2b02a40b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 01:21:24 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Precommit end-to-end test for `--repository`
option
W
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/12205
Here is the relevant
kuilpd wrote:
> > This is just moving stuff around so that seems fine. Though, I wonder,
> > could we just pass e.g. an `ArrayRef` to `computeEnumBits()`? The
> > LLDB pr you linked seems to have an `SmallVector`, so
> > that should be possible (I think it does require a `reinterpret_cast` fro
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// 1) test on platforms that (do or do not) require runtime relocation
+//
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-darwin -fprofile-generate -fprofile-continuous
-### -c %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO_RELOC
+// NO_RELOC: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-fprofile-continuous"
+//
sarnex wrote:
Merging this now to unbreak CI, will address any feedback in followup
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126104
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
