https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119974
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Barnabás Pőcze
Date: 2025-01-12T10:07:52+01:00
New Revision: a536bd0dbbd60e83ee6cf11adabd72f4df54
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a536bd0dbbd60e83ee6cf11adabd72f4df54
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a536bd0dbbd60e83ee6cf11adabd72f4df54.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@pobrn Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build, y
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119974
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2252,6 +2252,25 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// \version 16
BreakBeforeInlineASMColonStyle BreakBeforeInlineASMColon;
+ /// If ``true``, a line break will be placed before the ``>`` in a multiline
+ /// template declaration.
+ /// \code
+ ///true:
+ ///templat
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@Sharjeel-Khan Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a
Author: Sharjeel Khan
Date: 2025-01-12T17:36:00+08:00
New Revision: fdfe7e7fabc85ed7293ca6f5f234d41812644584
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fdfe7e7fabc85ed7293ca6f5f234d41812644584
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fdfe7e7fabc85ed7293ca6f5f234d41812644584.diff
https://github.com/carlocab approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122540
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/carlocab closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122540
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -713,8 +713,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY X86_64TargetInfo : public
X86TargetInfo {
X86_64TargetInfo(const llvm::Triple &Triple, const TargetOptions &Opts)
: X86TargetInfo(Triple, Opts) {
const bool IsX32 = getTriple().isX32();
-bool IsWinCOFF =
-
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
zwuis wrote:
> I think this test should go in `clang/test/Sema/conditional-expr.c` and we
> should add a section of the GNU extension there.
>
> I am also a bit concerned that we don't hav
Author: MichelleCDjunaidi
Date: 2025-01-12T11:04:40+01:00
New Revision: 8ebc35f8d041f097a2b973b455dc3533420af6bf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ebc35f8d041f097a2b973b455dc3533420af6bf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ebc35f8d041f097a2b973b455dc3533420af6bf.d
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@MichelleCDjunaidi Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR)
merged into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem wit
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/4702
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-02` while building
`clang-tools-extra` at step 11 "build stage 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/4559
Here is the releva
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
>From 7e5f88c322852939ae68c65f6adf4a5d2973d095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yanzuo Liu
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:50:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fix computing result type of conditional operand
---
clang/docs
@@ -774,7 +774,15 @@ std::string
PredefinedExpr::ComputeName(PredefinedIdentKind IK,
const FunctionDecl *Decl = FD;
if (const FunctionDecl* Pattern = FD->getTemplateInstantiationPattern())
Decl = Pattern;
-const FunctionType *AFT = Decl->getType()->getAs();
+
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM (but i reworded the comment slightly)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
dodicidodici wrote:
> This check sounds a bit strange. Is this issue common in real-world projects,
> do we have some data? It's the first time I've heard of it. Why would people
> deviate from the standard signature for move constructors?
It's anecdotal, but I've encountered it in a few place
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-arm64-windows-msvc`
running on `linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-04` while building `clang-tools-extra` at
step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/4099
Here
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122627
>From 71bad77117ef0dedbe6c28ff578470d8266108a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:24:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Use `-targets=host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` as
bundler
shiltian wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jan 12, 10:49 AM EST**: A user started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/122627).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122627
__
Author: Shilei Tian
Date: 2025-01-12T10:51:12-05:00
New Revision: 0d352b2ea767e043b47d78bfdbd6820356628314
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0d352b2ea767e043b47d78bfdbd6820356628314
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0d352b2ea767e043b47d78bfdbd6820356628314.diff
L
https://github.com/shiltian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122627
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
>From b1dbe4f558fe282968af1ac33d58d74d3238d8d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:48:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OffloadBundler] Rework the ctor of `OffloadTargetInfo` to
suppo
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
>From c58bbd1edcc295a03d68a311a16080550c6aea96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:48:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OffloadBundler] Rework the ctor of `OffloadTargetInfo` to
suppo
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
zwuis wrote:
> Should run with BOTH constexpr interpreters.
Sorry I don't understand the mea
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: TilakChad
Date: 2025-01-12T15:42:04+01:00
New Revision: d080f78772acf9de4961b89062c02fdd5f82186a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d080f78772acf9de4961b89062c02fdd5f82186a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d080f78772acf9de4961b89062c02fdd5f82186a.diff
LOG
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android` running on `sanitizer-buildbot-android` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/5591
Here is the releva
TilakChad wrote:
> LGTM.
> Do you need me to merge that for you?
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+//===--- ExplicitMoveConstructorCheck.h - clang-tidy *- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===--- ExplicitMoveConstructorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - performance-explicit-move-constructor
+
+performance-explicit-move-constructor
+=
+
+Checks for classes that define an explicit move constructor and a copy
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please s
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
>From b2c656afdf99eff52d019b68fcbbc6ce4bbdd7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:51:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] disallow the use of asterisks preceding
constructo
@@ -8785,14 +8785,11 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnConditionalOp(SourceLocation
QuestionLoc,
commonExpr = result.get();
}
// We usually want to apply unary conversions *before* saving, except
-// in the special case of a C++ l-value conditional.
-if (!(getLang
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
>From 7e5f88c322852939ae68c65f6adf4a5d2973d095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yanzuo Liu
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:50:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fix computing result type of conditional operand
---
clang/docs
https://github.com/TilakChad updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
>From 4e5935f6631f0f0cd828559ec29ed931bc0333d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tilak Chad
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:03:32 +0545
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fixed a crash when __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ or
__FUNCSIG_
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I prefer to make it in bugprone and warn for all kinds of incorrect signatures
for these special functions. what do you think.@5chmidti @carlosgalvezp
@PiotrZSL
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122599
___
cfe-commits mail
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
zwuis wrote:
> I'm also concerned about the constexpr support being 'FIXME', it seems that
> this should just 'work' unless something odd is happening.
Sorry I forgot the restriction of constexpr function in C++11. Fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108837
___
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Do you need me to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-01` while building `clang`
at step 11 "build stage 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/4476
Here is the relevant piece of
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122280
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -86,10 +87,11 @@
// CHECK-NEXT: sve-aes2FEAT_SVE_AES2
Enable Armv9.6-A SVE multi-vector AES and multi-vector quadword
polynomial multiply instructions
// CHECK-NEXT: sve-b16b16 FEAT_SVE_B16B16
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121947
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chandraghale updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121916
>From 7d03bd61553690f22c03b52ef2bda8a09938e7a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chandra Ghale
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 05:09:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] codegen support for masked combined construct masked taskloo
Author: CHANDRA GHALE
Date: 2025-01-12T23:38:00+05:30
New Revision: 1d2eea962ac9724350f025f4c70808d42a435289
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d2eea962ac9724350f025f4c70808d42a435289
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d2eea962ac9724350f025f4c70808d42a435289.diff
https://github.com/chandraghale closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121916
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
CarolineConcatto wrote:
> On top of comments I left I think we should also add new runlines to both
> assembly tests for individual instructions, to check that we produce correct
> assembly when ssve-bitperm feature is used.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121947
__
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/10325
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-02` while building `clang`
at step 11 "build stage 2".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/4570
Here is the relevant piece of
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122651
Note that PointerUnion::dyn_cast has been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
//isa, cast and the llvm::dyn_cast
Literal migration
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for the fix.
Please add a more detailed summary, the title feels sufficient to describe the
problem but you should outline the solution in the summary, at least briefly.
e.g. adding `checkMethodPointerType` which will called during to verify
@@ -96,3 +96,13 @@ namespace PR38286 {
template struct C; // expected-note {{non-type declaration found}}
template C::~C() {} // expected-error {{identifier 'C' after
'~' in destructor name does not name a type}}
}
+
+namespace GH121706 {
+struct S {
+ *S(); // expected-
https://github.com/shafik edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
A special handling for `PreferredName` looks slightly add-hoc to me. What I
thought is to delay the deserialization of `attributes` after the
deserialization of the declaration. If this is too optimistic, I am wondering
if we can delay reading of some s
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s performance-explicit-move-constructor %t
+
+class NotReported1 {};
+
+class NotReported2 {
+public:
+ NotReported2(NotReported2&&) = default;
+ NotReported2(const NotReported2&) = default;
+};
+
+class NotReported3 {
+public:
+ exp
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===--- ExplicitMoveConstructorCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122599
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:
To be honest, best would be flag calls to copy constructors that take rvalue
where move constructor exists. In such case it would found actual performance
issues.
But still this kind of check is fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122599
hpoussin wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Bill Hoffman
Date: 2025-01-13T10:20:20+08:00
New Revision: acbd822879f7727127926c25e1b47f5017f962c5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acbd822879f7727127926c25e1b47f5017f962c5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acbd822879f7727127926c25e1b47f5017f962c5.diff
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@billhoffman Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a bu
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122423
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 commented:
Do we need to update `buildModuleFile` in
`clang-tools-extra/clangd/ModulesBuilder.cpp` to update the commands to build
the module interfaces?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122606
___
cfe-commits m
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
/// FIXME: Skip testing on windows temporarily due to the different escaping
/// code mode.
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Move the include after the `#ifndef`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122606
_
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122606
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121788
>From 4e2166f1c19246e3fb5074da466d151070b5606c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sander de Smalen
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:20:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AArch64][Clang] Add support for
__arm_agnostic("sm
https://github.com/shiltian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122629
>From 2fdbbac7ca1dcb5b6a0ad28f9fedabf24c634465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shilei Tian
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:58:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OffloadBundler] Rework the ctor of `OffloadTargetInfo` to
suppo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/10935
Here is the relevant
Author: CHANDRA GHALE
Date: 2025-01-13T11:42:13+05:30
New Revision: 6f558e0e124012fd00927d6d42545649bd7e0dcd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f558e0e124012fd00927d6d42545649bd7e0dcd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f558e0e124012fd00927d6d42545649bd7e0dcd.diff
https://github.com/chandraghale closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121914
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> > This check sounds a bit strange. Is this issue common in real-world
> > projects, do we have some data? It's the first time I've heard of it. Why
> > would people deviate from the standard signature for move constructors?
>
> It's anecdotal, but I've encountered it in a
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-01` while building `clang` at step 5 "cmake stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/4710
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/doc
@@ -2252,6 +2252,25 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// \version 16
BreakBeforeInlineASMColonStyle BreakBeforeInlineASMColon;
+ /// If ``true``, a line break will be placed before the ``>`` in a multiline
+ /// template declaration.
+ /// \code
+ ///true:
+ ///templat
hanickadot wrote:
I pushed new design, will update PR's description soon, but now I need to
finish proposal's wording.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2025-01-12T13:17:49-08:00
New Revision: 5c0aa31c3cb448065f12ede53e4dd54a9a98f650
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c0aa31c3cb448065f12ede53e4dd54a9a98f650
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c0aa31c3cb448065f12ede53e4dd54a9a98f650.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4f4e2abb1a5ff1225d32410fd02b732d077aa056
ff22639d751a38e633a5b2e4fe42586d81b36499 --e
@@ -10757,6 +10757,17 @@ static void checkMethodTypeQualifiers(Sema &S,
Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
}
}
+static void checkMethodPointerType(Sema &S, Declarator &D, unsigned DiagID) {
+ if (D.getNumTypeObjects() > 0) {
+DeclaratorChunk &Chunk = D.getTypeObject(D.g
https://github.com/sharadhr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121046
>From 3a84b5906330c4f6308e10c50381f06956c27e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sharadh Rajaraman
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:32:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Accept /Fo and -Fo in `-fmodule-output` when running
u
https://github.com/sharadhr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121046
>From 3a84b5906330c4f6308e10c50381f06956c27e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sharadh Rajaraman
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:32:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Accept /Fo and -Fo in `-fmodule-output` when running
u
https://github.com/Meinersbur updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121997
>From a08aa48fb4955f9d16c6172580505c100076b5d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Kruse
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:05:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Join FortranDecimal into FortranCommon
---
clang/lib/Dri
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
