llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
Treat member function calls to ref() and incrementCheckedPtrCount() as trivial
so that a function which returns RefPtr/Ref out of a raw reference / pointer is
also considered trivial.
---
Fu
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ tbx z0.b, z1.b, z2.b
// CHECK: error: instruction requires: sve2 or sme
// CHECK-NEXT: tbx z0.b, z1.b, z2.b
-.arch_extension sve2-aes
-.arch_extension nosve2-aes
+.arch_extension sve-aes
+.arch_extension nosve-aes
labrinea wrote:
> all sve2-
silverclaw wrote:
I'd love to see this finally committed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96640
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
silverclaw wrote:
Would be great to see this upstreamed before it just gets ignored...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114824
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ tbx z0.b, z1.b, z2.b
// CHECK: error: instruction requires: sve2 or sme
// CHECK-NEXT: tbx z0.b, z1.b, z2.b
-.arch_extension sve2-aes
-.arch_extension nosve2-aes
+.arch_extension sve-aes
+.arch_extension nosve-aes
SpencerAbson wrote:
I see,
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ enum class StructuralEquivalenceKind {
};
struct StructuralEquivalenceContext {
+ /// Store declaration pairs already found to be non-equivalent.
+ /// key: (from, to, IgnoreTemplateParmDepth)
+ using NonEquivalentDeclSet = llvm::DenseSet>;
--
@@ -2511,7 +2512,8 @@ bool StructuralEquivalenceContext::Finish() {
if (!Equivalent) {
// Note that these two declarations are not equivalent (and we already
// know about it).
- NonEquivalentDecls.insert(P);
+ NonEquivalentDecls.insert(
+ std
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115518
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/malavikasamak edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115518
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-11-11T12:38:27-06:00
New Revision: da78ac5d331953d3386fd56cd7979022be7400cf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/da78ac5d331953d3386fd56cd7979022be7400cf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/da78ac5d331953d3386fd56cd7979022be7400cf.diff
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115237
>From 24f60890a4a1cef2c9387040fce6d0864fcb01f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:18:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][serialization] Make `ASTWriter` accept
`Preproces
@@ -67,9 +67,10 @@ class BindingKey {
isa(r)) &&
"Not a base");
}
-public:
+public:
bool isDirect() const { return P.getInt() & Direct; }
+ bool isDefault() const { return !isDirect(); }
NagyDonat wrote:
```suggestion
```
This is
kovdan01 wrote:
> Using cc1 options looks fine.
Thanks!
> Sorry, I made a mistake by approving #85235, which added a lot of driver
> options. It's not clear who are the initial ELF ptrauth users, but I am not
> sure with a very small user base, there are a lot of demands to customize the
> p
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ using size_t = unsigned long;
#endif // SPIR
} // namespace std
-float __builtin_atan2f(float, float);
+float __builtin_erff(float);
farzonl wrote:
Just want to put a note here we are doing this because atan2 would no longer
test the callin
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/9263
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/7589
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/6621
Here is the relevant pie
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
> Another possible solution: Use two `NonEquivalentDecls` sets, one for
> `IgnoreTemplateParmDepth = true` and one for `false`. This may use less
> memory (no rarely used third value in the key) but requires more code changes.
I like this idea, and I thi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/7298
Here is the relevant piece of
@@ -1804,8 +1804,10 @@ struct StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest : public
StructuralEquivalenceTest {
}
template
- bool isInNonEqCache(std::pair D) {
-return NonEquivalentDecls.count(D) > 0;
+ bool isInNonEqCache(std::pair D,
+ bool IgnoreTemplateP
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ class TypeSourceInfo;
class ASTImporter {
friend class ASTNodeImporter;
public:
-using NonEquivalentDeclSet = llvm::DenseSet>;
+using NonEquivalentDeclSet =
+llvm::DenseSet>;
NagyDonat wrote:
```suggestion
using No
@@ -2303,7 +2303,8 @@ static bool
IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
// Check whether we already know that these two declarations are not
// structurally equivalent.
- if (Context.NonEquivalentDecls.count(P))
+ if (Context.NonEquivalentDecls
https://github.com/VigneshwarJ updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113470
>From 0e2ee524f5b5c19169e446c55a386a00cfb0f6bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vigneshwar jayakumar
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:20:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang/AMDGPU] Zero sized arrays not allowed in H
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/10631
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/7704
Here is the
@@ -633,7 +633,8 @@ void RequirementHandler::initAvailableCapabilities(const
SPIRVSubtarget &ST) {
if (ST.isAtLeastSPIRVVer(VersionTuple(1, 6)))
addAvailableCaps({Capability::DotProduct, Capability::DotProductInputAll,
Capability::DotProductInput4x8
jhuber6 wrote:
Seems there's something *slightly* different from the autogenerated IR for the
language test. I'll see if I can fix it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ void constant_idx_unsafe(unsigned idx) {
// expected-note@-1{{change type of 'buffer' to
'std::array' to label it for hardening}}
buffer[10] = 0; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
}
+
+void constant_id_string(unsi
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ void constant_idx_unsafe(unsigned idx) {
// expected-note@-1{{change type of 'buffer' to
'std::array' to label it for hardening}}
buffer[10] = 0; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
}
+
+void constant_id_string(unsi
@@ -232,27 +233,86 @@ class RegionBindingsRef : public
llvm::ImmutableMapRef StringifyCache;
+auto ToString = [&StringifyCache](const MemRegion *R) {
+ auto [Place, Inserted] = StringifyCache.try_emplace(R);
+ if (!Inserted)
+return Place->second;
+ std
@@ -4858,14 +4860,21 @@ time_t ASTWriter::getTimestampForOutput(const FileEntry
*E) const {
return IncludeTimestamps ? E->getModificationTime() : 0;
}
-ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteAST(Sema &SemaRef, StringRef OutputFile,
- Module *Wr
farzonl wrote:
So the minute this lands our change is going to be visible across all backends.
Should we add any constraint intrinsic tests to `PowerPC`, `RISCV`, `SystemZ`,
etc?
Here are just a handful of tests that we might want to update, but there are
others:
- llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ using size_t = unsigned long;
#endif // SPIR
} // namespace std
-float __builtin_atan2f(float, float);
+float __builtin_erff(float);
tex3d wrote:
Right, I hope I captured that in the PR description above. If that's not clear
enough let me
topperc wrote:
Missing RISCVUsage.rst
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115657
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
playstation-edd wrote:
> Does the flipped order of library-option-names in
> [100c3c2](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/100c3c271437b3b6181a5a57381363f4b6e9e841)
> have an actual effect on behaviour? Just curious.
No effect. I accidentally flipped the order it in the initial commit
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/playstation-edd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115497
>From 112e3e7ca9e3fd041fb0a1a0b7d97aa26740a908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Edd Dawson
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:57:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [PS5][Driver] Supply libraries and CRT objects to the
l
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2024-11-11T11:01:01-08:00
New Revision: a2f9d1d078cefc3ee7b19610f7117d1fb1369f18
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a2f9d1d078cefc3ee7b19610f7117d1fb1369f18
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a2f9d1d078cefc3ee7b19610f7117d1fb1369f18.diff
L
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/4705
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/7462
Here is the relevant piece of
@@ -661,8 +661,8 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
/// Write a precompiled header for the given semantic analysis.
///
- /// \param SemaRef a reference to the semantic analysis object that processed
- /// the AST to be written into the precompiled h
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/1868
Here is the relevant piece o
@@ -322,22 +322,26 @@ foreach( t ${LIBCLC_TARGETS_TO_BUILD} )
if ( ARCH STREQUAL spirv OR ARCH STREQUAL spirv64 )
set( build_flags -O0 -finline-hint-functions -DCLC_SPIRV )
- set( opt_flags )
+ set( clc_opt_flags )
+ # Inline CLC functions into OpenCL
https://github.com/malavikasamak updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115552
>From 94ba7d8b845f18b089e03c0fa41d9d1d20e79f0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: MalavikaSamak
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:40:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Fix false positives in handling stri
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+#define CLC_SIGN(TYPE, F)
\
+ _CLC_DEF _CLC_OVERLOAD TYPE __clc_sign(TYPE x) {
\
+if (__clc_isnan(x)) {
https://github.com/arsenm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -196,11 +196,13 @@ Any occurrence of the moved variable that is not a
reinitialization (see below)
is considered to be a use.
An exception to this are objects of type ``std::unique_ptr``,
-``std::shared_ptr`` and ``std::weak_ptr``, which have defined move behavior
-(object
https://github.com/higher-performance updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114255
>From d20ee5cb833df005856c8e466e4bfa21beb131ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: higher-performance
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:01:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Extend bugprone-use-after-move check to handle
@@ -196,11 +196,13 @@ Any occurrence of the moved variable that is not a
reinitialization (see below)
is considered to be a use.
An exception to this are objects of type ``std::unique_ptr``,
-``std::shared_ptr`` and ``std::weak_ptr``, which have defined move behavior
-(object
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115239
>From 136e484907d24f1ba0efc4f658fabcdb95fa8498 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][deps] Only write preprocessor info into PCMs
---
@@ -89,7 +182,25 @@ class UncountedLambdaCapturesChecker
}
printQuotedQualifiedName(Os, Capture.getCapturedVar());
-Os << " to uncounted type is unsafe.";
+Os << " to ref-counted / CheckedPtr capable type is unsafe.";
+
+PathDiagnosticLocation BSLoc(Capture
https://github.com/usx95 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111499
>From 6ae72b7267193f6ee2f47c31d8a9542466d08ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:42:49 +
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce [[clang::lifetime_capture_by]]
---
clang/docs/Release
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -ast-dump | FileCheck %s
+
+// Verify that we print the [[clang::lifetime_capture_by(X)]] attribute.
+
+struct S {
+void foo(int &a, int &b) [[clang::lifetime_capture_by(a, b, global)]];
+};
+
+// CHECK: CXXMethodDecl {{.*}}clang::lifetim
@@ -1760,6 +1760,10 @@ class Sema final : public SemaBase {
/// Add [[gsl::Pointer]] attributes for std:: types.
void inferGslPointerAttribute(TypedefNameDecl *TD);
+ LifetimeCaptureByAttr *ParseLifetimeCaptureByAttr(const ParsedAttr &AL,
hokein wrote:
a
@@ -3967,6 +3967,69 @@ Attribute ``trivial_abi`` has no effect in the following
cases:
}];
}
+
+def LifetimeCaptureByDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``lifetime_capture_by(X)`` attribute on a function parameter or
implic
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar commented:
So is the sign function currently implemented in the OpenCL headers?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115699
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
https://github.com/qt-tatiana updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113144
>From 34ee6f5836efe3acddbdd1c9810af358b8c4f981 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tatiana Borisova
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:00:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [clang-tidy] Create a check for signed and unsigned
i
frasercrmck wrote:
> > So is the sign function currently implemented in the OpenCL headers?
>
> The sign function for SPIR-V/Mesa is currently implemented by libclc
> [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libclc/generic/lib/common/sign.cl).
> With this change, `sign` now calls
https://github.com/qt-tatiana edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113144
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
qt-tatiana wrote:
> Perhaps this has been discussed before, but I think the part about "add qt
> module" should be added on a separate patch, since adding a brand-new tidy
> module is a rather big thing.
>
> So this patch could be only about adding the `modernize` check, and a
> follow-up pat
balazske wrote:
Currently one of the tests fail, the problem is fixed if #115518 is applied.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115734
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115734
The fix applies to a case that occurs when the AST contains a friend template
that is contained within another template and this (outer) template has
specialization. (See the added test code in the commit.)
Th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
The fix applies to a case that occurs when the AST contains a friend template
that is contained within another template and this (outer) template has
specialization. (See the added test code in the commit.)
Author: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: 2024-11-11T17:18:29+01:00
New Revision: 8c4331c1abeb33eabf3cdbefa7f2b6e0540e7f4f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c4331c1abeb33eabf3cdbefa7f2b6e0540e7f4f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8c4331c1abeb33eabf3cdbefa7f2b6e0540e7f4f.diff
usx95 wrote:
I will proceed with landing this. Happy to address future comments in a
followup.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
https://github.com/usx95 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ void constant_idx_unsafe(unsigned idx) {
// expected-note@-1{{change type of 'buffer' to
'std::array' to label it for hardening}}
buffer[10] = 0; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
}
+
+void constant_id_string(unsi
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ void constant_idx_unsafe(unsigned idx) {
// expected-note@-1{{change type of 'buffer' to
'std::array' to label it for hardening}}
buffer[10] = 0; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
}
+
+void constant_id_string(unsi
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115406
>From eda669f73765a957cc47d3d684a6443ed2f75edf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:04:21 +
Subject: [PATCH] Extend clang's to define *LONG_LONG*_ macros for
bionic
---
clan
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115406
>From eda669f73765a957cc47d3d684a6443ed2f75edf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:04:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Extend clang's to define *LONG_LONG*_ macros
for bionic
---
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115040
>From cba8a46cd0dcbdf5079712354e5d0829199e0e08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 12:59:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Comments] Make @relates an inline comment co
sdkrystian wrote:
@AaronBallman Test added
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115040
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -661,8 +661,8 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
/// Write a precompiled header for the given semantic analysis.
///
- /// \param SemaRef a reference to the semantic analysis object that processed
- /// the AST to be written into the precompiled h
@@ -4858,14 +4860,21 @@ time_t ASTWriter::getTimestampForOutput(const FileEntry
*E) const {
return IncludeTimestamps ? E->getModificationTime() : 0;
}
-ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteAST(Sema &SemaRef, StringRef OutputFile,
- Module *Wr
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-11-11T10:09:55-08:00
New Revision: 11cc826c0a5802b03c85aa271b6fd16214f8f4d8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11cc826c0a5802b03c85aa271b6fd16214f8f4d8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11cc826c0a5802b03c85aa271b6fd16214f8f4d8.diff
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115406
>From eda669f73765a957cc47d3d684a6443ed2f75edf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zijun
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:04:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Extend clang's to define *LONG_LONG*_ macros
for bionic
---
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115239
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lenary wrote:
Sorry I didn't get to this over the weekend. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
I had another simple fix when the cache is used only if
`IgnoreTemplateParmDepth` is false which is the often used case. During one
structural equivalence comparison `IgnoreTemplateParmDepth` does not change,
just one set of the cached values (for `IgnoreTemplateParmDepth`) is
@@ -1684,6 +1684,15 @@ class CompoundStmt final
return hasStoredFPFeatures() ? getStoredFPFeatures() : FPOptionsOverride();
}
+ /// Get FPOptions inside this statement. They may differ from the outer
+ /// options due to pragmas.
+ /// \param CurFPOptions FPOptions ou
vbe-sc wrote:
> @vbe-sc I can later today or tomorrow.
That's would be great, thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-11-11T07:34:42-08:00
New Revision: 173529104d598785c2f8c36c047a6d0f1d0f060e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/173529104d598785c2f8c36c047a6d0f1d0f060e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/173529104d598785c2f8c36c047a6d0f1d0f060e.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115682
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pogo59 wrote:
FWIW, IMO the implicit-check-not idea was worth trying, but not worth keeping.
Up to @jmorse though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115497
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ def have_host_clang_repl_cuda():
config.substitutions.append(("%host_cc", config.host_cc))
config.substitutions.append(("%host_cxx", config.host_cxx))
+# Determine whether the test target is compatible with execution on the host.
+if config.host_arch in con
https://github.com/sjoerdmeijer approved this pull request.
Looks like a good fix to me.
Please wait a day in case @davemgreen has comments, and it is better to commit
in the morning anyway. :)
For convenience, the diff with the previous version is this first line in the
test:
```
// REQUIR
danix800 wrote:
> > Thanks for the commit, I'm satisfied with it :)
> > I actually like that these two related changes (the checker change and the
> > constraint manager improvement) are handled together in a single commit --
> > this way somebody who browses the commit log can directly see the
https://github.com/t-rasmud approved this pull request.
LGTM! Left a couple nits, mainly about readability of the warning.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114897
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/t-rasmud edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114897
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -45,32 +52,118 @@ class UncountedLambdaCapturesChecker
bool shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() const { return true; }
bool shouldVisitImplicitCode() const { return false; }
- bool VisitLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr *L) {
-Checker->visitLambdaExpr(L);
+
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 approved this pull request.
LGTM! Thank you @malavikasamak
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -38,3 +38,17 @@ void constant_idx_unsafe(unsigned idx) {
// expected-note@-1{{change type of 'buffer' to
'std::array' to label it for hardening}}
buffer[10] = 0; // expected-note{{used in buffer access here}}
}
+
+void constant_id_string(unsi
https://github.com/jkorous-apple approved this pull request.
LGTM
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115552
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fzou1 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115829
This is a follow-up to #113850.
Ref.: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368
>From 9fd6e9e598423b6cc58a25fe70cc12a846483be5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Zou
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:56:17 +0800
201 - 300 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
