MrSidims wrote:
Don't get me wrong, what I'm saying is not an objection against the patch, but
rather an attempt to test the waters :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
https://github.com/keith-packard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111235
>From f0546a52bc25327007f75e7267654a858637a76d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:06:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Support aarch64 without FPU
Skip save/restore of FPU r
https://github.com/MrSidims approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110695
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2015,6 +2015,13 @@ _HLSL_AVAILABILITY(shadermodel, 6.0)
_HLSL_BUILTIN_ALIAS(__builtin_hlsl_wave_is_first_lane)
__attribute__((convergent)) bool WaveIsFirstLane();
+// \brief Returns the value of the expression for the given lane index within
+// the specified wave.
+templa
@@ -633,6 +633,13 @@ Lnovec:
.arch_extension gcs
#endif
+#if defined(__ARM_FP) && __ARM_FP != 0
+#define LDP(a,b,r,o,p) stp a, b, [r, o]
+#else
+/* In reverse order so that the last LDP(x0,x1,x0) works. */
+#define LDP(a,b,r,o,p) ldr b, [r, p] ; ldr a, [r, o]
damyanp wrote:
> Hey Damyan, GH suggested you as a reviewer for this. Would you be able to
> TAL? Happy to find someone else if not :)
I'm not sure why GH would have done that, I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to give
an informed review here. (I might have a quick look anyway).
https://github.co
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111446
[P1787R6](https://wg21.link/p1787r6):
> [CWG110](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/110.html) is resolved by
> reducing the restriction in [temp.pre] to a note (matching the behavior of
> GCC, Clang, and IC
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
[P1787R6](https://wg21.link/p1787r6):
> [CWG110](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/110.html) is resolved by
reducing the restriction in [temp.pre] to a note (matching the behavior of GCC,
Clang, a
https://github.com/ElvinaYakubova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97749
>From 6ba67c2f67d6f5039b3f9dbfc283c0c17ba34c89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Hickey
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 07:22:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Add getHostCPUFeatures to query for enabled
fe
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111285
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bc-lee wrote:
@kadircet @hokein Could you please review this PR? It is related to #102615.
More details are provided in the related issue. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111375
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#include "../assembly.h"
-#ifdef __aarch64__
+#if defined(__aarch64__) && __ARM_FP != 0
arichardson wrote:
Unless I've missed something, only memset uses the q registers? So memcpy
should still be fine?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ElvinaYakubova updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97749
>From 6ba67c2f67d6f5039b3f9dbfc283c0c17ba34c89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Hickey
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 07:22:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Add getHostCPUFeatures to query for enabled
fe
https://github.com/arichardson commented:
libunwind changes LGTM, not quite sure about the compiler-rt part.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
@@ -1095,6 +1095,8 @@ class StructAccessBase
return Visit(E->getBase());
}
const Expr *VisitCastExpr(const CastExpr *E) {
+if (E->getCastKind() == CK_LValueToRValue)
+ return E;
efriedma-quic wrote:
Should this be `return IsExpectedRecordDecl(
@@ -119,6 +119,16 @@ namespace cwg109 { // cwg109: yes
};
}
+namespace cwg110 { // cwg110: 2.8
+template
+void f();
+
+class f;
+
+template
+void f(int);
+} // namespace cwg110
zygoloid wrote:
It'd be nice to also check that `class f` works here, and that
bwendling wrote:
> > This is why I believe the gcc behavior is correct. When it knows the size
> > given to `malloc` it uses that. When it doesn't know that it simply returns
> > INT_MAX. When you ask gcc for the `__bdos` of the FAM it will use the
> > `count` to calculate the size.
>
> (nit:
https://github.com/pow2clk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106146
>From 40224473a7b43bc4ffe2024ab51196c2130bedc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Roth
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:00:03 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [DirectX] Remove trivially dead functions at linkage
finalize
https://github.com/isuckatcs updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110099
>From 570ce88b1e5a3839eca8adf4f567fc7547b6f661 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: isuckatcs <65320245+isucka...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 11:43:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang-tidy] Port
isuckatcs wrote:
@EugeneZelenko can you please take a look at the changes once again and let us
know if you're happy with them?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/kyulee-com updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106602
>From d75c88f55a8e271ab8ad6c2a8ef3383dafdf8516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyungwoo Lee
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:28:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [NFC] Refactor ThinBackend
- Change it to a type from a
EugeneZelenko wrote:
@isuckatcs: I mostly check documentation, so will be good idea if somebody from
active developers will take a look in addition to @5chmidti.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff d2457e6d8f62a12b3b74791cfd3f5808168c8a71
526a16a6b9692ddc121f4324e5e50653b75d82e9 --e
https://github.com/peilin-ye updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
>From 7a3c9741ec7a5680b0a59ed7c0316a71c78ccf48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peilin Ye
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 06:44:21 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [BPF] Rename isST*() and isLD*() functions in
BPFMISimplifyPat
https://github.com/peilin-ye edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
isuckatcs wrote:
I see. Hopefully someone will take a look then and we can merge the patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/topperc commented:
Why doesn't any test catch it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
peilin-ye wrote:
Thanks for all your suggestions! Main changes in patchset v5:
1. use `-mcpu=v4` instead of `-mcpu=v5`
2. make both load-acquire and store-release `BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC` insns,
instead of introducing new mode modifiers:
`BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC` insns use a subset of `BPFArithOp<
Author: Alex Bradbury
Date: 2024-10-08T07:42:29+01:00
New Revision: 975da028f78546729f0e78711a4b92107c92ec8e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/975da028f78546729f0e78711a4b92107c92ec8e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/975da028f78546729f0e78711a4b92107c92ec8e.diff
https://github.com/asb closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100937
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Brandon Wu (4vtomat)
Changes
We currently have over 67000 intrinsics, uint16_t will overflow.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaRISCV.cpp (+1
https://github.com/4vtomat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111481
We currently have over 67000 intrinsics, uint16_t will overflow.
>From f6a27f7de2459e22961555054b92a61a0e7ededf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:03:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [
keith-packard wrote:
> With [my series to fix
> `arch/powerpc`](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nathan/linux.git/log/?h=b4/powerpc-fix-stackprotector-test-clang)
> for this implementation applied to Linux, `CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR` is
> properly set and the Linux kernel dump
jerryzj wrote:
> Why doesn't any test catch it?
I suppose the
[CI](https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/actions/runs/11216383892/job/31175562939)
of intrinsic doc should catch this, but it is not reporting errors as expected.
I happen to notice the failures and working on a fix n
Rajveer100 wrote:
Thanks for the approval @cor3ntin, could you land this for me?!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96301
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// The -time option prints timing information for the various subcommands in a
+// format similar to that used by gcc. When compiling and linking, this will
+// include the time to call clang-${LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR} and the linker. Since
+// the name of the linker
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100937
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111465
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kyulee-com updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108614
>From 1cac61d42d7965a095aba3b47cca1f5e3c27fd82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyungwoo Lee
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:51:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [CGData][ThinLTO] Global Outlining with Two-CodeGen
Round
https://github.com/ywgrit created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
None
>From 32aae75a78fbd10c8238494b9b01b85f576a47a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xin Wang
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:03:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [lld][LoongArch] Enable relaxation when --relax option is
passed
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109165
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (ywgrit)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp (+7)
- (modified) lld/ELF/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: None (ywgrit)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp (+7)
- (modified) lld/ELF/Writer.cpp (+4-1)
- (modified)
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
ywgrit wrote:
The relaxation-related code will be added later, except for alignment, which
has been tested locally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
ywgrit wrote:
@MaskRay @SixWeining @wangleiat
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Thomas Fransham
Date: 2024-10-08T09:22:19+03:00
New Revision: 1f2c08b33b848dfdfeecdc7cee3644591407e219
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f2c08b33b848dfdfeecdc7cee3644591407e219
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f2c08b33b848dfdfeecdc7cee3644591407e219.dif
https://github.com/vgvassilev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109321
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108276
>From fff6064a63ddf85857ea5036333866317a156ffc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Fransham
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 02:22:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang] Add explicit visibility symbol macros and updat
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 62ae01201fc7185aca61d040c4f2df5303bae0ad
9c5966efe2e45bc4118fba6944a8e68dfad09419 --e
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+//===--- Mustache.h -*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/PeterChou1 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
401 - 461 of 461 matches
Mail list logo