@@ -3096,6 +3096,15 @@ Instruction
*InstCombinerImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
}
}
+ // nusw + nneg -> nuw
+ if (GEP.hasNoUnsignedSignedWrap() && !GEP.hasNoUnsignedWrap() &&
+ all_of(GEP.indices(), [&](Value *Idx) {
+return isKnown
https://github.com/HighCommander4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
>From d7ec29dc8852c4ae8b239daff11acc42caf4d544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 01:45:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/U
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Nathan Ridge (HighCommander4)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109367
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111282.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/UseRa
HighCommander4 wrote:
> It crashes most likely because a local variable is captured in the static
> lambda.
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/bf895c714e1f8a51c1e565a75acf60bf7197be51/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/boost/UseRangesCheck.cpp#L208
Nice find! That does seem to be the prob
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
https://github.com/zyn0217 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
The special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl caused a regression, as reported in
#110785.
This also merged the test for #84020 together with that of #110785 into clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-e
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
>From e6d3e6f1df5db1618c7302adac4b45b7aa451a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:28:58 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Track function template instantiation from definition
@@ -1994,8 +1995,10 @@
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
// Link the instantiation back to the pattern *unless* this is a
// non-definition friend declaration.
if (!InstTemplate->getInstantiatedFromMemberTemplate() &&
- !
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107786
>From e9948a1004cc2b486a0422d83e88392754e9f7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:17:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent recovery call expression from proceeding
w
https://github.com/nicovank approved this pull request.
LGTM, nits. Maybe give a bit of time for others to take a look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s bugprone-sizeof-expression %t -- \
+// RUN: -config="{CheckOptions: [{key:
bugprone-sizeof-expression.WarnOnSizeOfPointerArithmeticWithDivisionScaled,
value: 0}]}"
nicovank wrote:
```suggestion
// RUN: %check_cla
https://github.com/nicovank edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -306,8 +310,13 @@ void SizeofExpressionCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
unaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr(ofKind(UETT_AlignOf)),
offsetOfExpr()))
.bind("sizeof-in-ptr-arithmetic-scale-expr");
+ const auto PtrArithmeticIntege
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ class SizeofExpressionCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
const bool WarnOnSizeOfCompareToConstant;
const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointerToAggregate;
const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointer;
+ const bool WarnOnSizeOfPointerArithmeticWithDivisionScaled;
nic
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107350
>From 9b12c0b5a0b701984a83308273385c53ced29e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 00:25:40 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] CWG2398: improve overload resolution backwards compat
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111273
None
>From 48c833ccac40522a563f6c1610eef409628a45d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:22:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ByteCode] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
cla
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
>From 995603864598bcb826db8477406ee5f17bbe0548 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:46:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Remove the special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl in
Bui
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111277
The special-casing for RequiresExprBodyDecl caused a regression, as reported in
#110785.
This also merged the test for #84020 together with that of #110785 into
clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-requires-exp
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110387
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111273.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Program.cpp (+5-7)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pr
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111272
None
>From 9a5ad987040ed16478cd119814dc99ebc3d9d177 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:24:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [StaticAnalyzer] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
--
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111272.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.cpp (+11-15)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot12`
while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/2533
Here is the rel
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T12:11:01-07:00
New Revision: 73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/73683cc1ab0fe79a4b02b956cf3c033250537bff.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/echesakov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
>From 1231a5658bf7dde633e2d84967c6e540b3259e4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egor Chesakov <5292656+echesa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:22:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Allow `Cond
echesakov wrote:
> Can you reword the description to have less wrapping
@arsenm @zahiraam Updated the commit/PR and added more details on the issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/4980
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
https://github.com/echesakov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/echesakov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
I pushed a new implementation for this fix.
I have updated the implementation of InstantiateFunctionDefinition so that it
doesn't depend anymore on having the exact function declaration instantiation
which has the same template context as the definition.
This avoids the more e
@@ -1874,6 +1874,26 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
return true;
break;
}
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_hlsl_elementwise_firstbithigh: {
+if (SemaRef.PrepareBuiltinElementwiseMathOneArgCall(TheCall))
+ ret
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110761
>From 9c69d6584d6b71554aec55f0de52abb4baa9435f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 02:13:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang] omit parentheses in fold expressions with a
single
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110761
>From 9c69d6584d6b71554aec55f0de52abb4baa9435f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 02:13:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [Clang] omit parentheses in fold expressions with a
single
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111248
Checking the decl for every load is rather expensive.
>From 7011cb6a67c154f2d93036dfcaa381f83e070f59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:56:31 +0200
Subject: [
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Checking the decl for every load is rather expensive.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111248.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBlock.cpp (+2-2)
- (m
https://github.com/dougsonos updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111224
>From 02398e6398892dac5d151a6e425bf107213e12a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Wyatt
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:28:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Effect analysis: correctly detect `(f ? a : b)` as
nonblockin
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/7135
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-arm-ubuntu` running
on `linaro-lldb-arm-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/18/builds/4972
Here is the relevant piece of the build log
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-solaris11-sparcv9`
running on `solaris11-sparcv9` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/2705
Here is the relevant piece of t
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-10-05T18:46:21+02:00
New Revision: 020b8e8f8dfef2392351e66215d11cccb573a88f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/020b8e8f8dfef2392351e66215d11cccb573a88f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/020b8e8f8dfef2392351e66215d11cccb573a88f.diff
LO
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T09:49:49-07:00
New Revision: 8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8aa76d34ea95031abed32761251951c5f87492c6.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111227
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-05T09:51:12-07:00
New Revision: e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e8f01b0557354a28d17bfe618df5e257ec3e982a.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
>From 2e3d116613a7441b31036cf603d581db6e0afe9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:00:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Basic] Avoid repeated hash lookups (NFC)
---
clang/li
@@ -92,11 +92,10 @@ parseTargetIDWithFormatCheckingOnly(llvm::StringRef
TargetID,
if (Sign != '+' && Sign != '-')
return std::nullopt;
bool IsOn = Sign == '+';
-auto Loc = FeatureMap->find(Feature);
+auto [Loc, Inserted] = FeatureMap->try_emplace(Feature,
kazutakahirata wrote:
Please take a look. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -menable-no-infs
-fapprox-func\
+// RUN: -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-signed-zeros -mreassociate
-freciprocal-math\
+// RUN: -ffp-c
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-arm64-windows-msvc`
running on `linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-04` while building `clang` at step 5
"ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/2552
Here is the relev
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -menable-no-infs
-fapprox-func\
+// RUN: -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-signed-zeros -mreassociate
-freciprocal-math\
+// RUN: -ffp-c
https://github.com/echesakov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105912
>From 124a1c4c7c102421b74eaaa1133ea58a9017e07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egor Chesakov <5292656+echesa...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 18:44:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Allow
echesakov wrote:
> Not very clear to me what the issue is. Can you please explain this in the
> description. I think here the `#pragma float_control(precise, on)` should be
> taking precedence over the `-ffast-math` flag and it's not. Right?
@zahiraam Correct, this is not happening right now a
https://github.com/cjappl approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/cjappl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/davidtrevelyan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
>From cb9d14bf2341f8570f29124ec26460811aa9eba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Trevelyan
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:34:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [NFC][rtsan] Update docs to include [[clang::blockin
@@ -58,31 +58,71 @@ code.
return 0;
}
# Compile and link
- % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime -g example_realtime_violation.cpp
+ % clang++ -fsanitize=realtime example_realtime_violation.cpp
If a real-time safety violation is detected in a ``[[clang::nonblocking]]`
https://github.com/mizvekov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
…on templates
When instantiating a class template, we would lose track of function template
explicit specializations, marking them with the wrong specialization kind.
This would lead to improperly using the e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
…on templates
When instantiating a class template, we would lose track of function template
explicit specializations, marking them with the wrong specialization kind.
This would lead to improperly using
Author: davidtrevelyan
Date: 2024-10-05T13:46:32-07:00
New Revision: 47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47e6d1816251e90b3d589710c5203a92c6015a7c.diff
https://github.com/cjappl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 10 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/6650
Here is the r
@@ -5185,9 +5189,24 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
RebuildTypeSourceInfoForDefaultSpecialMembers();
SetDeclDefaulted(Function, PatternDecl->getLocation());
} else {
+NamedDecl *ND = Function;
+std::optional> I
@@ -492,8 +489,10 @@ MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList
Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs(
// has a depth of 0.
if (const auto *TTP = dyn_cast(CurDecl))
HandleDefaultTempArgIntoTempTempParam(TTP, Result);
-CurDecl = Response::UseNextDecl(CurDecl).NextDecl;
- }
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Makes sense to me, but I'd like to @erichkeane to have a look as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ namespace UsesThis {
auto h() -> decltype(this); // expected-error {{'this' cannot be used
in a static member function declaration}}
};
- template struct A; // expected-note 3{{in instantiation of}}
+ template struct A; // expected-note {{in insta
@@ -5185,9 +5189,24 @@ void Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
RebuildTypeSourceInfoForDefaultSpecialMembers();
SetDeclDefaulted(Function, PatternDecl->getLocation());
} else {
+NamedDecl *ND = Function;
+std::optional> I
bradh352 wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108241
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1994,8 +1995,10 @@
TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitFunctionTemplateDecl(FunctionTemplateDecl *D) {
// Link the instantiation back to the pattern *unless* this is a
// non-definition friend declaration.
if (!InstTemplate->getInstantiatedFromMemberTemplate() &&
- !
@@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ namespace UsesThis {
auto h() -> decltype(this); // expected-error {{'this' cannot be used
in a static member function declaration}}
};
- template struct A; // expected-note 3{{in instantiation of}}
+ template struct A; // expected-note {{in insta
@@ -4206,18 +4206,14 @@ Sema::InstantiateClassMembers(SourceLocation
PointOfInstantiation,
if (Function->hasAttr())
continue;
-MemberSpecializationInfo *MSInfo =
-Function->getMemberSpecializationInfo();
-assert(MSInfo && "No memb
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111225
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111227
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -92,11 +92,10 @@ parseTargetIDWithFormatCheckingOnly(llvm::StringRef
TargetID,
if (Sign != '+' && Sign != '-')
return std::nullopt;
bool IsOn = Sign == '+';
-auto Loc = FeatureMap->find(Feature);
+auto [Loc, Inserted] = FeatureMap->try_emplace(Feature,
https://github.com/davidtrevelyan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111249
Updates the RealtimeSanitizer documentation to:
- include information about how to use `[[clang::blocking]]`, and
- update the displayed error messages to the latest style
@cjappl for review
>From cb9d
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (davidtrevelyan)
Changes
Updates the RealtimeSanitizer documentation to:
- include information about how to use `[[clang::blocking]]`, and
- update the displayed error messages to the latest style
@cjappl for review
---
Full diff:
spall wrote:
> It is not correct to limit firstbithigh to 32 bit integers. There are a
> couple of reasons that might make one think that it is, but we do in fact
> want/need to support int16 and int64 here.
>
> 1. The [HLSL
> docs](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3d
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111258
This is an alternative implementation of the idea present in #109804.
In this implementation, the suppression is purely implemented by a
`BugReportVisitor`, to avoid coupling the suppression with the engine it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
This is an alternative implementation of the idea present in #109804.
In this implementation, the suppression is purely implemented by a
`BugReportVisitor`, to avoid coupling the suppress
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
steakhal wrote:
I implemented my idea of doing this suppression sole within a BugReport visitor
in PR #111258. Let me kn
pskrgag wrote:
CI looks unrelated
```
bk;t=1728134304433Failed Tests (1):
_bk;t=1728134304433 LLVM :: Transforms/InstCombine/and-or-icmps.ll
```
Should I re-trigger it just in case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
___
cfe-commi
Author: Pavel Skripkin
Date: 2024-10-05T17:21:31+02:00
New Revision: fba6c887c110a501b311f6b01721eaf3a5dd994e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fba6c887c110a501b311f6b01721eaf3a5dd994e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fba6c887c110a501b311f6b01721eaf3a5dd994e.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pskrgag created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
`builtin_*_overflow` functions return `_Bool` according to [1].
`BuiltinFunctionChecker` was using `makeTruthVal` for return type, which
creates an `int` value, since it's the type of any compassion according t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Pavel Skripkin (pskrgag)
Changes
`builtin_*_overflow` functions return `_Bool` according to [1].
`BuiltinFunctionChecker` was using `makeTruthVal` for return type, which
creates an `int` value, since it's the type of any
https://github.com/pskrgag updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
>From 4f5fc3e12747064b35c490e510c63702afc8a800 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Skripkin
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:58:15 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clang/csa: fix wrong __builtin_*_overflow return type
---
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 91fdfec263ff2b8e88433c4294a550cabb0f2314
4f5fc3e12747064b35c490e510c63702afc8a800 --e
steakhal wrote:
Ideally, I should use a location context and expr pairs a map keys, to make
sure these numbers are kept separate for different stack frames. I leave it for
the reader this time, to not complicate things further. Once we settle, I'll do
that too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pskrgag edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111253
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-10-05T17:35:52+02:00
New Revision: 4e5f8a8f0bf855fdac93fa09b4b82b69339235b9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4e5f8a8f0bf855fdac93fa09b4b82b69339235b9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4e5f8a8f0bf855fdac93fa09b4b82b69339235b9.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111248
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
