llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/7289
Here is the relevan
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-09-30T12:13:21+02:00
New Revision: 79382eb97adff71dbc9d4969431dd4a0967ee7ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/79382eb97adff71dbc9d4969431dd4a0967ee7ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/79382eb97adff71dbc9d4969431dd4a0967ee7ad.diff
L
https://github.com/kyulee-com created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110483
None
>From c1a0219457a3c162d7fa6b9d70750ba7a040d9f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyungwoo Lee
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:02:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [ThinLTO][NFC] Prep for two-codegen rounds
---
cla
zyn0217 wrote:
What's the status here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107768
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
Looks like the regression is due to the sugar preservation caused declaration
referenced by VLAs to make their way into the constraint evaluation, whereas
they don't appear in the instantiation scope.
Do you have any thoughts?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102551
__
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while
building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/25/builds/2899
Here is
https://github.com/ritter-x2a edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109663
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110475.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+3)
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/fixed-point.cpp (+2)
- (
https://github.com/ostannard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
>From 9b2646806978429395232ed596429ef281bcb26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Stannard
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:58:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [ARM] Re-generate a test
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/fp-a
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110475
None
>From b69e9bb4bca8710fae493086e4c4250a5ab1f249 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:14:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Handle DiscardResult fo
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110473
>From f0692e16f08fc40865cc83aa6c3eb73f5d11144a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:57:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Implement CWG 2707 "Deduction guides cannot have a
trail
ostannard wrote:
That rebase picked up a test failure in
`CodeGen/AArch64/sme-callee-save-restore-pairs.ll` which looks related to this
but isn't, I'll rebase again over the fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
___
cfe-commits mailin
https://github.com/ritter-x2a edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109663
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ritter-x2a wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109663
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110091
From 02e1677ed40ef23792943d9b2cb895ba80312ee9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:55:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Improve filtering logic for undesired proto symbols
@@ -75,18 +76,61 @@ bool isPrivateProtoDecl(const NamedDecl &ND) {
if (ND.getIdentifier() == nullptr)
return false;
auto Name = ND.getIdentifier()->getName();
- if (!Name.contains('_'))
-return false;
- // Nested proto entities (e.g. Message::Nested) have top-leve
@@ -75,18 +76,61 @@ bool isPrivateProtoDecl(const NamedDecl &ND) {
if (ND.getIdentifier() == nullptr)
return false;
auto Name = ND.getIdentifier()->getName();
- if (!Name.contains('_'))
-return false;
- // Nested proto entities (e.g. Message::Nested) have top-leve
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2808,27 +2825,63 @@ void ExprEngine::processBranch(const Stmt *Condition,
std::tie(StTrue, StFalse) = *KnownCondValueAssumption;
else {
assert(!isa(Condition));
+ // TODO: instead of this shortcut perha
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2808,27 +2825,63 @@ void ExprEngine::processBranch(const Stmt *Condition,
std::tie(StTrue, StFalse) = *KnownCondValueAssumption;
else {
assert(!isa(Condition));
+ // TODO: instead of this shortcut perha
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -441,10 +441,33 @@ void CoreEngine::HandleCallEnter(const CallEnter &CE,
ExplodedNode *Pred) {
void CoreEngine::HandleBranch(const Stmt *Cond, const Stmt *Term,
const CFGBlock * B, ExplodedNod
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal commented:
Looks convincing. Suppression like this is probably not the best we can
achieve, but if it reduces the FPs by 2-3x, then I'm all in!
I'm putting this PR to the test downstream to see the overall feel we wou
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109804
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2808,27 +2825,63 @@ void ExprEngine::processBranch(const Stmt *Condition,
std::tie(StTrue, StFalse) = *KnownCondValueAssumption;
else {
assert(!isa(Condition));
+ // TODO: instead of this shortcut perhaps it would be better to "rejoin"
+ // the com
https://github.com/labrinea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110297
>From 82047dc021979fe58001b15c740649c3d44dd23b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:37:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [FMV][AArch64] Unify features ssbs and ssbs2.
Accordin
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97602
>From ac405d7516ea92cf3c63220d1bdf0677dd7dd372 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Concatto
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:55:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang][LLVM][AArch64] Add intrinsic for MOVT SME
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109953
>From bef293187f32e4e197035eda299f73a5fd8f8684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: CarolineConcatto
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:53:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][LLVM][AArch64] Add intrinsic for LUTI4 S
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110469
This is the case in C.
>From 4c2de21a53bc6b048c3d7fc8e2a333fd7d13cdcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:00:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Cast
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
This is the case in C.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110469.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+17-6)
- (modified) clang/test/Frontend/fixe
https://github.com/vabridgers created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110471
RFC: This PR is not ready to merge yet, preliminary comments are welcome.
Here are some questions to consider...
Q) Is the name and file location ok in the directory structure?
I initially chose bugpr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (vabridgers)
Changes
RFC: This PR is not ready to merge yet, preliminary comments are welcome.
Here are some questions to consider...
Q) Is the name and file location ok in the directory structure?
I initially chose bugprone a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: None (vabridgers)
Changes
RFC: This PR is not ready to merge yet, preliminary comments are welcome.
Here are some questions to consider...
Q) Is the name and file location ok in the directory structure?
I initially chose bugpr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: None (vabridgers)
Changes
RFC: This PR is not ready to merge yet, preliminary comments are welcome.
Here are some questions to consider...
Q) Is the name and file location ok in the directory structure?
I initially chos
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110473
Closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/98595
>From 0a0654909088b11eb360835999d67cc9d633ef91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:57:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang]
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
Thanks, the logic looks reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110091
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
@@ -75,18 +76,61 @@ bool isPrivateProtoDecl(const NamedDecl &ND) {
if (ND.getIdentifier() == nullptr)
return false;
auto Name = ND.getIdentifier()->getName();
- if (!Name.contains('_'))
-return false;
- // Nested proto entities (e.g. Message::Nested) have top-leve
@@ -75,18 +76,61 @@ bool isPrivateProtoDecl(const NamedDecl &ND) {
if (ND.getIdentifier() == nullptr)
return false;
auto Name = ND.getIdentifier()->getName();
- if (!Name.contains('_'))
-return false;
- // Nested proto entities (e.g. Message::Nested) have top-leve
@@ -75,18 +76,61 @@ bool isPrivateProtoDecl(const NamedDecl &ND) {
if (ND.getIdentifier() == nullptr)
return false;
auto Name = ND.getIdentifier()->getName();
- if (!Name.contains('_'))
-return false;
- // Nested proto entities (e.g. Message::Nested) have top-leve
https://github.com/hokein edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110091
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at
step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/5396
Here is the rel
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang,libcxxabi` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/6
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/8668
Here i
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/8940
Here
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/5436
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang,libcxxabi` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/4448
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/10403
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97602
>From ac405d7516ea92cf3c63220d1bdf0677dd7dd372 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Concatto
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:55:45 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang][LLVM][AArch64] Add intrinsic for MOVT SME
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109953
>From bef293187f32e4e197035eda299f73a5fd8f8684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: CarolineConcatto
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:53:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][LLVM][AArch64] Add intrinsic for LUTI4 S
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/5218
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/5723
H
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/6755
H
https://github.com/ostannard updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
>From 298ea9851435433c24f9ae516ff4fe03ba19521c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Stannard
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:58:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [ARM] Re-generate a test
---
llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/fp-a
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang,libcxxabi`
at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/5840
Here is the
zygoloid wrote:
Should this have `-fclang-abi-compat` support?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110247
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110478
We shouldn't do this check for fixed-point values, at least the current
interpreter doesn't do it.
>From 2be9e0aa010451324cd3a1e873fb8640535823d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
D
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We shouldn't do this check for fixed-point values, at least the current
interpreter doesn't do it.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110478.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2024-09-30T10:48:30+01:00
New Revision: 9f3728d15721830ef1d29a8ae1af97124bc26b47
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f3728d15721830ef1d29a8ae1af97124bc26b47
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f3728d15721830ef1d29a8ae1af97124bc26b47.diff
https://github.com/Keenuts approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110306
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -323,12 +342,13 @@ class ExprEngine {
/// ProcessBranch - Called by CoreEngine. Used to generate successor
/// nodes by processing the 'effects' of a branch condition.
- void processBranch(const Stmt *Condition,
-
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109926
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-09-30T12:01:10+02:00
New Revision: dc6e4805a0a563052c0c8d81628718fcd6acb193
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc6e4805a0a563052c0c8d81628718fcd6acb193
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc6e4805a0a563052c0c8d81628718fcd6acb193.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110469
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
> Should this have -fclang-abi-compat support?
(It seems like we should, although I don’t have direct experience with it.)
This is a bug fix for
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4b163e343cfa54c8d55c9da73c70d58f55ea9df2,
which is released in Clang 18 and Clang 19. Ther
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang,libcxxabi` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/3778
Here is the releva
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110458
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ void FixedAddressChecker::checkPreStmt(const BinaryOperator
*B,
if (!T->isPointerType())
return;
+ // Omit warning if the RHS has already pointer type.
+ // The value may come from a variable and is candidate for a previous warning
+ // from the ch
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
Looks good to me, nice little improvement :)
I reworded a comment in an inline suggestion because I felt that it was a bit
difficult to understand; but feel free to change it further if you'd prefer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
Author: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: 2024-09-30T10:40:57+02:00
New Revision: 93eaa992896d74eddaf51e8e2601fabc41a1e316
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/93eaa992896d74eddaf51e8e2601fabc41a1e316
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/93eaa992896d74eddaf51e8e2601fabc41a1e316.
https://github.com/VitaNuo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/VitaNuo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110467
…edefinition failures.
>From 1557e3b9d672bb1f2fce745d664c039d578e5d0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:39:48 +
Subject: [PATCH] [abi] [ItaniumMangle] Remove a test
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Viktoriia Bakalova (VitaNuo)
Changes
…edefinition failures.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110467.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-concept.cpp (-23)
``diff
diff --git
ostannard wrote:
The libc++ test failures look unrelated, rebased onto current main to check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
https://github.com/Fznamznon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110243
>From 314a8f4d4f8e003881bed0c320f9ee80ba0b8f8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Podchishchaeva, Mariya"
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 04:00:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix static analyzer concerns
It seems in c
Author: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: 2024-09-30T09:29:02+02:00
New Revision: 147558e31c2b8d2986fc13cf6f9e2bf6a120f2e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/147558e31c2b8d2986fc13cf6f9e2bf6a120f2e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/147558e31c2b8d2986fc13cf6f9e2bf6a120f2e6.
https://github.com/VitaNuo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110247
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balázs Kéri
Date: 2024-09-30T09:16:27+02:00
New Revision: 0d384fe978f9675be9fe960940daa2fd599104ed
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0d384fe978f9675be9fe960940daa2fd599104ed
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0d384fe978f9675be9fe960940daa2fd599104ed.diff
L
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107596
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/VitaNuo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110247
>From f8d897f5f3a89a5664e95a45948f9725101aa36f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktoriia Bakalova
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:33:17 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][ItaniumMangle] Mangle friend function templates
@@ -704,6 +704,15 @@ ItaniumMangleContextImpl::getEffectiveDeclContext(const
Decl *D) {
return D->getLexicalDeclContext()->getRedeclContext();
}
+ if (const auto *FTD = dyn_cast(D)) {
+// Member-like constrained friends are mangled as if they were members of
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110458
If a fixed value is assigned to a pointer variable, the checker did emit a
warning. If the pointer variable is assigned to another pointer variable, this
resulted in another warning. The checker now emits warn
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
If a fixed value is assigned to a pointer variable, the checker did emit a
warning. If the pointer variable is assigned to another pointer variable, this
resulted in another warning. The checker now emits wa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
If a fixed value is assigned to a pointer variable, the checker did emit a
warning. If the pointer variable is assigned to another pointer variable, this
resulted in another warning. The ch
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/buil
@@ -243,14 +244,16 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
// operator that was misinterpreted because we are parsing template
// parameters.
// FIXME: This is getting out of hand, write a decent parser.
- if (InExpr && !Line.startsWith(tok::kw_template) &&
+ if
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/6828
Here is the relevant piece of the build
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang,libcxxabi` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/7733
https://github.com/JanekvO closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102913
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
We were missing a load of the value after emitting the MemberExpr. This was
causing __builtin_dynamic_object_size to return 0 incorrectly.
---
Full diff: https://github.
https://github.com/bwendling created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
We were missing a load of the value after emitting the MemberExpr. This was
causing __builtin_dynamic_object_size to return 0 incorrectly.
>From 375a71d114fffb94c16455f476364a7de9e08191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
https://github.com/bwendling edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110475
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-09-30T12:42:18+02:00
New Revision: 3c85102756ca0737e2282794451889cac502389f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c85102756ca0737e2282794451889cac502389f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3c85102756ca0737e2282794451889cac502389f.diff
L
https://github.com/jeanPerier approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110333
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
Thanks for this, but I think the issue is more basic. We should be issuing a
"load" instruction after the `EmitMemberExpr` call. (That's what happens
outside of using this in `__builtin_dynamic_object_size`.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110437
___
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107786
>From e9948a1004cc2b486a0422d83e88392754e9f7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:17:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] prevent recovery call expression from proceeding
w
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110435
>From c52634882631a71fad956a70179b480abf13006a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:01:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] fix overload resolution for object parameters with
top
https://github.com/bwendling milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bwendling edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
friendly ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86960
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2024-09-30T14:40:54+02:00
New Revision: 3d9cf8b397f61f6259049a625f4888a119352e0d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d9cf8b397f61f6259049a625f4888a119352e0d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d9cf8b397f61f6259049a625f4888a119352e0d.dif
1 - 100 of 595 matches
Mail list logo
