https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109907
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96301
>From f42cea250e79efc6ae51139d51ac72adc4fe7bfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:26:36 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Allow class with anonymous union member to be
const-default
https://github.com/kiranchandramohan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109965
>From 3af5907719193ebc5b251b4681c137827550a1d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kiran Chandramohan
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:43:40 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Flang][Driver] Enable the -B option
The option
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+struct A {
Rajveer100 wrote:
Added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96301
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
https://github.com/tcwzxx created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109970
Fix #108015
The mangleNameOrStandardSubstitution function does not add the RD type into the
substitution, which causes the mangling of the \ to be incorrect.
>From cb60af05cd01da679a473538e80dfb22feefc4bb Mon
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: tcwzxx (tcwzxx)
Changes
Fix #108015
The mangleNameOrStandardSubstitution function does not add the RD type into the
substitution, which causes the mangling of the \ to be
incorrect.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/ll
@@ -121,6 +121,25 @@ struct EvalCallOptions {
EvalCallOptions() {}
};
+/// Simple control flow statements like `if` only produce a single state split,
+/// so the fact that they are included in the source code implies that both
+/// branches are possible (at least under some
@@ -121,6 +121,25 @@ struct EvalCallOptions {
EvalCallOptions() {}
};
+/// Simple control flow statements like `if` only produce a single state split,
+/// so the fact that they are included in the source code implies that both
+/// branches are possible (at least under some
bernhardkaindl wrote:
@davide-q: The patch linked from this comment avoids this issue
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101368:
https://github.com/spack/spack/pull/46504#issuecomment-2372520318
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92865
___
tarunprabhu wrote:
The underlying issue is due to `CLOptions.inc` being included in
`FrontendActions.cpp` and `bbc.cpp`. The file contained a number of command
line options and functions, all of which were declared `static`. This PR added
`libflangFrontend` to the list of libraries linked into
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff aae7ac668588192e21a2435da0229fa0f49c231f
cd3960354231edcf3dce4860bc56243b33fc7f01 --e
https://github.com/everythingfunctional updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110023
>From 38b43f6c2d90420c775d4658e7c472b323bfc30e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Richardson
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:25:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][driver] rename flang-new to flang
---
c
https://github.com/everythingfunctional created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110023
This does a global rename from `flang-new` to `flang`. I also removed/changed
any TODOs that I found related to making this change.
>From cd3960354231edcf3dce4860bc56243b33fc7f01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109984
>From 6567a45fca93b81da2ccb0d596aa0be84666eab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:55:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [runtimes] Run backdeployment CI on Github hosted runners
Th
nikic wrote:
Looks like this change has a small negative compile-time impact:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=0c31ea5a09d854d5891eac40629f6a17a66fdcf7&to=ce6c236c965dc1bb5fa2257e17ea253a015705cc&stat=instructions:u
Not obvious to me why that should be.
https://github.com
https://github.com/rlavaee updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107494
>From 5cc499a7abfeb464ebffba6a04017ec1e5304839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahman Lavaee
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 19:14:11 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Deprecate the `-fbasic-block-sections=labels` option.
This f
rlavaee wrote:
> > Just chiming in that I happened to spot the pre-merge check failure looks
> > possibly related.
>
> @jh7370 It's weird I can't reproduce this on my machine.
Fixed. It was an assertion failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107494
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
Author: Brad Richardson (everythingfunctional)
Changes
This does a global rename from `flang-new` to `flang`. I also removed/changed
any TODOs that I found related to making this change.
---
Patch is 81.03 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB belo
https://github.com/joaosaffran updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331
>From 50d21754119ac10c2ee2376ed8f79d12f73cd137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joao Saffran
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:13:51 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Codegen builtin
---
clang/include/clang/Basic/Builtins.
@@ -224,6 +225,34 @@ void RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
&Opts,
else
Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_32e");
}
+
+ if (Opts.CFProtectionBranch) {
+if (checkCFProtectionBranchSupported()) {
+ auto Scheme = Opts.getCFBranchLabelScheme();
+
https://github.com/hekota closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109910
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -48,6 +49,63 @@ Example
$ clang -fsanitize=address -fsanitize-ignorelist=ignorelist.txt foo.c ;
./a.out
# No error report here.
+Usage with UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer
+=
+
+The arithmetic overflow sanitizers ``unsigned-integer-overfl
https://github.com/inbelic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110027
Using clang's `__builtin_bit_cast`, implement the hlsl intrinsic `asint`.
Follows implementation details of `asuint/asfloat`.
Fixes #99091
>From 48ed7afee4dbe3735decff795aac26a6788f2680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
Author: Rahman Lavaee
Date: 2024-09-25T12:03:38-07:00
New Revision: 1911a50fae8a441b445eb835b98950710d28fc88
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1911a50fae8a441b445eb835b98950710d28fc88
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1911a50fae8a441b445eb835b98950710d28fc88.diff
topperc wrote:
I think maybe we should separate -fcf-protection=branch from the Zicfilp
extension being in -march/-mcpu both in the frontend and backend. The encoding
for lpad does not require Zicfilp. Only the assembly processing of the "lpad"
mnemonic does. Even that we could change.
It is
@@ -817,6 +817,37 @@ ASTContext::getCanonicalTemplateTemplateParmDecl(
return CanonTTP;
}
+/// Check if a type can have its sanitizer instrumentation elided.
+/// Determine this by its presence in a SCL alongside its specified categories.
+/// For example:
+/// ignorelist.tx
https://github.com/rlavaee closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-x86_64-debian`
running on `lldb-x86_64-debian` while building `clang,llvm` at step 4 "build".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/162/builds/7163
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/10045
He
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/7978
Here is th
zeroomega wrote:
Hi
This change likely broke the clang build:
```
[4323/4602](116) Building CXX object
tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/LTO.cpp.o
FAILED: tools/lld/ELF/CMakeFiles/lldELF.dir/LTO.cpp.o
/b/s/w/ir/x/w/rc/cxx-rbeirddhris/reclient-cxx-wrapper.sh
/b/s/w/ir/x/w/cipd/bin/clang++
401 - 431 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
