@@ -159,6 +159,20 @@ AMDGPU Support
X86 Support
^^^
+- The MMX vector intrinsic functions from ``*mmintrin.h`` which
+ operate on `__m64` vectors, such as ``_mm_add_pi8``, have been
+ reimplemented to use the SSE2 instruction-set and XMM registers
+ unconditionally.
https://github.com/asl approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexfh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100408
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99308
>From 39de759ac60f2f06953ebe32392c25837ba591f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:21:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] fix assertion failure in invalid delete operator
de
alexfh wrote:
> Can you please add a reference to #100095 in the summary so folks just
> reading the git log have more context w/o going to the commit itself.
>
> I would like to see a more flushed out long-term plan for fixing this
> properly but I think it makes sense.
I've added more detai
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+// These are in a separate file because errors (e.g. incompatible attributes)
currently prevent
+// the AnalysisBasedWarnings pass from running at all.
+
+// This diagnostic is re-enabled an
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+// These are in a separate file because errors (e.g. incompatible attributes)
currently prevent
+// the AnalysisBasedWarnings pass from running at all.
+
+// This diagnostic is re-enabled an
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fblocks -fcxx-exceptions -verify %s
+
+#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wperf-constraint-implies-noexcept"
+
+// Objective-C
+@interface OCClass
+- (void)method;
+@end
+
+void nl14(OCClass *oc) [[clang::nonblocking]] {
+
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
>From f3eec972f66576fdacc578eaea3f158efdf57128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:28:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] clang-doc switched from using relative to absolute
paths
mizvekov wrote:
I don't believe we currently have any code coverage at all for the line
affected.
So with this change, which we don't fully understand, we could be breaking
currently working code, and we could not even be fixing the known broken cases,
as there could be further UB down the li
ilovepi wrote:
Seems to be a formatting issue. `git clang-format` should fix it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Oh, can you also update the title and commit message? You're not really adding
a short circuit, you're just memoizing visited items, and avoiding reprocessing
them.
A bit more context, and a summary of your findings on the changes to output
would also be good to have in the com
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
>From 2b1255de05856e4c79f58d3e4071384ba80a881d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:26:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][Sema] Don't mark VarDecls of bindings in
tuple-li
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
h-vetinari wrote:
> It seems that the Android support in the Dockerfile is broken after a
> refactor last year. I have some changes that get it working again.
I was waiting for your recent PRs to land, but the android failures seem to
persist even after them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Michael137 wrote:
Updated the PR and description with the alternative approach
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniil Kovalev
Date: 2024-07-25T02:13:30+03:00
New Revision: 3f6eb13abf643afec17a73448ede380606531226
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f6eb13abf643afec17a73448ede380606531226
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3f6eb13abf643afec17a73448ede380606531226.diff
https://github.com/kovdan01 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
>From 2b1255de05856e4c79f58d3e4071384ba80a881d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:26:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Sema] Don't mark VarDecls of bindings in
tuple-li
asl wrote:
/cherry-pick 3f6eb13abf643afec17a73448ede380606531226
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asl milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
>From f3eec972f66576fdacc578eaea3f158efdf57128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:28:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] clang-doc switched from using relative to absolute
paths
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#100484
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
>From 761d1b65063a1d91b1bcedee19798ae7fed8d07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 20:27:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] remove USR
---
clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/HTMLGenerator.
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
>From 761d1b65063a1d91b1bcedee19798ae7fed8d07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 20:27:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] remove USR
---
clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/HTMLGenerator.
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM, but can we improve the check for RootPath somehow? I feel like there
should be something we can match there.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir %t
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=html --executor=standalone -p %s --output=%t
+// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/index_json.js -check-prefix=JSON-INDEX
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+
+// JSON-INDEX: var RootPath = "
https://github.com/PeterChou1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Hmm, seems like tests are failing. PTAL.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Thank you for this PR, could please put a little more detail in the summary
since that is what will be seen by folks using git log.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Seems sensible @cor3ntin wdyt?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100142
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
>From f3eec972f66576fdacc578eaea3f158efdf57128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:28:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] clang-doc switched from using relative to absolute
paths
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir %t
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
ilovepi wrote:
Looks like I missed this. Please don’t copy the test file around. To be blunt
this pattern has been brought up in multiple PRs and even in previous
incarnations of this
rprichard wrote:
> I was waiting for your recent PRs to land, but the android failures seem to
> persist even after them.
Yeah that's also what I noticed. My PRs were aimed at getting the Android
Dockerfile buildable again, but once it was buildable, the feature testing
failed.
It _seemed_ t
zygoloid wrote:
It looks like this is working for all other kinds of structured binding because
`EmitDeclare(BindingDecl*, ...)` emits a proper `DILocalVariable` for them. But
it skips `BindingDecl`s that have a holding variable for some reason. Perhaps a
cleaner approach would be to make it h
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
>From f3eec972f66576fdacc578eaea3f158efdf57128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:28:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] clang-doc switched from using relative to absolute
paths
rprichard wrote:
This check in libcxx/cmake/config-ix.cmake seems to break:
```
check_cxx_compiler_flag(-nostdlib++ CXX_SUPPORTS_NOSTDLIBXX_FLAG)
```
It appears that it isn't passing either `-nostdlib++` or `-lc++` to the clang
linker command-line, but then `-lc++` _is_ passed to `ld.lld` becau
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir %t
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
PeterChou1 wrote:
Sorry, the reason why I kept using this pattern is because I copied the same
test setups in the original test for clang-doc
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
Michael137 wrote:
> It looks like this is working for all other kinds of structured binding
> because `EmitDeclare(BindingDecl*, ...)` emits a proper `DILocalVariable` for
> them. But it skips `BindingDecl`s that have a holding variable for some
> reason. Perhaps a cleaner approach would be to
https://github.com/mikerice1969 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100489
Fix static verifer concerns of null pointer checks after dereferencing
the pointer. Update the assert to make it super clear it is not null and
remove the checks.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mike Rice (mikerice1969)
Changes
Fix static verifer concerns of null pointer checks after dereferencing
the pointer. Update the assert to make it super clear it is not null and
remove the checks.
@@ -692,23 +692,22 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
RValue Call =
CGF.EmitCall(E->getCallee()->getType(), callee, E, ReturnValueSlot());
- // Check the supported intrinsic.
+ ASTContext &Context = CGF.getContext();
if
https://github.com/MaxEW707 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99833
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -692,23 +692,22 @@ static RValue emitLibraryCall(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const
FunctionDecl *FD,
RValue Call =
CGF.EmitCall(E->getCallee()->getType(), callee, E, ReturnValueSlot());
- // Check the supported intrinsic.
+ ASTContext &Context = CGF.getContext();
if
rprichard wrote:
> This check in libcxx/cmake/config-ix.cmake seems to break:
>
> ```
> check_cxx_compiler_flag(-nostdlib++ CXX_SUPPORTS_NOSTDLIBXX_FLAG)
> ```
This particular check was already using `check_cxx_compiler_flag` before this
PR, so it was broken(?), but it apparently doesn't matte
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 commented:
```
def FeatureFPU : SubtargetFeature<"fpu","HasFPU","true",
"Enable classic FPU instructions",
[FeatureHardFloat]>;
def FeatureAltivec : SubtargetFeature<"altivec",
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-07-24T19:33:44-07:00
New Revision: 7e7a9069d4240d2ae619cb50eba09f948c537ce3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e7a9069d4240d2ae619cb50eba09f948c537ce3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e7a9069d4240d2ae619cb50eba09f948c537ce3.diff
LOG:
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/3284
Here is the rel
@@ -94,14 +94,15 @@ entry:
;
; MMX Store
+; Note: doesn't actually emit a non-temporal store here.
;
define void @test_mmx(ptr nocapture %a0, ptr nocapture %a1) {
; ALL-LABEL: test_mmx:
; ALL: # %bb.0: # %entry
; ALL-NEXT:movq (%rdi), %mm0
; ALL-NEXT:psrl
Author: Gedare Bloom
Date: 2024-07-24T19:47:11-07:00
New Revision: ccae7b461be339e717d02f99ac857cf0bc7d17fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccae7b461be339e717d02f99ac857cf0bc7d17fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccae7b461be339e717d02f99ac857cf0bc7d17fc.diff
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rprichard wrote:
The previous `llvm_check_compiler_linker_flag` passes the same flag to both the
compile step and the linker step. Apparently, it's like a combined
`check_compiler_flag` and `check_linker_flag`. CMake apparently doesn't
implement this directly
(https://stackoverflow.com/questi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 9
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang-extra".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/330
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-07-25T06:45:48+02:00
New Revision: 8608cc1c89640bd3d8120f24c964af21310253b6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8608cc1c89640bd3d8120f24c964af21310253b6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8608cc1c89640bd3d8120f24c964af21310253b6.diff
LO
https://github.com/njames93 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100461
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BeMg updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85786
>From 708c81609c603c5ea820493e92d8c82cf4620d64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Piyou Chen
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:59:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV][FMV] Support target_clones
---
.../clang/Basic/DiagnosticF
BeMg wrote:
> @BeMg Can you rebase over commit
> [d1e28e2](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1e28e2a7bd4642e6a5ec963a5ca2ad2ba1b2b59)?
Now this patch rebase over
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d1e28e2a7bd4642e6a5ec963a5ca2ad2ba1b2b59.
Majorly, the diff between origin p
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97541
>From 95b653b6a8f65c04eda610761e52772cb4f8ba35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Zheng
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 04:42:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [PowerPC] add TargetParser for PPC target For now only focus
o
Author: Chen Zheng
Date: 2024-07-25T13:46:59+08:00
New Revision: 25482b356e51de1f259b3ac7c785ab34977781b4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25482b356e51de1f259b3ac7c785ab34977781b4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25482b356e51de1f259b3ac7c785ab34977781b4.diff
LO
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97541
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: PeterChou1
Date: 2024-07-25T02:03:20-04:00
New Revision: 1b7631a699e6af7f497548a1ceb5be0570c60ed0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b7631a699e6af7f497548a1ceb5be0570c60ed0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b7631a699e6af7f497548a1ceb5be0570c60ed0.diff
LO
https://github.com/PeterChou1 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Shivam Gupta
Date: 2024-07-25T12:22:40+05:30
New Revision: 26b70707fc2cc0ab8883e6492a4808401a6a4bad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26b70707fc2cc0ab8883e6492a4808401a6a4bad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/26b70707fc2cc0ab8883e6492a4808401a6a4bad.diff
https://github.com/xgupta closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95695
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
401 - 468 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
