https://github.com/ahmedbougacha closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vsapsai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/15
Such searches can be costly and non-intuitive. We've seen complaints from
developers that they don't expect clang to find modules on their own and not in
search paths that developers provide. Keeping the search
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Volodymyr Sapsai (vsapsai)
Changes
Such searches can be costly and non-intuitive. We've seen complaints from
developers that they don't expect clang to find modules on their own and not in
search paths that developers provide. Keep
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Volodymyr Sapsai (vsapsai)
Changes
Such searches can be costly and non-intuitive. We've seen complaints from
developers that they don't expect clang to find modules on their own and not in
search paths that developers provide. Kee
dyung wrote:
@jhuber6 this change seems to be causing build failures on some bots:
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/2129
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/2383
Can you take a look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96561
_
dyung wrote:
> @jhuber6 this change seems to be causing build failures on some bots:
>
> * https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/2129
> * https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/2383
>
> Can you take a look?
Nevermind, I just noticed you already fixed it. Sorry for th
jhuber6 wrote:
> @jhuber6 this change seems to be causing build failures on some bots:
>
> * https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/2129
>
> * https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/2383
>
>
> Can you take a look?
Gah, sorry forgot to suppress that error whe
https://github.com/vsapsai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100011
Don't ask the driver to inspect the local environment but use `cc1` directly.
>From 190e0a04afb71873c5d398ff08057684ca553d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Volodymyr Sapsai
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:46:27 -0700
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Volodymyr Sapsai (vsapsai)
Changes
Don't ask the driver to inspect the local environment but use `cc1` directly.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100011.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/Modules/subd
efriedma-quic wrote:
Empty fields sometimes don't have a corresponding LLVM field number, in order
to make the layout work correctly. We slightly extended the cases where this
applies recently; see #96422.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
___
vsapsai wrote:
Noticed inconsistencies after #15 as I have pre-release Xcode locally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100011
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
dyung wrote:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/2130
Actually I noticed (and I think you already did as well), that there seems to
be a test failure of nvwrapper.c after you fixed the build error. Just wanted
to let you know in case you were not already aware.
https://github.
https://github.com/yabinc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97121
>From 4166d864eaf66113bef884080492ce8d7b3d6b28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yabin Cui
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:11:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][CodeGen] Zero init unspecified fields in initializers
in C (#
https://github.com/pow2clk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100017
Because AvailabilityDiagnostics.rst mistakenly overlined the "Examples"
section, it was included in the generated HLSLDocs page. By demoting it to a
subheader, it shouldn't show up as a top-level HLSLDocs page.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Greg Roth (pow2clk)
Changes
Because AvailabilityDiagnostics.rst mistakenly overlined the "Examples"
section, it was included in the generated HLSLDocs page. By demoting it to a
subheader, it shouldn't show up as a top-level HLSLDocs page.
pow2clk wrote:
See https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HLSL/HLSLDocs.html to see the effect
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
So is it enough to test if the FieldDecl exists in the CGRecordLayout before
asking for the FieldNo? When I do that, there are some other subtle changes
that occur, though maybe those are from other changes...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574
___
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99727
>From 5e50bd5c4a9ed2f9fd0eea1431a2150886c4a00f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Anderson
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 17:53:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][headers] Including stddef.h always redefines NUL
jhuber6 wrote:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/2130
>
> Actually I noticed (and I think you already did as well), that there seems to
> be a test failure of nvwrapper.c after you fixed the build error. Just wanted
> to let you know in case you were not already aware.
Yep
601 - 620 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
