zyn0217 wrote:
Thanks for the prompt review.
> There is an ambiguous case that I'm a little concerned about: if the alias
> template parameter and the underlying template parameter have the same name,
> the synthesized deduction guide may end up with two template parameters with
> the same na
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-07-22T16:37:05+08:00
New Revision: c7bfc41860a6abe5c92dc5afb47348b0c9e69963
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7bfc41860a6abe5c92dc5afb47348b0c9e69963
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7bfc41860a6abe5c92dc5afb47348b0c9e69963.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kovdan01 wrote:
Ping: would be glad to see feedback on the changes from those who are
interested.
Tagging @MaskRay @smithp35
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/yetingk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99849
This fixes issue #63878 caused by creating an integer with zero bitwidth.
>From 44a0091b3e28b5c36f2eebe9e91d5c57f25a5d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 01:18:51 -0700
Subject: [
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Yeting Kuo (yetingk)
Changes
This fixes issue #63878 caused by creating an integer with zero
bitwidth.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99849.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yeting Kuo (yetingk)
Changes
This fixes issue #63878 caused by creating an integer with zero
bitwidth.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99849.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp (+4-
Author: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: 2024-07-22T10:46:29+02:00
New Revision: 20d38158ffbe1e01b74e39d36d4b3bc5e7a63d66
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20d38158ffbe1e01b74e39d36d4b3bc5e7a63d66
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20d38158ffbe1e01b74e39d36d4b3bc5e7a63d
https://github.com/Fznamznon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kovdan01 wrote:
Ping: would be glad to see feedback on the changes from those who are
interested.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
playstation-edd wrote:
Apologies - will do. For the record, there was a failure on builder
llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/1956
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99711
___
cfe-commits mailing list
=?utf-8?q?Don=C3=A1t?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM. I only had one minor question inline.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.l
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -2213,7 +2213,7 @@ void BasicBugReport::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID&
hash) const {
void PathSensitiveBugReport::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &hash) const {
hash.AddInteger(static_cast(getKind()));
hash.AddPointer(&
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -363,6 +397,18 @@ class LazyCompoundVal : public NonLoc {
/// It might return null.
const void *getStore() const;
+ /// This function itself is immaterial. It is only an implementation detail.
+ /// LazyCompoundVal represents only the rvalue, the data (known or unknow
https://github.com/Szelethus updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97407
From 9fed2b7dc5395f487cb91c10eb076bb87e05e9b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f=20Umann?=
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:58:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer][NFC] Add some docs for LazyComp
@@ -2213,7 +2213,7 @@ void BasicBugReport::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID&
hash) const {
void PathSensitiveBugReport::Profile(llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &hash) const {
hash.AddInteger(static_cast(getKind()));
hash.AddPointer(&BT);
- hash.AddString(Description);
+ hash.AddStr
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98621
From 2765bc97d3242d50fd73aedb9e9d38dfdcef814c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:57:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Don't display the offset value in
@@ -9337,6 +9337,32 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, AlignsAfterOpenBracket) {
"\n"
");",
Style);
+ verifyFormat("bool aaa(\n"
+ "const bool &a, const void *aa\n"
+ ") const {\n"
@@ -9337,6 +9337,32 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, AlignsAfterOpenBracket) {
"\n"
");",
Style);
+ verifyFormat("bool aaa(\n"
+ "const bool &a, const void *aa\n"
+ ") const {\n"
https://github.com/legrosbuffle updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99477
>From b423b26cba90288912b3377c39ab4207c9fc95dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clement Courbet
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:47:56 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy][cppcoreguidelines-missing-std-forward] Do
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++23 -verify %s
+
+namespace test1 {
+ template struct Base {
+template requires true
+Base(T);
+ };
+
+ template struct InheritsCtors : public Base {
+using Base::Base;
+ };
+
+ InheritsCtors inheritsCtors
@@ -1426,6 +1727,34 @@ void Sema::DeclareImplicitDeductionGuides(TemplateDecl
*Template,
if (!AddedAny)
Transform.buildSimpleDeductionGuide(std::nullopt);
+ // FIXME: Handle explicit deduction guides from inherited constructors
+ // when the base deduction guides are
https://github.com/hokein commented:
I haven't finished the review yet, some initial comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -936,19 +940,21 @@ Expr *buildIsDeducibleConstraint(Sema &SemaRef,
Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXDeductionGuideName(AliasTemplate));
};
+ TemplateDecl *TD = DeducingTemplate ? DeducingTemplate : AliasTemplate;
+
SmallVector IsDeducibleTypeTraitArgs = {
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++23 -verify %s
+
hokein wrote:
Can you add testcases for the template parameter packs? e.g.
```
template struct B {
B(T...);
};
template struct C : public B {
using B::B;
};
C c(1);
```
https://
@@ -1957,17 +1957,26 @@ class CXXDeductionGuideDecl : public FunctionDecl {
ExplicitSpecifier ES,
const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo, QualType T,
TypeSourceInfo *TInfo, SourceLocation EndLocation,
-
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++23 -verify %s
hokein wrote:
nit: you need to adjust the diagnostic messages after the
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7bfc41860a6abe5c92dc5afb47348b0c9e69963
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
@@ -980,19 +986,69 @@ getRHSTemplateDeclAndArgs(Sema &SemaRef,
TypeAliasTemplateDecl *AliasTemplate) {
return {Template, AliasRhsTemplateArgs};
}
+// Build the type for a deduction guide generated from an inherited constructor
+// [over.match.class.deduct]p1.10:
+// ... the
@@ -980,19 +986,69 @@ getRHSTemplateDeclAndArgs(Sema &SemaRef,
TypeAliasTemplateDecl *AliasTemplate) {
return {Template, AliasRhsTemplateArgs};
}
+// Build the type for a deduction guide generated from an inherited constructor
+// [over.match.class.deduct]p1.10:
+// ... the
@@ -129,15 +129,19 @@ void MissingStdForwardCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder
*Finder) {
unless(anyOf(hasAncestor(typeLoc()),
hasAncestor(expr(hasUnevaluatedContext());
+ auto StaticCast = cxxStaticCastExpr(
+ hasSourceExpression(declRefEx
https://github.com/legrosbuffle updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99477
>From b423b26cba90288912b3377c39ab4207c9fc95dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clement Courbet
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:47:56 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tidy][cppcoreguidelines-missing-std-forward] Do
https://github.com/legrosbuffle edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 7e6a73959ae97b1f9476a90290a492ba90cb950d
43b51e07cbd5d575a82f345913cf663b988907c6 --e
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot1` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/1938
Here is the relevant piece of the bu
Author: Donát Nagy
Date: 2024-07-22T11:44:20+02:00
New Revision: 2bc38dc30bc9baad610925d7e90e724a9d09ee7d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bc38dc30bc9baad610925d7e90e724a9d09ee7d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bc38dc30bc9baad610925d7e90e724a9d09ee7d.diff
LO
https://github.com/NagyDonat closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98621
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef unsigned short __mmask16;
/* Rounding mode macros. */
#define _MM_FROUND_TO_NEAREST_INT 0x00
+#define _MM_FROUND_TIES_TO_EVEN 0x00
RKSimon wrote:
(very pedantic) but _MM_FROUND_TO_NEAREST_TIES_EVEN would more closely keep to
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99843
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98624
>From bbb844893d973f67ecc130595bfe4fe36b2cb707 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:17:29 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][NEON] Add neon target guard to intrinsics
---
clang/
https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Romaric Jodin
Date: 2024-07-22T11:08:56+01:00
New Revision: 46223b5eae1ae25ad0d8ca47ea210c1781cb03fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46223b5eae1ae25ad0d8ca47ea210c1781cb03fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/46223b5eae1ae25ad0d8ca47ea210c1781cb03fc.diff
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann ,
=?utf-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f?= Umann
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97407
_
https://github.com/ahfakt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99859
Fix crash caused by template parameter pack expansion when no instantiation
exist.
From a84e2af497f827996afe9a820904f9f1d2f9fb22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ahmet=20Faruk=20Akta=C5=9F?=
Date: Mon, 2
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ahmet Faruk Aktaş (ahfakt)
Changes
Fix crash caused by template parameter pack expansion when no instantiation
exist.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99859.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/Sem
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ namespace llvm {
/// info. Return true if module is modified.
bool UpgradeDebugInfo(Module &M);
+ /// Copies module attributes to the functions in the module.
+ void CopyModuleAttrToFunctions(Module &M);
kovdan01 wrote:
Nit: it's proba
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+; This file contains the new semantic of the branch-target-enforcement,
sign-return-address.
+; Used for test mixing a mixed link case and also verify the import too in llc.
+
+; RUN: llc %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64
@@ -5278,6 +5278,106 @@ void llvm::UpgradeFunctionAttributes(Function &F) {
}
}
+// Check if the module attribute is present and set to one.
+static bool isModuleAttributeOne(Module &M, const StringRef &ModAttr) {
+ const auto *Attr =
+ mdconst::extract_or_null(M.getMo
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+; This file contains the new semantic of the branch-target-enforcement,
sign-return-address.
+; Used for test mixing a mixed link case and also verify the import too in llc.
+
+; RUN: llc %s -o - | FileCheck %s
kovdan01 wrote:
I suppose it migh
@@ -5278,6 +5278,106 @@ void llvm::UpgradeFunctionAttributes(Function &F) {
}
}
+// Check if the module attribute is present and set to one.
+static bool isModuleAttributeOne(Module &M, const StringRef &ModAttr) {
+ const auto *Attr =
+ mdconst::extract_or_null(M.getMo
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+; This file contains the new semantic of the branch-target-enforcement,
sign-return-address.
kovdan01 wrote:
Nit: in llvm/test/Bitcode/upgrade-branch-protection.ll, you use ';;' for actual
comments and ';' for special RUN and CHECK lines. New
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+;; Test verifies inlining happens cross module when module flags are upgraded.
+;; `foo` and `main` are both old semantic while bar is the new semantic.
+;; Regression test for #82763
+
+; RUN: split-file %s %t
+; RUN: opt -module-summary %t/foo.s -o %t/foo.o
+;
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+; This file contains the new semantic of the branch-target-enforcement,
sign-return-address.
+; Used for test mixing a mixed link case and also verify the import too in llc.
+
+; RUN: llc %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64
sdkrystian wrote:
> > I'm also seeing a hard "missing 'template' keyword prior to dependent
> > template name" error when building the 510.parest_r benchmark from SPEC CPU
> > 2017
>
> Hitting this same error compiling the ares emulator on 19.
Could either of you provide an example @KyunLFA @
Xazax-hun wrote:
This looks good to me as far as the current use/behavior is concerned. That
being said, I think these annotations make sense to some non-pointer types as
well, e.g., integer handles to other system resources. I did not find any
test/functionality for this scenario, so I am OK
https://github.com/brad0 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74025
>From efc4bab5c06cb9655912da9ca7e25e5fd73e2318 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:50:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Remove NetBSD/i386 workaround for FP eval method with
older ve
sdkrystian wrote:
> Independent of the other issues, it looks like this also re-introduces #98878
@nico #98878 still occurs without this patch applied:
```cpp
struct A
{
void f();
};
template
int g(T t)
{
using U = A; // clang 18.1: 'warning: unused type alias 'U''
t.U::f();
}
```
Author: Lukacma
Date: 2024-07-22T12:03:59+01:00
New Revision: dc82c774a74ad7e94d4c555e4cae1025e30f3876
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc82c774a74ad7e94d4c555e4cae1025e30f3876
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dc82c774a74ad7e94d4c555e4cae1025e30f3876.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Lukacma closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1983,17 +1983,14 @@ static bool OpenCLBuiltinToAddr(Sema &S, unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *Call) {
// In OpenCL, __builtin_alloca_* should return a pointer to address space
// that corresponds to the stack address space i.e private address space.
-static bool OpenCLBuilti
@@ -2625,8 +2622,10 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
case Builtin::BI__builtin_alloca_uninitialized:
Diag(TheCall->getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_alloca)
<< TheCall->getDirectCallee();
-if (OpenCLBuiltinAllocaAddrSpace(*th
https://github.com/zyn0217 commented:
Do you have a test against your changes? This also needs a release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99859
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/2858
H
yronglin wrote:
> > It would be nice to have a reproducer. I can't tell the root cause from
> > this error, so I can't use it to strengthen the current tests.
>
> I intend to provide a reproducer. I just can't do it today. So don't wait on
> it as a justification to avoid reverting.
The PR ha
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/2363
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/2667
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/1862
Here is the relevant piece of t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/2343
Here is the relev
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/2030
Here is the
https://github.com/goussepi created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99862
Changes the driver to look for libclang_rt.profile_nosubmission.a instead of
libclang_rt.profile-x86_64_nosubmission.a
>From 8e2d2037bb8c81191e821e0af186c327d6ff4d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Gousse
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (goussepi)
Changes
Changes the driver to look for libclang_rt.profile_nosubmission.a instead of
libclang_rt.profile-x86_64_nosubmission.a
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/9986
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/1973
Here is the relevant piec
@@ -456,6 +458,7 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
IO.mapOptional("EnumKind", T.EnumConvenienceKind);
IO.mapOptional("SwiftCopyable", T.SwiftCopyable);
IO.mapOptional("Methods", T.Methods);
+IO.mapOptional("Tags", T.Tags);
egorzhdan wrote:
@@ -783,51 +783,76 @@ static void ProcessVersionedAPINotes(
}
}
+static std::optional
+UnwindNamespaceContext(DeclContext *DC, api_notes::APINotesManager &APINotes) {
+ if (auto NamespaceContext = dyn_cast(DC)) {
+for (auto Reader : APINotes.findAPINotes(NamespaceContex
https://github.com/Lukacma created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99864
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#98624
>From 9fb427c61f9444e90bad89b14723f1c369f67aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukacma
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:32:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[Clang][NEON] Add neon target
Author: Lukacma
Date: 2024-07-22T12:32:47+01:00
New Revision: c1622cae10c953f327c7ef24d57508eebd84f244
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1622cae10c953f327c7ef24d57508eebd84f244
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1622cae10c953f327c7ef24d57508eebd84f244.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Lukacma closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99864
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Lukacma)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#98624
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99864.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/arm_neon.td (+32-32)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/B
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
Does this need a clang command line option at this point? Would it be possible
to live with a {{-mllvm}} option to turn on signed GOT? I would expect signed
GOT (or not) would be part of a higher-level signing schema and not toggled at
a low-level via cla
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-hexagon-elf` running
on `hexagon-build-02` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/40/builds/698
Here is the relevant piece of the build
ahfakt wrote:
I tried to represent the error with a sample code but can not reproduce. It may
be removed because of unused template function optimization. In my project it
is in a template library which is not a compiled context. I just wanted to
point the issue so someone who is experienced i
kovdan01 wrote:
> Does this need a clang command line option at this point? Would it be
> possible to live with a {{-mllvm}} option to turn on signed GOT? I would
> expect signed GOT (or not) would be part of a higher-level signing schema and
> not toggled at a low-level via clang.
>
> I know
ofAlpaca wrote:
It looks like my release note has conflict.
Should I edit the file through `resolve conflits` and hit `commit merge`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99542
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
cor3ntin wrote:
When you create a new PR, can you try to preserve the history of your commits,
so that we can easily see what you changed? Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99865
This patch adds these new vector sizes for neon:
fpm8x16_t and fpm8x8_t
According to the ARM ACLE PR#323[1].
[1] ARM-software/acle#323
>From fbeca5c357b1a5589757bbb2cac8208f8c9027ab Mon
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (CarolineConcatto)
Changes
This patch adds these new vector sizes for neon:
fpm8x16_t and fpm8x8_t
According to the ARM ACLE PR#323[1].
[1] ARM-software/acle#323
---
Patch is 49.87 Ki
arsenm wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99866
None
>From e0d76b97e386421ac2e653c206f49f827b24e65b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:16:48 +
Subject: [PATCH] Record mainfile name in the Frontend time trace
---
clang/l
https://github.com/legrosbuffle created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99867
... so that downstream checks can override behaviour to do additional
processing.
Refactor the rest of the logic to `handleConstRefFix` (which is also `virtual`).
This is otherwise and NFC.
This is simila
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Utkarsh Saxena (usx95)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99866.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp (+7-1)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Support/TimeProfilerTest.cpp (+3-4)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Clement Courbet (legrosbuffle)
Changes
... so that downstream checks can override behaviour to do additional
processing.
Refactor the rest of the logic to `handleConstRefFix` (which is also `virtual`).
This is otherwise and NFC.
Th
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
> When you create a new PR, can you try to preserve the history of your
> commits, so that we can easily see what you changed? Thanks
Sure, I'd be happy to do that! I will put the new changes in a separate commit.
😁
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
_
https://github.com/Lukacma created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99870
This patch improves reported error when NEON intrinsics are used without neon
target feature.
>From 8e4c016a2ce0cf8dcbd8dc75f080058bb8d814fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Lukacma)
Changes
This patch improves reported error when NEON intrinsics are used without neon
target feature.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99870.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+struct X {};
+namespace NS {
+bool operator==(X, X);
+}
+using namespace NS;
+struct Y {
+X x;
+friend bool operator==(Y, Y);
+};
+bool operator==(Y, Y) = default;
--
101 - 200 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
