Sirraide wrote:
Ah, that was in the original stack trace, I see. The fix here makes sense to me
because it’s in `FastEvaluateAsRValue`, so it makes sense that that can fail
since it’s just supposed to be a fast path.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97146
_
jhuber6 wrote:
> > You could theoretically break this if you didn't go through the C ABI and
> > ignored type promotion, but I'm not concerned with that kind of misuse
> > since it's against the ABI in the first place.
>
> The IR has its own ABI that may or may not match whatever the platform
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot1` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/835
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
@@ -1342,8 +1342,10 @@ static void InitializePredefinedMacros(const TargetInfo
&TI,
getLockFreeValue(TI.get##Type##Width(), TI));
DEFINE_LOCK_FREE_MACRO(BOOL, Bool);
DEFINE_LOCK_FREE_MACRO(CHAR, Char);
-if (LangOpts.Char8)
- DEFINE_LOCK_F
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void g() {
#endif
} // namespace cwg2877
-namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 tentatively ready 2024-04-19
+namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 ready 2024-04-19
Sirraide wrote:
We’re already rejecting the ill-formed example in question, but
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ void Flang::AddAMDGPUTargetArgs(const ArgList &Args,
StringRef Val = A->getValue();
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString("-mcode-object-version=" + Val));
}
+
+ const ToolChain &TC = getToolChain();
+ TC.addClangTargetOptions(Args, CmdArgs, Actio
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void g() {
#endif
} // namespace cwg2877
-namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 tentatively ready 2024-04-19
+namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 ready 2024-04-19
Sirraide wrote:
We do still need a test for template deduction, though, because
@@ -5888,12 +5888,16 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const
GlobalDecl GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
case Builtin::BI__builtin_printf:
case Builtin::BIprintf:
if (getTarget().getTriple().isNVPTX() ||
-getTarget().getTriple().isAMDGCN()) {
+getTarget
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
>From 35bfcfbc69ee812c59350440b7b15c5e23ad1307 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jannick Kremer
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 22:12:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libclang/python] Refactor enum usage
Use Python's bui
Author: temyurchenko
Date: 2024-07-01T09:25:27-04:00
New Revision: 48f13d48a88c14acbaea7c3ee05018bb173fb360
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48f13d48a88c14acbaea7c3ee05018bb173fb360
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48f13d48a88c14acbaea7c3ee05018bb173fb360.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93913
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -10,26 +10,6 @@
class TestTokenKind(unittest.TestCase):
-def test_constructor(self):
DeinAlptraum wrote:
So the existing "custom" enum implementation included a sort of constructor, as
we see in this test, that takes a number and name and then adds t
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/DeinAlptraum edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95608
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/CedricSwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94865
>From 012849c5410960001ca5bbcb90ea2cf4a661b840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cedric Schwarzer
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:52:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Improve error message for invalid lambda captures
---
c
https://github.com/Szelethus updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95408
From 90cedd519da8b76c686db9c3f824b6d044e16eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Krist=C3=B3f=20Umann?=
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:31:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [analyzer] Check the correct first and la
@@ -134,23 +134,23 @@ struct A {
} // namespace cwg2858
-namespace cwg2877 { // cwg2877: 19 tentatively ready 2024-05-31
+namespace cwg2877 { // cwg2877: 19 ready 2024-06-26
#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
enum E { x };
void f() {
int E;
- using enum E; // OK, names ::E
+
cjappl wrote:
Pinging reviewers @vitalybuka @MaskRay @zygoloid
All the comments on this PR have been addressed, looking for more feedback, or
approval/merge if we are getting close! Thanks in advance :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
__
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97090
>From 789ec614d285e3fe632aae6280f6c4cf01746cdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:27:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][OpenMP] Implement `isOpenMPExecutableDirective
@@ -709,10 +709,44 @@ bool
clang::isOpenMPExecutableDirective(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind) {
return Cat == Category::Executable || Cat == Category::Subsidiary;
}
+bool clang::isOpenMPCapturingDirective(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind) {
+ if (isOpenMPExecutableDirective(DKind)) {
Author: CedricSWA
Date: 2024-07-01T15:38:45+02:00
New Revision: 51d87aa4380046588124c2e474924cd8f57189db
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/51d87aa4380046588124c2e474924cd8f57189db
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/51d87aa4380046588124c2e474924cd8f57189db.diff
LOG
https://github.com/Sirraide closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94865
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@CedricSwa Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a buil
https://github.com/weliveindetail updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97071
From ca2ab5f9e3470e87923c7b950b7b06e5ff21119e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Gr=C3=A4nitz?=
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:43:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-repl] Fix RuntimeInterfaceBu
weliveindetail wrote:
Thanks for your feedback everyone!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smithp35 approved this pull request.
LGTM from me too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91280
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dmcardle created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97293
This PR reverts #95290 and the one-liner followup PR #96494.
I received some substantial feedback on #95290, which I plan to address in a
future PR.
I've also received feedback that because the change emits er
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dan McArdle (dmcardle)
Changes
This PR reverts #95290 and the one-liner followup PR #96494.
I received some substantial feedback on #95290, which I plan to address
in a future PR.
I've also received feedback that because the change emits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Dan McArdle (dmcardle)
Changes
This PR reverts #95290 and the one-liner followup PR #96494.
I received some substantial feedback on #95290, which I plan to address
in a future PR.
I've also received feedback that because the cha
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97199
>From 81910b6d8139868304c87784416e087e2aea9f7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:32:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Fix crash in Stream checker when using void
poin
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97199
>From 81910b6d8139868304c87784416e087e2aea9f7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:32:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Fix crash in Stream checker when using void
poin
yronglin wrote:
Friendly ping~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90574
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 0d88f662ff4db7e78a6c48db79ef62c5228d5f2a
783f56be1bacdce768ebc11e8566171a9693becf --
steakhal wrote:
> Overall, I'd say that it's futile to try to recognize zero-sized types with a
> "canonical type equal to" check, so you should just check whether
> `ElemSizeInChars` is zero and do something based on that. (Either an early
> return, or you can say `ElemSizeInChars = 1` at tha
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Revert LGTM, I'll push the changes momentarily as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
Author: Dan McArdle
Date: 2024-07-01T09:47:09-04:00
New Revision: d6987606872a4152495cca0c52b3261b7c44f3ee
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6987606872a4152495cca0c52b3261b7c44f3ee
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6987606872a4152495cca0c52b3261b7c44f3ee.diff
L
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
Ah yes, libc code doing the equivalent of va_arg assuming natural alignment
when the underlying buffer is a packed struct with fields padded to four bytes
would not work. That would be "fixed" by changing the compiler to match the
assumption made by libc, but it seems mu
doru1004 wrote:
> The code changes look good now, but I'd prefer to have a non-SPMD mode test
> case.
All good @shiltian ? The test you requested was added Friday.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
Looks good. I only had some minor remarks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
LGTM, straightforward change. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
steakhal wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
Let's merge this again, after the Z3 version there shouldn't be any additional
problems.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-07-01T16:03:18+02:00
New Revision: b3b0d09ccee52472691570072ac0e30f1addbb0a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3b0d09ccee52472691570072ac0e30f1addbb0a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3b0d09ccee52472691570072ac0e30f1addbb0a.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,6 +30,22 @@ struct LOCKABLE Mutex {};
struct Foo {
struct Mutex *mu_;
+ int a_value GUARDED_BY(mu_);
+
+ struct Bar {
+struct Mutex *other_mu ACQUIRED_AFTER(mu_);
pdherbemont wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure how nested structs work in C, but sho
AaronBallman wrote:
CC @jakubjelinek for awareness
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
In general, I like this! LGTM, though please give others a chance to review
before landing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97274
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ a
};
// CHECK: store i32 107, ptr %b, align 4
-int b =
+int b = (
#embed
+)
AaronBallman wrote:
Oh nice, these changes fixed a bug -- this code should not have compiled before.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97274
__
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/python3kgae edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pdherbemont updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95455
>From 4edb5194a6c03cf7bcf18eb998728da7cbc51dc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre d'Herbemont
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:20:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support `guarded_by` attribute and related attributes in
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97298
This is exactly as originally landed in #95129,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/bump-minimal-z3-requirements-from-4-7-1-to-4-8-9/79664/4
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
This is exactly as originally landed in #95129,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/bump-min
@@ -113,7 +113,11 @@ static T PickFP(const llvm::fltSemantics *Sem, T
IEEEHalfVal, T IEEESingleVal,
static void DefineFloatMacros(MacroBuilder &Builder, StringRef Prefix,
const llvm::fltSemantics *Sem, StringRef Ext) {
- const char *DenormMin, *
steakhal wrote:
This is the continuation patch of #97265.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -764,12 +764,6 @@ doesn't know that munl.mu == mutex. The SCOPED_CAPABILITY
attribute handles
aliasing for MutexLocker, but does so only for that particular pattern.
-ACQUIRED_BEFORE(...) and ACQUIRED_AFTER(...) are currently unimplemented.
--
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
LG
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/doru1004 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97065
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
I've passed some types to nvcc on godbolt and tried to decode the results. It
looks like it's passing everything with natural alignment, flattened, with
total disregard to the minimum slot size premise clang uses.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96369
_
https://github.com/pdherbemont updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95455
>From 2a8eb78119421fa63f635f9f4e5edad18c635d9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre d'Herbemont
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:20:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support `guarded_by` attribute and related attributes in
@@ -215,7 +219,10 @@ void NVPTXABIInfo::computeInfo(CGFunctionInfo &FI) const {
RValue NVPTXABIInfo::EmitVAArg(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Address VAListAddr,
QualType Ty, AggValueSlot Slot) const {
- llvm_unreachable("NVPTX does not support varargs")
@@ -942,6 +942,36 @@ struct Amdgpu final : public VariadicABIInfo {
}
};
+struct NVPTX final : public VariadicABIInfo {
+
+ bool enableForTarget() override { return true; }
+
+ bool vaListPassedInSSARegister() override { return true; }
+
+ Type *vaListType(LLVMContext &Ct
https://github.com/JonChesterfield edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96369
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Some minor corrections for grammar.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental Non Ca
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental Non Ca
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental Non Ca
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental Non Ca
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental Non Ca
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96453
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -157,6 +157,13 @@ here. Generic improvements to Clang as a whole or to its
underlying
infrastructure are described first, followed by language-specific
sections with improvements to Clang's support for those languages.
+- Clang implemented improvements to BMI of C++20 Modu
@@ -942,6 +942,36 @@ struct Amdgpu final : public VariadicABIInfo {
}
};
+struct NVPTX final : public VariadicABIInfo {
+
+ bool enableForTarget() override { return true; }
+
+ bool vaListPassedInSSARegister() override { return true; }
+
+ Type *vaListType(LLVMContext &Ct
@@ -942,6 +942,36 @@ struct Amdgpu final : public VariadicABIInfo {
}
};
+struct NVPTX final : public VariadicABIInfo {
+
+ bool enableForTarget() override { return true; }
+
+ bool vaListPassedInSSARegister() override { return true; }
+
+ Type *vaListType(LLVMContext &Ct
@@ -54,7 +54,34 @@ class MockArgList {
}
template LIBC_INLINE T next_var() {
-++arg_counter;
+arg_counter++;
+return T(arg_counter);
+ }
+
+ size_t read_count() const { return arg_counter; }
+};
+
+// Used by the GPU implementation to parse how many bytes ne
kovdan01 wrote:
@ahmedbougacha
> I should mention that in our world we generally don't expect these to be
> common (other than in cc1 invocations), and they're generally used for
> overriding default ABI behavior inferred from triples and deployment targets
> and whatnot.
We also don't expe
weiweichen wrote:
> Thank you for the example, I understand what is happening how.
>
> * Before [[AArch64] Decouple feature dependency expansion.
> #94279](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279), we used to add CPU
> features in `AArch64::initFeatureMap`.
> * In [[AArch64] Decouple f
https://github.com/Leporacanthicus updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95411
>From 0ef4b61d0429517b92f7b6de7fa52c516f3a1468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:01:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [flang] Implement -mcmodel flag
This patch implements
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
This should be re-landed as well; when it was merged earlier the only issue was
the incompatibility with old Z3 and that was addressed since then (by bumping
the version requirement).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97298
_
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto approved this pull request.
Thank you @smanna12.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94267
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -964,17 +966,34 @@ static bool
pathOnlyInitializesGslPointer(IndirectLocalPath &Path) {
return false;
}
-void checkExprLifetime(Sema &SemaRef, const InitializedEntity &Entity,
+void checkExprLifetime(Sema &SemaRef, const CheckingEntity &CEntity,
Xazax-hu
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96475
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
Thanks for the updates! I added few minor comments, but the PR is already good
enough to be merged.
> > I only noticed that this PR was already merged after posting the review.
> > There is no need to revert the commit -- it's better th
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1034,16 +1034,16 @@ void StreamChecker::preWrite(const FnDescription *Desc,
const CallEvent &Call,
C.addTransition(State);
}
-static std::optional getPointeeType(const MemRegion *R) {
+static QualType getPointeeType(const MemRegion *R) {
if (!R)
-return std::null
@@ -1034,16 +1034,16 @@ void StreamChecker::preWrite(const FnDescription *Desc,
const CallEvent &Call,
C.addTransition(State);
}
-static std::optional getPointeeType(const MemRegion *R) {
+static QualType getPointeeType(const MemRegion *R) {
if (!R)
-return std::null
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
@@ -290,8 +290,24 @@ StringRef riscv::getRISCVArch(const llvm::opt::ArgList
&Args,
// 2. Get march (isa string) based on `-mcpu=`
if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ)) {
StringRef CPU = A->getValue();
-if (CPU == "native")
+if (CPU == "nativ
https://github.com/Leporacanthicus edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96921
>From f2251efabbc1a59e87b25285f7173161e6f63d22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:13:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF-8
101 - 200 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
