https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
>From b77b2d9b10ad90ee67893904732003bf11eec21d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:47:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Move the builtin workaround logic to the lexer
---
@@ -1673,6 +1673,7 @@ void Preprocessor::ExpandBuiltinMacro(Token &Tok) {
return II && HasExtension(*this, II->getName());
});
} else if (II == Ident__has_builtin) {
+EvaluatingHasBuiltinMacro = true;
Endilll wrote:
I'm not particularly pro
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
---
Patch is 83.35 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097.diff
19 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+4)
- (modified) clang
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94693
>From 5d7ebf65f321735debcd919aae6b6dcb4ed5537f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Introduce [[clang::coro_inplace_task]]
---
clang/in
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff cd0f89109bf90442cab8cfeaf5fce17cbddeef73
5d7ebf65f321735debcd919aae6b6dcb4ed5537f --
Endilll wrote:
CC @MitalAshok
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
To clear potential confusion, Corentin suggested to me offline to take over
this PR. I fixed the tests and implemented the workaround for `__has_builtin`
case, which surfaced while I was fixing the tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
__
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T18:29:02+02:00
New Revision: df067e567f7793a7c82096df0387a6e6dd31a828
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df067e567f7793a7c82096df0387a6e6dd31a828
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df067e567f7793a7c82096df0387a6e6dd31a828.diff
LO
tschuett wrote:
If this is a new float type, could you please split out the apfloat changes in
separate PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -979,6 +980,17 @@ static llvm::Error serializeIndex(ClangDocContext &CDCtx) {
"error creating index file: " +
FileErr.message());
}
+ llvm::SmallString<128> RootPath(CDCtx.OutDirectory);
+ if (llvm
https://github.com/ilovepi commented:
This is almost there. I've left a few minor comments, but I'd like to see
better testing here. I'm awfully surprised we don't need to update any test
lines, other than the 1 JS check. It would really help to see how the output is
changing, if that was capt
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/docs/GlobalNamespace/Rectangle.html
-check-prefix=HTML-RECTANGLE
// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/docs/GlobalNamespace/Circle.html
-check-prefix=HTML-CIRCLE
+// JSON-INDEX: var RootPath = "{{.*}}";
ilove
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
function genLink(Ref) {
var Path =
`${window.location.protocol}//${window.location.host}/${Ref.Path}`;
+ var isFileProtocol = window.location.protocol.startsWith("file");
+ // we treat the file paths different depending on if we're
+ // serving via a http
@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
function genLink(Ref) {
var Path =
`${window.location.protocol}//${window.location.host}/${Ref.Path}`;
+ var isFileProtocol = window.location.protocol.startsWith("file");
+ // we treat the file paths different depending on if we're
+ // serving via a http
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ function createIndex(Index) {
// Runs after DOM loads
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
- // JsonIndex is a variable from another file that contains the index
- // in JSON format
- var Index = JSON.parse(JsonIndex);
- createIndex(
https://github.com/compnerd approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: David CARLIER
Date: 2024-06-29T18:13:44+01:00
New Revision: 540fd42c755f20f7b79c6c79493ec36d8cb9b3d3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/540fd42c755f20f7b79c6c79493ec36d8cb9b3d3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/540fd42c755f20f7b79c6c79493ec36d8cb9b3d3.diff
https://github.com/devnexen closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
eymay wrote:
Great work, I can imagine how hard it would be to uncover it!
Small note: I think you may also want to remove the Arm macro guards that mask
the unittest in the same commit, as you did in the previous
[PR](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96900/files#diff-9b27f347e7ca15f9
MaskRay wrote:
I agree that we should not add a driver diagnostic.
Using sanitizers with -O2/-O3 is pretty common, especially when user programs
are so large that -O0 is too slow or does not build at all.
I think msan is the most affected sanitizer which will detect fewer bugs.
https://github.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/bu
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97001
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot2` while building `clang,compiler-rt` at step 2
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/772
Here is the relevant pie
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T19:55:29+02:00
New Revision: d957da83791930a3c23f4f936ca7c7644c4b07a4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d957da83791930a3c23f4f936ca7c7644c4b07a4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d957da83791930a3c23f4f936ca7c7644c4b07a4.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T19:55:30+02:00
New Revision: deb039e69ed7efc94ef517809f36298f40359c21
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/deb039e69ed7efc94ef517809f36298f40359c21
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/deb039e69ed7efc94ef517809f36298f40359c21.diff
LO
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97172
This patch continues the effort to split `Sema` up, moving more function to
`SemaObjC`. Additional context can be found in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch continues the effort to split `Sema` up, moving more function to
`SemaObjC`. Additional context can be found in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184 and
https://github.com/llvm/l
smanna12 wrote:
Thank you @antangelo for reviews!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: smanna12
Date: 2024-06-29T13:32:39-05:00
New Revision: f7fec8c80a986e82ef174080a3e07703c7b2c3c6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7fec8c80a986e82ef174080a3e07703c7b2c3c6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7fec8c80a986e82ef174080a3e07703c7b2c3c6.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/smanna12 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97097
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rorth wrote:
This patch broke the
[Solaris/amd64](https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/94/builds/4729)
buildbot.
For god's sake, can you please either test your Illumos patches on Solaris, too
(there are Solaris buildbots in the cfarm for exactly such a purpose) and
finally handle Issue #
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot2` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/776
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97176
This patch is based on clang-tidy's modernize-make-unique but limited
to those cases where type names are mentioned twice like
std::unique_ptr(new Type()), which is a bit mouthful.
>From 84e939e920af0c540
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
This patch is based on clang-tidy's modernize-make-unique but limited
to those cases where type names are mentioned twice like
std::unique_ptr(new Type()), which is a bit mouthful.
---
Fu
devnexen wrote:
oh I see let me figure out a fix, getting into it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ZequanWu wrote:
> @ZequanWu I can't successfully build your reproducer with clang trunk. Would
> it be possible to provide the full test case or a fully reduced one?
Because I reverted this change at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/567b2c608c307c097315dd5ec4d6a5bbcddf898d,
so it n
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T21:10:24+02:00
New Revision: 8d4aa1f22ea08b12a7958b681e8a265f78cb349f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d4aa1f22ea08b12a7958b681e8a265f78cb349f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d4aa1f22ea08b12a7958b681e8a265f78cb349f.diff
LO
philnik777 wrote:
> > @ZequanWu I can't successfully build your reproducer with clang trunk.
> > Would it be possible to provide the full test case or a fully reduced one?
>
> Because I reverted this change at
> [567b2c6](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/567b2c608c307c097315dd5ec4d6
https://github.com/dwblaikie edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dwblaikie approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MitalAshok wrote:
Looks like `!__is_identifier()` is used instead of
`__has_builtin` sometimes. With this patch, `__is_identifier()` is true because there's no lparen after the name
In libc++: 7f302f220e7b8727ed1bf8832dcc2d87b897e527 (Pretty easy fix to replace
`__has_keyword(__reference_binds
ZequanWu wrote:
> > > @ZequanWu I can't successfully build your reproducer with clang trunk.
> > > Would it be possible to provide the full test case or a fully reduced one?
> >
> >
> > Because I reverted this change at
> > [567b2c6](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/567b2c608c307c0
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T21:10:24+02:00
New Revision: 37698d924840a229e5a1bece8f5e845e0f5c80a6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/37698d924840a229e5a1bece8f5e845e0f5c80a6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/37698d924840a229e5a1bece8f5e845e0f5c80a6.diff
LO
https://github.com/MitalAshok approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
philnik777 wrote:
> > > > @ZequanWu I can't successfully build your reproducer with clang trunk.
> > > > Would it be possible to provide the full test case or a fully reduced
> > > > one?
> > >
> > >
> > > Because I reverted this change at
> > > [567b2c6](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T21:10:24+02:00
New Revision: 40f4bd18f2fb01731fa7891fb7349e05dc98aeec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/40f4bd18f2fb01731fa7891fb7349e05dc98aeec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/40f4bd18f2fb01731fa7891fb7349e05dc98aeec.diff
LO
https://github.com/to268 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79845
>From 44d103f75aef4227262b823fd5168c081307ce23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillot Tony
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:14:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Implementation base of N3006 Underspecified object
declarations
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-29T21:10:25+02:00
New Revision: 5a8c4b597beed38e392f221042d29f475a3d1626
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a8c4b597beed38e392f221042d29f475a3d1626
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a8c4b597beed38e392f221042d29f475a3d1626.diff
LO
Endilll wrote:
> Looks like !__is_identifier() is used instead of
> __has_builtin sometimes. With this patch, __is_identifier( trait name>) is true because there's no lparen after the name
Thank you, I'll make `__is_identifier` work.
> Apparantly __has_feature(__is_abstract) is also supposed t
Endilll wrote:
@zygoloid @cor3ntin @AaronBallman in the light of new data in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097#issuecomment-2198314023, do you
think this lex approach to revertible type trait identifiers is still viable?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96097
___
to268 wrote:
I've rebased the branch from main
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79845
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
```
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/uniform_int_dist.h:250:31:
error: expected unqualified-id
static_assert(!_Up_traits::__is_signed, "U must be unsigned");
```
Results from CI are not making this any better.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
MitalAshok wrote:
What if we went in the other direction? We want to deprecate `__is_pointer` as
an identifier, so only make it an identifier when it is being used by libstdc++
as an identifier. libstdc++ usage looks something like:
```c++
// type template
template
struct __is_pointer;
templat
https://github.com/apivovarov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
This PR adds `f8E4M3` type to llvm.
`f8E4M3` type follows IEEE 754 convention
```c
f8E4M3 (IEEE 754)
- Exponent: 4
- Mantissa: 3
- Exponent bias: 7
- Follows IEEE 754 conventions for representation of specia
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Alexander Pivovarov (apivovarov)
Changes
This PR adds `f8E4M3` type to llvm.
`f8E4M3` type follows IEEE 754 convention
```c
f8E4M3 (IEEE 754)
- Exponent: 4
- Mantissa: 3
- Exponent bias: 7
- Follows IEEE 754 conventions for repres
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
apivovarov wrote:
> If this is a new float type, could you please split out the apfloat changes
> in separate PR.
Sure - [PR-97179](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179) Add f8E4M3
IEEE 754 type to llvm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
>From 38a885014046f5e696a98361586919d14362dbed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Pivovarov
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:09:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add f8E4M3 IEEE 754 type to llvm
---
clang/include
https://github.com/apivovarov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
>From 38a885014046f5e696a98361586919d14362dbed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Pivovarov
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:09:33 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add f8E4M3 IEEE 754 type to llvm
---
clang/include
https://github.com/jchlanda updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97028
>From 74eb15f035e4aed1dd19b735ac0b2fc5ad172213 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Chlanda
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:25:56 +
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA][NFC] CudaArch to OffloadArch rename
Rename CudaArch to O
https://github.com/apivovarov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
>From 639ca43f1c57657ecaeb43a097664bae008093fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Pivovarov
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:09:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add f8E4M3 IEEE 754 type to llvm
---
clang/include/cla
apivovarov wrote:
Thorsten, Matt, What you think about adding the following tests?
```c
// E4M3 <-> E5M2
ConvertE4M3ToE5M2
ConvertE5M2ToE4M3
// E4M3 <-> E4M3FN
ConvertE4M3ToE4M3FN
ConvertE4M3FNToE4M3
```
@tschuett @arsenm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
_
efriedma-quic wrote:
I'm concerned that we're calling EvaluateKnownConstInt on an lvalue; that might
indicate there's something wrong with the AST. Usually there should be an
lvalue-to-rvalue cast somewhere.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97146
_
@@ -2220,6 +2220,11 @@ llvm::Constant
*ConstantLValueEmitter::emitPointerAuthPointer(const Expr *E) {
// The assertions here are all checked by Sema.
assert(Result.Val.isLValue());
+ auto *Base = Result.Val.getLValueBase().get();
+ if (auto *Decl = dyn_cast_or_null(Base
temyurchenko wrote:
> Do you need someone to land these changes on your behalf?
Given that the PR is approved, perhaps, yo
> Do you need someone to land these changes on your behalf?
@erichkeane, perhaps you can land these, given that the PR is approved?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-06-29T16:12:18-07:00
New Revision: eb5dbaf8d013839a66691e954a58d22a41f3c027
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb5dbaf8d013839a66691e954a58d22a41f3c027
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb5dbaf8d013839a66691e954a58d22a41f3c027.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97176
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/CedricSwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94865
>From 012849c5410960001ca5bbcb90ea2cf4a661b840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cedric Schwarzer
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:52:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Improve error message for invalid lambda captures
---
c
https://github.com/xingxue-ibm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97076
>From d6a486c4f007297d087fe4454da3ec501e824825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xing Xue
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:25:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Default to -fno-sized-deallocation for AIX.
---
clang/lib/Dr
https://github.com/CedricSwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94865
>From 012849c5410960001ca5bbcb90ea2cf4a661b840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cedric Schwarzer
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:52:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Improve error message for invalid lambda captures
---
c
https://github.com/sstwcw closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96770
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: sstwcw
Date: 2024-06-30T01:20:20Z
New Revision: 2853a838d22b69f61ed376abbd9ab5e625111f44
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2853a838d22b69f61ed376abbd9ab5e625111f44
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2853a838d22b69f61ed376abbd9ab5e625111f44.diff
LOG: [clang
https://github.com/CedricSwa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94865
>From 012849c5410960001ca5bbcb90ea2cf4a661b840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cedric Schwarzer
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:52:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Improve error message for invalid lambda captures
---
c
Author: sstwcw
Date: 2024-06-30T02:04:44Z
New Revision: aec7670b5d6354b63b011c9ed0632b70983b0328
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aec7670b5d6354b63b011c9ed0632b70983b0328
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aec7670b5d6354b63b011c9ed0632b70983b0328.diff
LOG: [clang
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang` at
step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/676
Here is the relev
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97080
>From b49737505ad3ad84e977787daf141b98fe3e6607 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:24:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebAssembly] support getVT from wasm externref and
funcr
Backl1ght wrote:
> I'm concerned that we're calling EvaluateKnownConstInt on an lvalue; that
> might indicate there's something wrong with the AST. Usually there should be
> an lvalue-to-rvalue cast somewhere.
@efriedma-quic lvalue-to-rvalue cast is done here at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97080
>From b49737505ad3ad84e977787daf141b98fe3e6607 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:24:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WebAssembly] support getVT from wasm externref and
funcr
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> What happens if you compile a file that really vectorizes reference types?
> The attached test doesn't seem to actually end up getting vectorized after
> all. Can you add a test that get vectorized?
Is it possible to vectorize external reference types? I don't think there
Author: Takuya Shimizu
Date: 2024-06-30T14:09:10+09:00
New Revision: 6b737c444617fe8c11eb48f978c579cc160bfff0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b737c444617fe8c11eb48f978c579cc160bfff0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b737c444617fe8c11eb48f978c579cc160bfff0.diff
https://github.com/hazohelet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96374
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96921
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93276
>From 0b6d536133f63e078fbde491a8c92c7ec916cb47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 05:18:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang-doc] make loading of json side bar async
---
clang-t
Author: Jakub Chlanda
Date: 2024-06-30T07:56:07+02:00
New Revision: ab200864220b72b3bdf1fe9d001ad3d1e4d9d4b3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ab200864220b72b3bdf1fe9d001ad3d1e4d9d4b3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ab200864220b72b3bdf1fe9d001ad3d1e4d9d4b3.diff
https://github.com/jchlanda closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97028
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
minglotus-6 wrote:
Going to merge as the failed tests are not related to this PR.
```
cat github-pull-requests_build_76910_linux-linux-x64.log | grep -B 2 -A 10
"Failed Tests "
--
Failed Tests (1):
BO
https://github.com/minglotus-6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81442
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PeterChou1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
>From f5872e7c82d097ae3c141765d3f1d7e3d0b25b82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: PeterChou1
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:28:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clang-doc switched from using relative to absolute paths
---
@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
function genLink(Ref) {
var Path =
`${window.location.protocol}//${window.location.host}/${Ref.Path}`;
+ var isFileProtocol = window.location.protocol.startsWith("file");
+ // we treat the file paths different depending on if we're
+ // serving via a http
vfdff wrote:
hi, is there any new suggestion ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic requested changes to this pull request.
This is probably caused by some downstream patches in google3?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyISelLowering.cpp
does not contain any mentions of `M->getFunction` or `M->getCont
https://github.com/Backl1ght created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97146
fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/96670
The cause is that we might return a lvalue here at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/3e53c97d33210db68188e731e93ee48dbaeeae32/clang/lib/AST/ExprC
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zhikai Zeng (Backl1ght)
Changes
fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/96670
The cause is that we might return a lvalue here at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/3e53c97d33210db68188e731e93ee48dbaeeae32/clang/lib/AST/Ex
a-tarasyuk wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
