https://github.com/h-vetinari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93429
>From 8c1b899aa174b107fece1edbf99eaf261bdea516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:45:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [runtimes] [CMake] Use CMAKE_REQUIRED_
@@ -652,6 +652,134 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
https://github.com/vfdff updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96025
>From ed6292fd0e9119322c39e5f37e2225c76e324101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhongyunde 00443407
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [TBAA] Emit int TBAA metadata on FP math libcalls
Base on
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96738
None
>From 0d9ab2bcbaa2b4b11832a8ac1848505cf73f4880 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:40:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clang/AMDGPU: Use atomicrmw for ds fmin/fmax builtins
---
arsenm wrote:
* **#96739** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/96739?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/>
* **#96738** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-proj
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96738.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp (+14-26)
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGenCUDA/builtins-amdgcn.c
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96738
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
These results look correct according to the checker, but I am not sure if such
results are useful or really invalid:
https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/reports?run=vim_v8.2.1920_pointersub1&is-unique=on&diff-type=New&checker-name=alpha.core.PointerSub
In t
https://github.com/DominikAdamski created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96742
Flang-new needs to add `mlink-builtin-bitcode` objects to properly support
offload code generation for AMD GPU.
fcuda-is-device flag is not used by Flang currently. In the future it will be
needed for Fl
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dominik Adamski (DominikAdamski)
Changes
Flang-new needs to add `mlink-builtin-bitcode` objects to properly support
offload code generation for AMD GPU.
fcuda-is-device flag is not used by Flang currently. In the future it will be
needed
@@ -228,10 +228,11 @@ void
AMDGPUAtomicOptimizerImpl::visitAtomicRMWInst(AtomicRMWInst &I) {
// If the value operand is divergent, each lane is contributing a different
// value to the atomic calculation. We can only optimize divergent values if
- // we have DPP availabl
vikramRH wrote:
Apologies for the commit spam here, graphite seems a good option now onwards.
However all dependent patches have landed now, the diff here is now up to date.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/DominikAdamski edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3636,6 +3648,22 @@ def Fmin : FPMathTemplate, LibBuiltin<"math.h"> {
let OnlyBuiltinPrefixedAliasIsConstexpr = 1;
}
+def FmaximumNum : FPMathTemplate, LibBuiltin<"math.h"> {
philnik777 wrote:
In that case this should probably be a `GNULibBuiltin`. Or is
mydeveloperday wrote:
> Isn't fixing bugs meant to change defaults? See #61732, #48746 and #93793.
> The old version is confusing since it looks like a separate template
> parameter when it isn't.
I'm ok, if the second style is what we want if thats what we are expecting then
I'm good with it
mydeveloperday wrote:
> Where is the documentation for the value? CLion reports `clang-format` option
> as an error by the reason. No doc, no schema rule.
Personally, I'm not a fan of CLion enough to care! especially following
JetBrains slating of clang-format: (thanks for doing that at a mas
@@ -402,34 +413,30 @@ Value
*AMDGPUAtomicOptimizerImpl::buildReduction(IRBuilder<> &B,
// Reduce within each pair of rows (i.e. 32 lanes).
assert(ST->hasPermLaneX16());
- V = B.CreateBitCast(V, IntNTy);
jayfoad wrote:
Please submit an NFC cleanup patch
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-26T11:44:55+02:00
New Revision: 90e4eb8a479dbef4f98f7d8ccd2de5494c6366c7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90e4eb8a479dbef4f98f7d8ccd2de5494c6366c7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/90e4eb8a479dbef4f98f7d8ccd2de5494c6366c7.diff
LO
@@ -178,6 +178,20 @@ bool AMDGPUAtomicOptimizerImpl::run(Function &F) {
return Changed;
}
+static bool shouldOptimize(Type *Ty) {
+ switch (Ty->getTypeID()) {
+ case Type::FloatTyID:
+ case Type::DoubleTyID:
+return true;
+ case Type::IntegerTyID: {
+if (Ty->getI
@@ -178,6 +178,20 @@ bool AMDGPUAtomicOptimizerImpl::run(Function &F) {
return Changed;
}
+static bool shouldOptimize(Type *Ty) {
arsenm wrote:
Better name that expresses why this type is handleable.
Also in a follow up, really should cover the i16/half/b
@@ -1130,7 +1130,8 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(
AArch64::AEK_MTE, AArch64::AEK_SSBS,
AArch64::AEK_FP16,AArch64::AEK_FP16FML,
AArch64::AEK_SB, AArch64::AEK_JSCVT,
- AArch64::AEK_FCMA,
https://github.com/h-vetinari updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93429
>From 8c1b899aa174b107fece1edbf99eaf261bdea516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:45:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [runtimes] [CMake] Use CMAKE_REQUIRED_
Michael137 wrote:
While fixing the libc++ formatters in preparation for the [compressed_pair
change](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/93069), i encountered
another issue which I'm not sure entirely how to best reconcile. There's [this
assumption in
`RecordLayoutBuilder`](https://gi
https://github.com/skatrak commented:
Thanks for working on my previous comments. I just have a couple more minor
ones.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93977
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
@@ -5272,36 +5682,53 @@ static void emitTargetCall(OpenMPIRBuilder &OMPBuilder,
IRBuilderBase &Builder,
Value *DynCGGroupMem = Builder.getInt32(0);
bool HasNoWait = false;
+ bool HasDependencies = Dependencies.size() > 0;
+ bool RequiresOuterTargetTask = HasNoWait || Ha
@@ -5229,13 +5382,284 @@ static void emitTargetOutlinedFunction(
OMPBuilder.emitTargetRegionFunction(EntryInfo, GenerateOutlinedFunction,
true,
OutlinedFn, OutlinedFnID);
}
+OpenMPIRBuilder::InsertPointTy OpenMPIRBuilder::emitTargetTask(
https://github.com/skatrak edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93977
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+! Offloading test checking the use of the depend clause on
+! the target construct
+! REQUIRES: flang, amdgcn-amd-amdhsa
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda-LTO
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+! Offloading test checking the use of the depend clause on
+! the target construct
+! REQUIRES: flang, amdgcn-amd-amdhsa
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda-LTO
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-
@@ -705,28 +728,9 @@ convertOmpTaskOp(omp::TaskOp taskOp, llvm::IRBuilderBase
&builder,
};
SmallVector dds;
- if (!taskOp.getDependVars().empty() && taskOp.getDepends()) {
-for (auto dep :
- llvm::zip(taskOp.getDependVars(), taskOp.getDepends()->getValue()))
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+! Offloading test checking the use of the depend clause on
+! the target construct
+! REQUIRES: flang, amdgcn-amd-amdhsa
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda
+! UNSUPPORTED: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda-LTO
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
+! UNSUPPORTED: aarch64-
AaronBallman wrote:
> > I looked at my meeting notes for discussion of this paper and I think we do
> > need to worry about what the C standard says. From my notes: `The big
> > intent from this change seems to be about making INFINITY to be a feature
> > test macro.`, so if users are going to
@@ -207,6 +211,23 @@
#error "Mandatory macros {FLT,DBL,LDBL}_MAX_10_EXP are invalid."
#endif
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 202311L || !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
+#ifndef FLT_NORM_MAX
+ #error "Mandatory macro FLT_NORM_MAX is missing."
+#else
+ _Static_assert(FLT_NORM_MAX >= 1.
@@ -113,7 +113,11 @@ static T PickFP(const llvm::fltSemantics *Sem, T
IEEEHalfVal, T IEEESingleVal,
static void DefineFloatMacros(MacroBuilder &Builder, StringRef Prefix,
const llvm::fltSemantics *Sem, StringRef Ext) {
- const char *DenormMin, *
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96643
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikola-tesic-ns updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96633
>From 41427a3de345517025477257bfd4f614f06cbcfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikola Tesic
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:58:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Access tls_guard via llvm.threadlocal.address
@@ -1059,9 +1059,10 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
if (Guard.isValid()) {
// If we have a guard variable, check whether we've already performed
// these initializations. This happens for TLS initialization functions.
- ll
https://github.com/hokein commented:
Thanks, this looks good overall.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96084
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -108,8 +108,11 @@ struct Foo {
Foo(T const (&)[N]);
};
+// FIXME: Prefer non-canonical template arguments in the deduction guide?
template
using Bar = Foo; // expected-note {{candidate template ignored:
couldn't infer template argument 'X'}} \
+
@@ -108,8 +108,11 @@ struct Foo {
Foo(T const (&)[N]);
};
+// FIXME: Prefer non-canonical template arguments in the deduction guide?
hokein wrote:
We have a open bug for this, https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79798.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
@@ -108,8 +108,11 @@ struct Foo {
Foo(T const (&)[N]);
};
+// FIXME: Prefer non-canonical template arguments in the deduction guide?
template
using Bar = Foo; // expected-note {{candidate template ignored:
couldn't infer template argument 'X'}} \
+
https://github.com/CarolineConcatto closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88710
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-26T13:54:53+02:00
New Revision: 847d046a82a760caa1b05206d77ed0b3d7bd4be6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/847d046a82a760caa1b05206d77ed0b3d7bd4be6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/847d046a82a760caa1b05206d77ed0b3d7bd4be6.diff
LO
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3216,6 +3226,44 @@ void DeclareImplicitDeductionGuidesForTypeAlias(
Guides.suppressDiagnostics();
for (auto *G : Guides) {
+if (auto *DG = dyn_cast(G)) {
+ // The deduction guide is a non-template function decl, we just clone it.
+ auto *FunctionType =
+
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang,llvm` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/720
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/90
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/815
Here i
https://github.com/jhuber6 approved this pull request.
The fact that it's called `-fcuda-is-device` is historical cruft, but I guess
it's easiest to just work with it. I also hate `-mlink-builtin-bitcode` as a
concept, but we're not quite ready to move away from its hacks unfortunately.
https
@@ -336,9 +336,12 @@ def warn_anyx86_excessive_regsave : Warning<
" with attribute 'no_caller_saved_registers'"
" or be compiled with '-mgeneral-regs-only'">,
InGroup>;
-def warn_arm_interrupt_calling_convention : Warning<
- "call to function without interrupt attribute
@@ -448,6 +448,11 @@ Modified Compiler Flags
evaluating to ``true`` and an empty body such as ``while(1);``)
are considered infinite, even when the ``-ffinite-loop`` flag is set.
+- Removed "arm interrupt calling convention" warning that was included in
+ ``-Wextra`` with
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/624
Here is the relevant piece
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96643
>From 408c34b84966a256bb6e7fdf45758f5c77380bbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:27:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [C23] Add *_NORM_MAX macros to
This adds the *_NORM_MA
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ void Flang::AddAMDGPUTargetArgs(const ArgList &Args,
StringRef Val = A->getValue();
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString("-mcode-object-version=" + Val));
}
+
+ const ToolChain &TC = getToolChain();
+ TC.addClangTargetOptions(Args, CmdArgs, Actio
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95901
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96758
This is a refactoring change for better code isolation and reuse, the first
step to extend it for assignments.
>From 3c5318893322d1f904a52b2f92d5ccd191aa5930 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Fri,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
This is a refactoring change for better code isolation and reuse, the first
step to extend it for assignments.
---
Patch is 102.58 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -449,6 +449,23 @@ OMPUnrollDirective *OMPUnrollDirective::CreateEmpty(const
ASTContext &C,
SourceLocation(), SourceLocation());
}
+OMPReverseDirective *
+OMPReverseDirective::Create(const ASTContext &C, SourceLocation StartLoc,
+SourceLoca
@@ -15749,6 +15757,186 @@ StmtResult
SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPUnrollDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
buildPreInits(Context, PreInits));
}
+StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPReverseDirective(Stmt *AStmt,
+
@@ -15749,6 +15757,186 @@ StmtResult
SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPUnrollDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
buildPreInits(Context, PreInits));
}
+StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPReverseDirective(Stmt *AStmt,
+
@@ -15749,6 +15757,186 @@ StmtResult
SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPUnrollDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
buildPreInits(Context, PreInits));
}
+StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPReverseDirective(Stmt *AStmt,
+
@@ -15749,6 +15757,186 @@ StmtResult
SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPUnrollDirective(ArrayRef Clauses,
buildPreInits(Context, PreInits));
}
+StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPReverseDirective(Stmt *AStmt,
+
Author: Caroline Concatto
Date: 2024-06-26T12:53:34Z
New Revision: 177cbd16663a2ca36d0d7145c3b62f2d756f8f7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/177cbd16663a2ca36d0d7145c3b62f2d756f8f7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/177cbd16663a2ca36d0d7145c3b62f2d756f8f7f.diff
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-06-26T15:01:57+02:00
New Revision: dfe80a73223edff5c53f8be7925d302883cb40bc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dfe80a73223edff5c53f8be7925d302883cb40bc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dfe80a73223edff5c53f8be7925d302883cb40bc.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-06-26T15:03:37+02:00
New Revision: 85f47fdd039549ed7e89b53ca34b0b35456ffe3d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85f47fdd039549ed7e89b53ca34b0b35456ffe3d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/85f47fdd039549ed7e89b53ca34b0b35456ffe3d.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
CarolineConcatto wrote:
I believe it is fixed with this patch:
commit 177cbd16663a2ca36d0d7145c3b62f2d756f8f7f (HEAD -> main, origin/main,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Caroline Concatto
Date: Wed Jun 26 12:35:21 2024 +
[Clang][SME2.1] Add REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target to test
PR#
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: 2024-06-26T08:11:09-05:00
New Revision: e24a21291ac35a0660ec7cf19d4c36019ee7437e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e24a21291ac35a0660ec7cf19d4c36019ee7437e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e24a21291ac35a0660ec7cf19d4c36019ee7437e
https://github.com/kparzysz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94691
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm approved this pull request.
LGTM. Shame the order of the `-target-features` has to change again, but I can
see why (there are non-user-visible extensions in the ExtensionInfo table now,
which also need sorted).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95805
__
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/913
He
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96758
>From 6b18b58f4b3c4032c21252177709ab7759060c1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:48:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][sema] Move the initializer lifetime checking code
from SemaI
https://github.com/pratlucas closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95805
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/budimirarandjelovicsyrmia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307
From 9e4309a805f31096d72cb21cd266175cac5b07c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: budimirarandjelovicsyrmia
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:39:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Emit bad shift warnings
---
@@ -652,6 +652,141 @@ in the future. The expected roadmap for Reduced BMIs as
of Clang 19.x is:
comes, the term BMI will refer to the Reduced BMI and the Full BMI will only
be meaningful to build systems which elect to support two-phase compilation.
+Experimental No Tra
https://github.com/legrosbuffle updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95901
>From 8f6ff99ddb035d63e99910f873a8d9938bd0b3e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clement Courbet
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:33:34 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][transformer] Introduce a `constructExprArgs` range
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96766
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96731
It causes CI failures.
>From d1ed32e5cb1cb43acf2d9085960ff37c3fe6b09b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: martinboehme
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:40:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] =?UT
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-06-26T15:40:42+02:00
New Revision: 6e96e5ab8a0e40fba0302a5c32574be41ef57354
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e96e5ab8a0e40fba0302a5c32574be41ef57354
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e96e5ab8a0e40fba0302a5c32574be41ef57354.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96766
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96731
It causes CI failures.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96766.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/ASTOps.h (
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-06-26T15:40:54+02:00
New Revision: e5e0d8739d4a2b70d7ad317863d7b168e4895b18
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5e0d8739d4a2b70d7ad317863d7b168e4895b18
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5e0d8739d4a2b70d7ad317863d7b168e4895b18.diff
LO
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang,flang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-indexer-check-clangd".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang,flang,llvm` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/823
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ve-ninja` running on
`hpce-ve-main` while building `clang,flang,llvm` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/729
Here is the relevant piece of the build l
@@ -1059,9 +1059,15 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
if (Guard.isValid()) {
// If we have a guard variable, check whether we've already performed
// these initializations. This happens for TLS initialization functions.
- ll
@@ -1070,13 +1076,26 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
// Mark as initialized before initializing anything else. If the
// initializers use previously-initialized thread_local vars, that's
// probably supposed to be OK, but the
@@ -1059,9 +1059,15 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
if (Guard.isValid()) {
// If we have a guard variable, check whether we've already performed
// these initializations. This happens for TLS initialization functions.
- ll
@@ -1070,13 +1076,26 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
// Mark as initialized before initializing anything else. If the
// initializers use previously-initialized thread_local vars, that's
// probably supposed to be OK, but the
@@ -1059,9 +1059,15 @@
CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalInitFunc(llvm::Function *Fn,
if (Guard.isValid()) {
// If we have a guard variable, check whether we've already performed
// these initializations. This happens for TLS initialization functions.
- ll
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `clang,flang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/630
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`clang,flang,llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/621
Here is the rel
1 - 100 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
