https://github.com/hekota ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl
Author: Helena Kotas (hekota)
Changes
Implements HLSL availability diagnostics' strict mode.
HLSL availability diagnostics emits errors or warning when unavailable shader
APIs are used. Unavailable shader APIs are APIs that are exposed in HLSL cod
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Helena Kotas (hekota)
Changes
Implements HLSL availability diagnostics' strict mode.
HLSL availability diagnostics emits errors or warning when unavailable shader
APIs are used. Unavailable shader APIs are APIs that are exposed in HLSL co
@@ -1060,11 +1060,6 @@ static llvm::StringRef
canonicalizePlatformName(llvm::StringRef Platform) {
.Case("ShaderModel", "shadermodel")
.Default(Platform);
}
-static llvm::StringRef getPrettyEnviromentName(llvm::Triple::EnvironmentType
EnvironmentType
https://github.com/fanbo-meng updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91384
>From 84e5ca4d8987d071d20b9dcba673b0c856762487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fanbo Meng
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 13:36:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [SystemZ][z/OS] Implement z/OS XPLINK ABI
The XPLINK callin
@@ -24,6 +44,103 @@ using enum E;
#endif
}
+namespace cwg2627 { // cwg2627: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+struct C {
+ long long i : 8;
+ friend auto operator<=>(C, C) = default;
+};
+
+void f() {
+ C x{1}, y{2};
+ static_cast(x <=> y);
+ static_cast(x.i <=> y.i);
+}
+
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78112
>From 92f8720e3d21521b589d5291f086a2f32b87bfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:52:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [clang] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2627 Bit-fields and
narrowin
@@ -1170,6 +1170,23 @@ The AMDGPU backend implements the following LLVM IR
intrinsics.
:ref:`llvm.set.fpenv` Sets the floating point
environment to the specifies state.
+ llvm.amdgcn.readfirstlaneProvides direct access to
v_readfirstl
https://github.com/cor3ntin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93867
Fix regression introduced by #93216
>From 03737382aaacacc1aecb0c416bc2036b634bdd72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 21:32:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] \ is not valid in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
Fix regression introduced by #93216
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93867.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/CharInfo.h (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/test/Lexe
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: 2024-05-30T14:49:13-05:00
New Revision: ce7b67091267ffcc67194b0f116a63249a77230f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce7b67091267ffcc67194b0f116a63249a77230f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce7b67091267ffcc67194b0f116a63249a77230f
https://github.com/kparzysz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93611
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
>From 616b2cf138f9b4a1f3a23db404f77c0603ad61e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:15:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [WIP][Clang] Implement resolution for CWG1835
---
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
struct D : B {};
} // namespace cwg2718
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+ int i;
+ int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+static_assert(static_cast(x + 0) < static_cast(x + 1), "");
+stat
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
struct D : B {};
} // namespace cwg2718
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+ int i;
+ int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
Endilll wrote:
If you need to match diagnostics
@@ -1,11 +1,23 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++98 -verify=expected %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++98 -Wgnu-folding-constant
-verify=expected %s
Endilll wrote:
I hope `-Wgnu-folding-constant` is not going to be nee
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
struct D : B {};
} // namespace cwg2718
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+ int i;
+ int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+static_assert(static_cast(x + 0) < static_cast(x + 1), "");
+stat
https://github.com/yxsamliu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77359
>From 319552f781eb6186f96f72b8de23de1390c5da0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Yaxun (Sam) Liu"
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:02:37 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA][HIP] warn incompatible redeclare
nvcc warns about th
@@ -92,3 +92,43 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
@@ -92,3 +92,43 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
@@ -92,3 +92,43 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
Author: Artem Yurchenko
Date: 2024-05-30T13:18:47-07:00
New Revision: 7b8048939024841e07f8d89ddfaa4311f9dd7e9c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b8048939024841e07f8d89ddfaa4311f9dd7e9c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b8048939024841e07f8d89ddfaa4311f9dd7e9c.dif
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93131
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@temyurchenko Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged
into the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a b
https://github.com/yonghong-song approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yonghong-song wrote:
> Is there some test coverage that shows that unreferenced variables/functions
> aren't included in the output?
@mejedi Please add a test case for this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Sorry for not responding sooner, but I think this approach makes sense to me.
It's basically similar to autoconf where we're checking whether a feature is
supported and guarding against it.
One concern I have is that someone adding new code may think
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bader edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
; RUN: llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv64-unknown-unknown %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv64-amd-amdhsa %s -o - | FileCheck %s
bader wrote:
I'm not sure if there is a value in testing `spirv64-amd-amdhsa` triple in
addition to `spirv6
https://github.com/bader commented:
I'm okay with the patch in general, but I'd like either @michalpaszkowski or
@VyacheslavLevytskyy to take a look.
Just one question about doubling the test scope for LLVM tests with spir64
target triple.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89796
__
@@ -1950,8 +1950,22 @@ ConstantLValueEmitter::tryEmitBase(const
APValue::LValueBase &base) {
if (D->hasAttr())
return CGM.GetWeakRefReference(D).getPointer();
-if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D))
- return CGM.GetAddrOfFunction(FD);
+if (auto FD = dyn_cast(D)) {
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
According to [[temp.expl.spec] p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.expl.spec#2):
> The declaration in an _explicit-specialization_ shall not be an
> _export-declaration_. An explicit specialization shall not use a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
According to [[temp.expl.spec] p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.expl.spec#2):
> The declaration in an _explicit-specialization_ shall not be an
_export-declaration_. An explicit specialization shall
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
According to [[temp.expl.spec] p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.expl.spec#2):
> The declaration in an _explicit-specialization_ shall not be an
_export-declaration_. An explicit specializatio
topperc wrote:
Looks like you need to update the RISCVISAInfoTest.cpp to move the extension
form the experimental list to the non-experimental list
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/kzhuravl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
None
>From be005a9baf0e7f0ae7b28b96ef7e562158800af4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Zhuravlyov
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:27:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add gfx12-generic target
---
clang/test/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-objectyaml
Author: Konstantin Zhuravlyov (kzhuravl)
Changes
---
Patch is 24.16 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875.diff
21 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/kzhuravl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
>From be005a9baf0e7f0ae7b28b96ef7e562158800af4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Zhuravlyov
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:27:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] AMDGPU: Add gfx12-generic target
---
clang/test/Dr
whitequark wrote:
> One concern I have is that someone adding new code may think they need to
> come up with fallback behavior in case a feature isn't available
Shall I add some comments to config.h indicating as such?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92677
___
Author: David Blaikie
Date: 2024-05-30T20:36:47Z
New Revision: 6e975ecf5c93c40d2f088425548eb6476332629c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e975ecf5c93c40d2f088425548eb6476332629c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e975ecf5c93c40d2f088425548eb6476332629c.diff
LOG:
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
struct D : B {};
} // namespace cwg2718
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+ int i;
+ int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+static_assert(static_cast(x + 0) < static_cast(x + 1), "");
+stat
@@ -1,11 +1,32 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
-verify=expected
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
-verify=expected,since-cxx11,cxx11
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
-verify=expec
@@ -799,11 +799,12 @@ enum : unsigned {
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_RESERVED_0X56 = 0x056,
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_RESERVED_0X57 = 0x057,
EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_RESERVED_0X58 = 0x058,
+ EF_AMDGPU_MACH_AMDGCN_GFX12_GENERIC = 0x059,
shiltian wrote:
```suggesti
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
Comments in the config file isn't a harmful thing, but I'm also worried about
folks who never see the config file. e.g., they're working in Path.inc on
something, see `HAVE_PWD_H` in the code, and just make assumptions from there.
So perhaps a two-pronged approach: a commen
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
Sensible to me! Definitely needs a release note. Perhaps an alert on
discourse about 'potentially breaking' changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
___
cfe-commits mailing li
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
struct D : B {};
} // namespace cwg2718
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+ int i;
+ int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+static_assert(static_cast(x + 0) < static_cast(x + 1), "");
+stat
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93046
>From e1172958f43af7490b5b6e3752a9070265ad17ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:01:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] CWG2749: relational operators involving pointers
to
@@ -2928,12 +2928,13 @@ static void emitUsed(CodeGenModule &CGM, StringRef Name,
for (unsigned i = 0, e = List.size(); i != e; ++i) {
UsedArray[i] =
llvm::ConstantExpr::getPointerBitCastOrAddrSpaceCast(
-cast(&*List[i]), CGM.Int8PtrTy);
---
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80801
>From 2c8c5129a9df16c87d9a89ce3864b857c438978e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:26:07 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [clang] require template arg list after template kw
Require a t
nikic wrote:
These Sema refactorings have been increasing the time to build clang by a small
increment with every patch -- this one is an extra large jump of 0.7%
(https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=59e2a6b08f3e40afea87da3838ba69e1e15b6672&to=8aa80199751b0cd6631d057b0bfb2158
https://github.com/Eclips4 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93878
None
>From 6bd0f8aa806c5603e849f7973cf9464ff7b41ccc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kirill Podoprigora
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 23:52:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Replace the link to the old bug tracker with a new one
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kirill Podoprigora (Eclips4)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93878.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/README.txt (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/README.txt b/clang/README.txt
index 63
@@ -3541,6 +3541,7 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier
AS, Declarator &D,
IdentifierInfo *II = Name.getAsIdentifierInfo();
+#if 0
mizvekov wrote:
Leftover
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
_
@@ -3561,6 +3562,7 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier
AS, Declarator &D,
}
return nullptr;
}
+#endif
mizvekov wrote:
Leftover
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
___
https://github.com/SamuelMarks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93503
>From bcdc355e9585e35f128a1b3ec71655d47bbf6986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Marks <807580+samuelma...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 00:49:37 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang/www/ge
@@ -67,15 +67,13 @@ On Unix-like Systems
Build LLVM and Clang:
cd llvm-project
-mkdir build (in-tree build is not supported)
-cd build
This builds both LLVM and Clang in release mode. Alternatively, if
you need a debug build, switch Release to Deb
https://github.com/kzhuravl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
>From be005a9baf0e7f0ae7b28b96ef7e562158800af4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Zhuravlyov
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:27:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] AMDGPU: Add gfx12-generic target
---
clang/test/Dr
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= ,
Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
vgvassilev wrote:
We generally have to put a switch for the late parsed templates. We have it in
some other tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89734
___
https://github.com/farzonl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93879
- `Attr.td` - Define the HLSL loop attribute hints (unroll and loop)
- `AttrDocs.td` - Add documentation for unroll and loop
- `CGLoopInfo.cpp` - Add codegen for HLSL unroll that maps to clang unroll
expectations
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
- `Attr.td` - Define the HLSL loop attribute hints (unroll and loop)
- `AttrDocs.td` - Add documentation for unroll and loop
- `CGLoopInfo.cpp` - Add codegen for HLSL unroll that maps to clang unroll
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93879
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -92,3 +92,43 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
whitequark wrote:
> Comments in the config file isn't a harmful thing, but I'm also worried about
> folks who never see the config file. e.g., they're working in Path.inc on
> something, see `HAVE_PWD_H` in the code, and just make assumptions from there.
>
> So perhaps a two-pronged approach:
efriedma-quic wrote:
Please add a table to LangRef comparing the behavior of the three versions of
min/max intrinsics for various inputs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93841
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
ahatanak wrote:
I can see if we can make `hasInit` check that too or rename the function after
committing this patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
>From e638448bce1dd529acbf81592f324bdc1ecb3e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:42:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Diagnose variable template explicit
s
asudarsa wrote:
> I'm okay with the patch in general, but I'd like either @michalpaszkowski or
> @VyacheslavLevytskyy to take a look. Just one question about doubling the
> test scope for LLVM tests with spir64 target triple.
+1 on this. I will take a look before end of week on this. Thanks
h
https://github.com/mizvekov commented:
Interestingly, only GCC errors on a case like this:
```
namespace {
template int A = 0;
}
template<> int A = 0;
```
https://godbolt.org/z/TTjssKxz5
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
___
cfe-commi
@@ -92,3 +92,43 @@ extern __attribute__((address_space(0))) int
type_attr_test_2; // expec
void invalid_param_fn(__attribute__((address_space(1))) int i); //
expected-error {{parameter may not be qualified with an address space}}
typeof(invalid_param_fn) invalid_param
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92767
>From f87cb4c754a477515746e2ac2f8906b93ccd1fe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:58:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] [C23] Fix typeof_unqual for qualified array types
P
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ On Unix-like Systems
https://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#frequently-used-cmake-variables";>frequently
used cmake variables
for more options.
-cmake -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -G
"Unix Makefiles" ../llvm
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
DR test changes look good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sdkrystian wrote:
@mizvekov GCC seems to be right; [[decl.meaning.general]
p3.3](eel.is/c++draft/dcl.meaning.general#3.3) requires that the specialized
declaration be nominable (per [[basic.scope.scope]
p7](eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope.scope#7)) in `S` (which in this case is the
global namespa
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ On Unix-like Systems
https://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#frequently-used-cmake-variables";>frequently
used cmake variables
for more options.
-cmake -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -G
"Unix Makefiles" ../llvm
Endilll wrote:
Thank you for letting me know! Given the amount of positive feedback I've heard
about this effort, I think we'll continue, trying to claw back the compile
times elsewhere (my recent patch that removed try_compile checks from CMake
should've helped, even if it's not counted in yo
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78112
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78112
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5461,8 +5461,7 @@ bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper
&Helper,
SmallVector PartialRes;
unsigned NumParts = Size / 32;
- MachineInstrBuilder Src0Parts, Src2Parts;
- Src0Parts = B.buildUnmerge(PartialResTy, Src0);
+ MachineInstrBuilder Src0Parts
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873
>From e638448bce1dd529acbf81592f324bdc1ecb3e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:42:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] Diagnose variable template explicit
s
@@ -1062,6 +1063,159 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(const Expr
*E, unsigned Type,
return Builder.CreateSelect(Cmp, Res, ConstantInt::get(ResType, 0,
IsSigned));
}
+namespace {
+
+class ObjectSizeVisitor
+: public ConstStmtVisitor {
+ bool SkipASE;
+
+
@@ -1062,6 +1063,160 @@ CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(const Expr
*E, unsigned Type,
return Builder.CreateSelect(Cmp, Res, ConstantInt::get(ResType, 0,
IsSigned));
}
+namespace {
+
+class ObjectSizeVisitor
+: public ConstStmtVisitor {
+ ASTContext &Ctx;
MaskRay wrote:
> We started seeing a build time regression in our Clang toolchain builders on
> Mac, and I bisected to this commit:
>
> 1. Build step took 1.7 hours in the last build before (clang -> build)
>
> [luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/prod/clang-mac-x64/b874743907285139
Author: Jorge Gorbe Moya
Date: 2024-05-30T15:42:57-07:00
New Revision: d4ff9615a1531f4a466b7d1fb0f175e3ae489289
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4ff9615a1531f4a466b7d1fb0f175e3ae489289
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4ff9615a1531f4a466b7d1fb0f175e3ae489289.di
=?utf-8?q?Eänolituri_Lómitaurë?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/earnol updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93612
>From 1d58ee62ddf4ebf4f8f21b47e7240d3df9ef4ea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?E=C3=A4nolituri=20L=C3=B3mitaur=C3=AB?=
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 11:
MaskRay wrote:
Consider copying the original description to ensure that the linked issues will
be properly closed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93889
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93889
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gulfemsavrun wrote:
> @gulfemsavrun Commit
> [245491a](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/245491a9f384e4c53421196533c2a2b693efaf8d)
> (`[MC] Disable MCAssembler based constant folding for DwarfDebug`;
> independent of this patch) should have fixed the compile time regression.
> Might
=?utf-8?q?Eänolituri_Lómitaurë?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/earnol updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93612
>From 1d58ee62ddf4ebf4f8f21b47e7240d3df9ef4ea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?E=C3=A4nolituri=20L=C3=B3mitaur=C3=AB?=
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 11:
https://github.com/nishithshah2211 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93753
>From ae79ebec844a6a308bb370184eab892bd74e8fa1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nishith Shah
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:34:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Pass LangOpts from CompilerInstance to
DependencyScanning
gulfemsavrun wrote:
We started seeing an lldb test failure, and I bisected to this commit:
```
--
Command Output (stderr):
--
FAIL: LLDB (/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/bin/clang-x86_64) :: test_completions
(TestDAP_completions.TestDAP_completions.test_completions)
FAIL: LLDB (/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build
https://github.com/aaronmondal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93889
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaronmondal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93889
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
301 - 400 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
