eaeltsin wrote:
:( My goal now is to fix xtensor implementation/original tests, so this is not
a question of reduction. I need to understand where the compiler picked a
different specialization with relaxed argument matching.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
__
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93530
>From ebe47b2b411d7623ddafadad45a9be25913fe1c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:48:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] [Modules] Don't generate the defintition for
non-const a
@@ -5341,6 +5341,15 @@ void CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalVarDefinition(const
VarDecl *D,
!IsDefinitionAvailableExternally &&
D->needsDestruction(getContext()) == QualType::DK_cxx_destructor;
+ // It is helpless to emit the definition for an available_externally varia
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93530
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -947,6 +947,26 @@ void TextNodeDumper::dumpDeclRef(const Decl *D, StringRef
Label) {
});
}
+void TextNodeDumper::dumpTemplateArgument(const TemplateArgument &TA) {
+ llvm::SmallString<128> Str;
+ {
+llvm::raw_svector_ostream SS(Str);
+TA.print(PrintPolicy, SS,
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-05-29T13:39:57+08:00
New Revision: b0f10a1dc34aa1b73faeeabdc2d348074a02c75d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b0f10a1dc34aa1b73faeeabdc2d348074a02c75d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b0f10a1dc34aa1b73faeeabdc2d348074a02c75d.diff
LO
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93530
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
> :( My goal now is to fix xtensor implementation/original tests, so this is
> not a question of reduction. I need to understand where the compiler picked a
> different specialization with relaxed argument matching.
So from the reduction you can see you have a problem where `sv
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
LGTM. This avoids a temporary std::string, which might need a memory allocation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90728
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
Author: MagentaTreehouse
Date: 2024-05-28T23:12:26-07:00
New Revision: 476a6d81a3648cf638400632c098e9f0ed025f8f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/476a6d81a3648cf638400632c098e9f0ed025f8f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/476a6d81a3648cf638400632c098e9f0ed025f8f.di
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90728
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Discookie updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91951
>From 69cbd3da19eb0f8eb6758782b46daf99b5b79ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viktor
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 06:11:58 +
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Add `bugprone-virtual-arithmetic` check
Finds pointer arithmetic
ritter-x2a wrote:
> If we are adding a special case for handling overloads, perhaps a better
> approach would be to consider inferring the caller context from the
> enveloping function declaration attributes, and allow overload resolution to
> pick a device function instead. It would avoid the
401 - 413 of 413 matches
Mail list logo