@@ -5386,6 +5386,130 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
cor3ntin wrote:
CI failures look unrelated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniel M. Katz
Date: 2024-05-09T09:22:11+02:00
New Revision: 443377a9d1a8d4a69a317a1a892184c59dd0aec6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/443377a9d1a8d4a69a317a1a892184c59dd0aec6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/443377a9d1a8d4a69a317a1a892184c59dd0aec6.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91435
>From 32e3c974d5f3f5651c5805210a7215af4d6df24b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 09:31:32 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add examples from [dcl.init.aggr] to C++ conformance
https://github.com/Stylie777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90614
>From db0ca41c85b69f02f6e3b522ff3a2948e6a729fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Styles
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:17:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC] Add Extension Lookup to AArch64TargetParser
Currently,
MaskRay wrote:
> > I want to hear about opinions why the old compiler-rt file hierarchy is
> > preferred by some users.
>
> I think if you really want a range of opinions, you can get them from an RFC.
> Not many people will be watching this PR.
Perhaps @tru can make another comment to
https
https://github.com/petrhosek created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91567
This is a follow up to #91028.
>From ca2b9d52d31866a657e2eb19585cdcd11bcad7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hosek
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 00:28:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Pass -fseparate-named-secti
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
This is a follow up to #91028.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91567.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp (+2)
``diff
diff --
@@ -1190,6 +1191,36 @@ void CodeGenModule::Release() {
if (!LangOpts.isSignReturnAddressWithAKey())
getModule().addModuleFlag(llvm::Module::Min,
"sign-return-address-with-bkey", 1);
+
+if (getTriple().isOSLinux() && getTriple().isOS
vvd170501 wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 commented:
I think I'm fine with it as-is, but we probably need include-cleaner folks to
approve it. (That means you probably have to wait a few more weeks for them,
unfortunately.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87208
_
SimplyDanny wrote:
> If nothing is provided, then nothing can be detected.
And why is this not a valid test? No `CHECK-*` comments in the reference file,
so no violations from `clang-tidy` are expected?
> `not` will treat non-zero return code as success. It is totally different
> thing.
👍
vvd170501 wrote:
@EugeneZelenko, can you approve this, please? Or are 2 approves enough to merge?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
Author: Vadim D
Date: 2024-05-09T10:25:26+02:00
New Revision: febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
>From 919af72c09216838bfe586c3da503f5d74104a7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:57:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [PAC][clang] Define ptrauth driver flags and
preprocesso
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-linux -S -emit-llvm -o - \
kovdan01 wrote:
Fixed, thanks, see 37a4d9d08fefd8c42c21b92ad2e3c1fa07fac126
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
cfe-commit
Long5hot wrote:
ping!! @nemanjai
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
Code change LGTM.
Although currently trivial, would it be worth adding a Driver test for it.
Something like
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/Driver/funique-internal-linkage-names.c
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/915
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
>From 55aecbedf3e10207eaef1d4c7913086a32e16b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:55:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] support expect no diagnosis test
---
.../tes
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I remove the command line option. Instead, when input don't have any check,
check-clang-tidy will assume it should not diagnose anything.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
>From 55aecbedf3e10207eaef1d4c7913086a32e16b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:55:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] support expect no diagnosis test
---
.../tes
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90602
>From dfb8a9de874f233c9d3964569f3d5201fd717c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:46:48 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][AArch64] Fixed incorrect _BitInt alignment
---
clang
Author: Lukacma
Date: 2024-05-09T10:45:19+01:00
New Revision: 105dd60fc86a20404bd97ea7132e2c746ade300a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/105dd60fc86a20404bd97ea7132e2c746ade300a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/105dd60fc86a20404bd97ea7132e2c746ade300a.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/Lukacma closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90741
>From dfb8a9de874f233c9d3964569f3d5201fd717c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:46:48 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][AArch64] Fixed incorrect _BitInt alignment
---
clang
smithp35 wrote:
I think it would be useful to nominate a source as the canonical reference for
the specification which is updated along with any implementation changes. I
think
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-crel-a-compact-relocation-format-for-elf/77600/3
is a good starting point.
Possibl
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91577
This XFAIL test is written in 4 years ago and still todo.
4 is already in DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues so I do not think this XFAIL case
can be passed.
>From dbe6590cc841305da753100586054d5c3cccbe6c Mon Sep
HerrCai0907 wrote:
> And why is this not a valid test? No `CHECK-*` comments in the reference
> file, so no violations from `clang-tidy` are expected?
Because the FileCheck don't support empty input.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
__
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Congcong Cai (HerrCai0907)
Changes
This XFAIL test is written in 4 years ago and still todo.
4 is already in DefaultIgnoredIntegerValues so I do not think this XFAIL case
can be passed.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
>From 55aecbedf3e10207eaef1d4c7913086a32e16b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:55:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] support expect no diagnosis test
---
.../tes
https://github.com/yus3710-fj created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91579
This patch adds nsw flag to the increment of do-variables when a new option is
enabled.
NOTE 11.10 in the Fortran 2018 standard says they never overflow.
See also the discussion in #74709 and the following di
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yusuke MINATO (yus3710-fj)
Changes
This patch adds nsw flag to the increment of do-variables when a new option is
enabled.
NOTE 11.10 in the Fortran 2018 standard says they never overflow.
See also the discussion in #74709 and the followi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Yusuke MINATO (yus3710-fj)
Changes
This patch adds nsw flag to the increment of do-variables when a new option is
enabled.
NOTE 11.10 in the Fortran 2018 standard says they never overflow.
See also the discussion in #74709 and the
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 235cea720c0fa6dcf0bf5aff15001de88b6042f9
74a0053509564a10faf335c32211cf3dddef4e98 --
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90741
>From 1d6b0bb8479edce69e054ce461482bdbafb4eb4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 15:20:05 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Fix incorrect passing of _BitInt args
---
clang/lib/CodeG
momchil-velikov wrote:
Typo in commit message: `bflaot16`
> Variations other than bfloat16 had been already supported.
-> Variations other than bfloat16 are already supported.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90105
___
cfe-commits mailing li
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90987
>From 4b8b776348438847c2eb238dac973e93fe93294e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Matheson
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:57:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [AArch64] move extension information into tablgen
Gen
https://github.com/SimplyDanny edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SimplyDanny approved this pull request.
I like this much more than an explicit option. However, consider my feedback as
suggestions only as I don't have that much of experience with the project. I
might miss or misinterpret something.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ def run_clang_tidy(self):
print("--")
return clang_tidy_output
+def check_no_diagnosis(self, clang_tidy_output):
+print(clang_tidy_output)
+if clang_tidy_o
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
https://github.com/jayfoad commented:
LGTM overall.
> add f32 pattern to select read/writelane operations
Why would you need this? Don't you legalize f32 to i32?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
@@ -5386,6 +5386,130 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
https://github.com/jayfoad edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -137,17 +137,16 @@ namespace InhCtor {
int n = b.T(); // expected-error {{'T' is a protected member of
'InhCtor::A'}}
// expected-note@-15 {{declared protected here}}
- // FIXME: EDG and GCC reject this too, but it's not clear why it would be
- // ill-
sdkrystian wrote:
@glandium I've reduced it to the following:
```cpp
template
struct A
{
static constexpr bool B = true;
};
template
struct C { };
template
struct D
{
C::B> f();
};
template
auto D::f() -> C::B> { }
```
The problem is that we build a `DependentScopeDeclRefExpr` for `A::
vikramRH wrote:
> > add f32 pattern to select read/writelane operations
>
> Why would you need this? Don't you legalize f32 to i32?
Sorry about this. Its a leftover comment from the initial implementation which
I should have removed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
https://github.com/vikramRH edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -493,8 +493,8 @@ Value *AMDGPUAtomicOptimizerImpl::buildScan(IRBuilder<> &B,
if (!ST->isWave32()) {
// Combine lane 31 into lanes 32..63.
V = B.CreateBitCast(V, IntNTy);
- Value *const Lane31 = B.CreateIntrinsic(Intrinsic::amdgcn_readlane, {},
-
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90612
>From a68d74949438f486f8443c1a4cb5727d769dde31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:58:44 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [AArch64] Fix feature flags dependecies
---
clang/test/Drive
@@ -2930,17 +2939,59 @@ MachineBasicBlock
*AArch64TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(
TII->get(MI.getOpcode()).TSFlags & AArch64::SMEMatrixTypeMask;
switch (SMEMatrixType) {
case (AArch64::SMEMatrixArray):
- return EmitZAInstr(SMEOrigInstr, AArch6
@@ -2883,19 +2883,28 @@ MachineBasicBlock
*AArch64TargetLowering::EmitZTInstr(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineBasicBlock *
AArch64TargetLowering::EmitZAInstr(unsigned Opc, unsigned BaseReg,
- MachineInstr &MI,
- Mac
@@ -2883,19 +2883,28 @@ MachineBasicBlock
*AArch64TargetLowering::EmitZTInstr(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineBasicBlock *
AArch64TargetLowering::EmitZAInstr(unsigned Opc, unsigned BaseReg,
- MachineInstr &MI,
- Mac
https://github.com/momchil-velikov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88710
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/momchil-velikov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88710
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-05-09T06:35:54-05:00
New Revision: 80f9e814ec896fdc57ee84afad8ac4cb1f8e4627
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80f9e814ec896fdc57ee84afad8ac4cb1f8e4627
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80f9e814ec896fdc57ee84afad8ac4cb1f8e4627.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87009
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90612
>From a68d74949438f486f8443c1a4cb5727d769dde31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:58:44 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [AArch64] Fix feature flags dependecies
---
clang/test/Drive
@@ -291,18 +290,17 @@ inline constexpr ExtensionInfo Extensions[] = {
{"tme", AArch64::AEK_TME, "+tme", "-tme", FEAT_INIT, "", 0},
{"wfxt", AArch64::AEK_NONE, {}, {}, FEAT_WFXT, "+wfxt", 550},
{"gcs", AArch64::AEK_GCS, "+gcs", "-gcs", FEAT_INIT, "", 0},
-{"fpmr"
eaeltsin wrote:
> > Thanks, guarding the second specialization with the feature test macro
> > works.
> > I will try to reduce the test case tomorrow, if you still need this.
>
> Thanks. If it's not too much work for you, that would be great. Otherwise, I
> think a pretty good guess can be mad
https://github.com/yus3710-fj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91579
>From f51cfbe1e50c7a1aa902c684f12a20d0fac39c21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yusuke MINATO
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:42:21 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang] Add nsw flag to do-variable increment with a new
opti
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-05-09T07:05:23-05:00
New Revision: e5e66073c3d404f4dedf1b0be160b7815ccf8903
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5e66073c3d404f4dedf1b0be160b7815ccf8903
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5e66073c3d404f4dedf1b0be160b7815ccf8903.diff
bgra8 wrote:
> > Here's a preprocessed file:
> > [repro.zip](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/files/15250584/repro.zip)
> > I tried to reduce, and got rid of most of the test code and some of the
> > stdexec code, but there's still a lot left. I hit the end of my timebox on
> > that. Maybe
AaronBallman wrote:
Is this still in Draft status or should this be marked as ready for review?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88367
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
https://github.com/kovdan01 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniil Kovalev
Date: 2024-05-09T15:32:18+03:00
New Revision: ad652efa1f65e16f5380acfba1bb132145984805
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ad652efa1f65e16f5380acfba1bb132145984805
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ad652efa1f65e16f5380acfba1bb132145984805.diff
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91577
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -149,6 +149,63 @@ class TextTokenRetokenizer {
addToken();
}
+ /// Check if this line starts with @par or \par
+ bool startsWithParCommand() {
+unsigned Offset = 1;
+
+/// Skip all whitespace characters at the beginning.
+/// This needs to backtrack beca
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -2176,26 +2176,23 @@ def int_amdgcn_wave_reduce_umin : AMDGPUWaveReduce;
def int_amdgcn_wave_reduce_umax : AMDGPUWaveReduce;
def int_amdgcn_readfirstlane :
- ClangBuiltin<"__builtin_amdgcn_readfirstlane">,
- Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty],
+ Intrinsic<[llvm_any_t
https://github.com/john-brawn-arm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85665
>From 665d4034a1428d9b5cf1c4d4e89a16fa00b94fb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Brawn
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:17:03 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [DebugInfo] Use DW_op_bit_piece for structured bindings
@@ -6178,10 +6178,16 @@ The current supported opcode vocabulary is limited:
the last entry from the second last entry and appends the result to the
expression stack.
- ``DW_OP_plus_uconst, 93`` adds ``93`` to the working expression.
-- ``DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 16, 8`` specifi
https://github.com/JoverZhang created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91588
Fixes #91561.
>From 19bf94ca3c093a6904482eab599f8366cad1384e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jover Zhang
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 20:56:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Ignore `if consteval` in else-after-r
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
LGTM other than including the CWG issue to the comment. Feel free to merge
once that is in place.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
@@ -5386,6 +5386,153 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper &Helper,
+ MachineInstr &MI,
+
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for working on this, I think it's a good new feature! You should also
add a release note for it to `clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst` so users
know about the improvement.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90603
___
@@ -281,5 +282,26 @@ const QueryKind SetQueryKind::value;
const QueryKind SetQueryKind::value;
#endif
+bool FileQuery::run(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, QuerySession &QS) const {
+ auto Buffer = llvm::MemoryBuffer::getFile(StringRef{File}.trim());
+ if (!Buffer) {
+if (Prefix.h
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90603
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+m functionDecl()
AaronBallman wrote:
Can you add a few more commands to the file to show that we execute all of the
commands rather than just one?
It would also be good to have a test where the file is not found and a test
where the file is empt
https://github.com/QuietMisdreavus approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91466
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Momchil Velikov
Date: 2024-05-09T14:30:53+01:00
New Revision: e88ba6d975d887ca001cae30bfa0c53d91165148
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e88ba6d975d887ca001cae30bfa0c53d91165148
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e88ba6d975d887ca001cae30bfa0c53d91165148.dif
https://github.com/momchil-velikov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vikramRH deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-05-09T06:44:11-07:00
New Revision: 8d2ab2a0ec168673696930ba3e3c403656cdfe55
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d2ab2a0ec168673696930ba3e3c403656cdfe55
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d2ab2a0ec168673696930ba3e3c403656cdfe55.diff
LO
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2024-05-09T06:44:12-07:00
New Revision: b1b465218d1fd3e1abe9332ed9ec535c49061425
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b465218d1fd3e1abe9332ed9ec535c49061425
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b465218d1fd3e1abe9332ed9ec535c49061425.diff
LO
@@ -3730,6 +3730,12 @@ def warn_gnu_inline_cplusplus_without_extern : Warning<
"'gnu_inline' attribute without 'extern' in C++ treated as externally"
" available, this changed in Clang 10">,
InGroup>;
+def warn_sme_streaming_mode_change_no_sve : Warning<
+ "function requ
@@ -221,6 +224,15 @@ def : Pat<(AArch64_smstop (i32 svcr_op:$pstate), (i64
/*AArch64SME::Always*/0)),
(MSRpstatesvcrImm1 svcr_op:$pstate, 0b0)>;
+// Pseudo to insert cfi_offset/cfi_restore instructions. Used to save or
restore
+// the streaming value of VG around
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
Some initial comments based on a read of the ELFObjectFile. I haven't got as
far as the test and tools.
One general thought is whether it is worth adding in some more constants. For
example:
```
if (B & 1)
```
Could be something like:
```
if (B & DeltaSym
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
