Author: Serge Pavlov
Date: 2024-05-06T14:30:54+07:00
New Revision: 0140ba031c9b6a4028b36adb292fb37eb62f3dc0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0140ba031c9b6a4028b36adb292fb37eb62f3dc0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0140ba031c9b6a4028b36adb292fb37eb62f3dc0.diff
https://github.com/spavloff closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
> Thanks! I'd like to move the implementation from Parser to Preprocessor. I
> think It would make more sense to do these checks during lexing.
I'm not sure that would make a lot of sense (unless we were doing exactly how
the specification does it, by injecting a token for a fu
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/spavloff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90877
>From 5d906b537636ca0d8706a8a888dd78edfbec684f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Pavlov
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 22:28:05 +0700
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Use constant rounding mode for floating
literals
C
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
- **Reapply "[clang][dataflow] Don't propagate result objects in unevaluated
contexts (#90438)"**
- **fixup! Reapply "[clang][dataflow] Don't propagate result objects in
unevaluated contexts (#90438)"**
>
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
- **Reapply "[clang][dataflow] Don't propagate result objects in unevaluated
contexts (#90438)"**
- **fixup! Reapply "[clang][dataflow] Don't propagate result objects in
unevaluated contexts (#90438)"**
---
F
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -79,3 +79,16 @@ float V7 = []() -> float {
0x0.01p0F);
}();
// CHECK: @V7 = {{.*}} float 1.00e+00
+
+template struct L {
+ constexpr L() : value(V) {}
+ float value;
+};
+
+#pragma STDC FENV_ROUND FE_DOWNWARD
spavloff wrote:
Explicit instantiati
dyung wrote:
@yetingk, the two tests you added are failing on a couple of build bots:
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/51995
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/258/builds/17867
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/91/builds/25943
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/
martinboehme wrote:
CI failure (DataFlowSanitizer-x86_64 :: release_shadow_space.c) looks unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-06T10:37:30+02:00
New Revision: 9a521e274d0ad4a4a461952d23809320e080ffb4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a521e274d0ad4a4a461952d23809320e080ffb4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a521e274d0ad4a4a461952d23809320e080ffb4.diff
LO
https://github.com/sebastiankreutzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
>From 1f0484b73ad0bb9b40e3cd86d8abad4af14e32dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Kreutzer
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:13:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [XRay] Add DSO support for XRay instrumentatio
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+# Checkout as native, commit as LF except in specific circumstances
+* text=auto
+*.bat text eol=crlf
+*.rc text eol=crlf
+*.sln text eol=crlf
ldrumm wrote:
I think it makes sense to put the well-known-extension attributes in the root.
I don't
https://github.com/rymiel approved this pull request.
Also works well for pattern matching
```java
switch (obj) {
case String s when !s.isEmpty() -> 0;
default -> 1;
}
```
and upcoming destructuring
```java
switch (n) {
case IntExpr(int i) -> i;
case N
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-05-06T11:38:06+02:00
New Revision: 69d740e5d64257524914aabd6dfead7565185d4f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69d740e5d64257524914aabd6dfead7565185d4f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69d740e5d64257524914aabd6dfead7565185d4f.diff
LO
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 2
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu -fcomplex-ppc-gnu-abi \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-GNU-DEF
+// RUN
https://github.com/Long5hot deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 2
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu -fcomplex-ppc-gnu-abi \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-GNU-DEF
+// RUN
sdkrystian wrote:
Ping @erichkeane
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SimplyDanny updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90334
From bf9a6bb1e899b756d2d9e795f689947f2f5d6a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Danny=20M=C3=B6sch?=
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:38:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Use const& avoiding copies
---
clang/
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
>From 0ec84267ca5c76ff733c4a5907df9226260a4a76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:06:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][dataflow] Strengthen pointer comparison.
- Instead
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
> I'll change the PR accordingly and will let you know once it's ready for
> another look.
Sorry, this completely fell off my radar. I've finally revisited this now, and
the PR is ready for review again. PTAL.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
Author: Hans Wennborg
Date: 2024-05-06T12:33:48+02:00
New Revision: 6217abce86b55778cf39f7db7f591a16b9fd4d28
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6217abce86b55778cf39f7db7f591a16b9fd4d28
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6217abce86b55778cf39f7db7f591a16b9fd4d28.diff
zmodem wrote:
6217abc should fix the test failures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
>From a30530b4de31fab70911cb7b51e7a7e274fd2a38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 10:54:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] Explicit template arguments are not
su
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
Is there something specific you hit (test-case)? Either way, it's good to check
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
>From bcffb80bba2a6f9ce9eddad61b99a3e59a58f8a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:36:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit
speciali
https://github.com/sebastiankreutzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
>From 1f0484b73ad0bb9b40e3cd86d8abad4af14e32dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Kreutzer
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:13:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [XRay] Add DSO support for XRay instrumentatio
https://github.com/Keenuts approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90278
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ckandeler created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91191
None
>From d7cfeb6599fd507eed8935e452efd782fc3f0481 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Kandeler
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:20:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Support callHierarchy/outgoingCalls
---
c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Christian Kandeler (ckandeler)
Changes
---
Patch is 23.27 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91191.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) cl
Author: Michael Kruse
Date: 2024-05-06T14:04:12+02:00
New Revision: 6e31a49931b8b057868a64e89838e3c9b40f9198
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e31a49931b8b057868a64e89838e3c9b40f9198
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6e31a49931b8b057868a64e89838e3c9b40f9198.diff
https://github.com/Meinersbur closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88948
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sebastiankreutzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90959
>From 1f0484b73ad0bb9b40e3cd86d8abad4af14e32dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Kreutzer
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:13:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [XRay] Add DSO support for XRay instrumentatio
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sdkrystian wrote:
Ping @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-05-06T14:21:15+02:00
New Revision: 4d839d8f18e41bd97e1c5e82d53ad5687c07e586
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d839d8f18e41bd97e1c5e82d53ad5687c07e586
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d839d8f18e41bd97e1c5e82d53ad5687c07e586.diff
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Long5hot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
>From cc5fe4a6aa4762040077ab39edb6677f42638673 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kishan Parmar
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:18:42 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][PowerPC] Add flag to enable compatibility with
GNU
Author: Danny Mösch
Date: 2024-05-06T14:32:29+02:00
New Revision: d751e407def4e1540ae0af12a179ce4f2a8f676c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d751e407def4e1540ae0af12a179ce4f2a8f676c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d751e407def4e1540ae0af12a179ce4f2a8f676c.diff
L
https://github.com/SimplyDanny closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90334
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88963
>From bcffb80bba2a6f9ce9eddad61b99a3e59a58f8a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 13:36:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit
speciali
https://github.com/zahiraam approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2885,6 +2883,7 @@ static void RenderFloatingPointOptions(const ToolChain
&TC, const Driver &D,
Range = RangeVal;
break;
}
+
zahiraam wrote:
nit. no need for this line.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91017
__
@@ -3152,6 +3125,12 @@ static void RenderFloatingPointOptions(const ToolChain
&TC, const Driver &D,
}
break;
}
+// The StrictFPModel local variable is needed to report warnings
+// in the wat we intend. If -ffp-model=strict has been used, we
---
https://github.com/cor3ntin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91199
This completes the required language support for P2255R2.
>From dbc1c6296e943a3b9eff921e762cca641734dd3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:55:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Clan
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
This completes the required language support for P2255R2.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91199.diff
9 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst (+4-1)
- (modifi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3a3bdd8fb63ffb49741a9c32b3a5a789ce4c3b91
dbc1c6296e943a3b9eff921e762cca641734dd3d --
https://github.com/sdkrystian updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90500
>From 68ae8a9321b96da8cde1a1813d5e2b0c352649b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krystian Stasiowski
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:17:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][Sema] Earlier type checking for builtin unar
zyn0217 wrote:
I remembered @HighCommander4 had filed a similar PR at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77556. Is this one separate, or are
they actually the same (i.e. both are salvaged from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93829)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91191
___
pogo59 wrote:
My understanding is that this change never had a proper Discourse RFC, which
means it was quite possible for vendors not to have noticed it. Certainly I (on
behalf of Sony) was not aware, and I make some effort to keep an eye on things.
There is no good reason to suppose Visual S
https://github.com/ckandeler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91191
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ckandeler wrote:
> I remembered @HighCommander4 had filed a similar PR at #77556. Is this one
> separate, or are they actually the same (i.e. both are salvaged from
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D93829)?
I didn't know about that one. Seems nothing gets reviewed anymore these days.
https://github
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+//=== CIRGenAction.h - CIR Code Generation Frontend Action -*- C++
-*--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -42,6 +47,14 @@ CreateFrontendBaseAction(CompilerInstance &CI) {
StringRef Action("unknown");
(void)Action;
+ auto UseCIR = CI.getFrontendOpts().UseClangIRPipeline;
erichkeane wrote:
Thats a question I think for @AaronBallman . This DOES live in the
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fclangir -emit-cir %s
erichkeane wrote:
> We don't have any IR to test just yet. @lanza you could use `FileCheck` with
> `--allow-empty` here for now. You could also rename this test `emit-cir
tru wrote:
Yeah I think this should be brought up as an RFC in discourse. I would like to
see that we move away from two different layouts and just adopt one (my
preference is the new layout, but honestly - I don't feel that strongly about
it).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89775
https://github.com/rpereira-dev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rpereira-dev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91145
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
> Seems nothing gets reviewed anymore these days.
Yeah, and unfortunately folks who are qualified/versed in clangd indices don't
have enough bandwidths recently, nor does the author @HighCommander4.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91191
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90803
>From ecab1e5689f9f7ea6f87d9cc8c51910b733f6859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 18:10:07 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++][WIP] Move the libc++ test format to Lit
This allows the g
aganea wrote:
Ping @jansvoboda11! Are you able to get back to this soon? LG generally, just
missing a test case above. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88800
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
Seems reasonable to me. Curious about 1 change though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1779,9 +1779,8 @@ void Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(tok::TokenKind
TagTokKind,
tok::kw___is_union,
tok::kw___is_unsigned,
tok::kw___is_void,
- tok::kw___is_volatile,
- tok::kw___reference_binds_to_temporary,
- tok::kw
katzdm wrote:
👋 Friendly ping - No worries if more time is needed to consider the impact of
this one, but wanted to check if any more changes are needed at this time.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
zyn0217 wrote:
@cjdb said he had discarded the implementation of this intrinsic in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135341 because he thought this was not as trivial as
the `construct` version. Given that we have lost all the Phab histories, I
think it'd be better to invite @cjdb to take a look at th
cor3ntin wrote:
Before I do an in-depth review i think supporting arguments to `@throw` etc
makes a lot of sense.
However, I don't think we want to have a `type-id` parser in the comment
parser. The grammar is complicated, and the approach seems brittle and hard to
maintain.
Given use cases,
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
CI seems to have noticed what I feared :) This is going to hit a good amount
of our internal tests, there is no way our copy-paste cargo-cult didn't come up
with this before.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91140
_
@@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ def err_fe_no_pch_in_dir : Error<
"no suitable precompiled header file found in directory '%0'">;
def err_fe_action_not_available : Error<
"action %0 not compiled in">;
+def err_fe_invalid_multiple_actions : Error<
+"action %0 is specified, anoth
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This seems reasonable to me, I think @cor3ntin should also approve before
committing though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
pogo59 wrote:
To answer @MaskRay 's question directly, with respect to PlayStation (not
Windows, which is the major problem):
We have exactly one target, so neither the arch suffix nor a target-specific
directory are useful. (Arguably we have two targets, but as we deliver entirely
separate S
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
LGTM. I want @Endilll to confirm the DR test looks right though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/urnathan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89055
>From db5e6456f26ea9b859d3ff24161d7494d58bb7e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Sidwell
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:15:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Remove class layout scissor
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/
@@ -149,6 +149,63 @@ class TextTokenRetokenizer {
addToken();
}
+ /// Check if this line starts with @par or \par
+ bool startsWithParCommand() {
+unsigned Offset = 1;
+
+/// Skip all whitespace characters at the beginning.
+/// This needs to backtrack beca
@@ -149,6 +149,63 @@ class TextTokenRetokenizer {
addToken();
}
+ /// Check if this line starts with @par or \par
+ bool startsWithParCommand() {
+unsigned Offset = 1;
+
+/// Skip all whitespace characters at the beginning.
+/// This needs to backtrack beca
@@ -304,6 +361,23 @@ Parser::parseCommandArgs(TextTokenRetokenizer
&Retokenizer, unsigned NumArgs) {
return llvm::ArrayRef(Args, ParsedArgs);
}
+ArrayRef
+Parser::parseParCommandArgs(TextTokenRetokenizer &Retokenizer,
+unsigned NumArgs) {
---
@@ -149,6 +149,63 @@ class TextTokenRetokenizer {
addToken();
}
+ /// Check if this line starts with @par or \par
+ bool startsWithParCommand() {
+unsigned Offset = 1;
+
+/// Skip all whitespace characters at the beginning.
+/// This needs to backtrack beca
@@ -1779,9 +1779,8 @@ void Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(tok::TokenKind
TagTokKind,
tok::kw___is_union,
tok::kw___is_unsigned,
tok::kw___is_void,
- tok::kw___is_volatile,
- tok::kw___reference_binds_to_temporary,
- tok::kw
@@ -1779,9 +1779,8 @@ void Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(tok::TokenKind
TagTokKind,
tok::kw___is_union,
tok::kw___is_unsigned,
tok::kw___is_void,
- tok::kw___is_volatile,
- tok::kw___reference_binds_to_temporary,
- tok::kw
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM too
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sstwcw created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
None
>From 72e15ffb87eff94d51af69c0f804084ab7abe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
---
clang/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (sstwcw)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst (+5)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h (+5)
- (modified) c
sstwcw wrote:
Should I make dropping leading blank lines the default?
There are some tests verifying that files that start with newlines should still
start with newlines after being formatted. However, they seem to be there to
prevent the newlines from moving to wrong places.
There is 303baf
pogo59 wrote:
Driver tests are supposed to verify Driver behavior. That is, use `-###` and
make sure the correct option is being passed down to the compiler. They should
not be compiling anything.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
___
c
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
DR tests changes LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bharadwajy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90809
>From 1b6bb5bf115c9f72adde27b6d77d957edbc49321 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bharadwaj Yadavalli
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 14:42:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Set DXIL Version in DXIL target triple based on shade
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75170
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1200,6 +1224,27 @@ std::string Triple::normalize(StringRef Str) {
}
}
+ // Normalize DXIL triple if it does not include DXIL version number.
+ // Determine DXIL version number using the minor version number of Shader
+ // Model version specified in target triple,
@@ -1200,6 +1224,27 @@ std::string Triple::normalize(StringRef Str) {
}
}
+ // Normalize DXIL triple if it does not include DXIL version number.
+ // Determine DXIL version number using the minor version number of Shader
+ // Model version specified in target triple,
https://github.com/bharadwajy edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Xazax-hun wrote:
> In summary, if the storage locations for two pointers are the same, we can
> return a true literal for the comparison, but if the storage locations are
> different, we need to return an atom.
I am wondering, if it would make sense to "fix up" the state when we discover
alia
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
