@@ -364,6 +365,19 @@ IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef input) {
std::unique_ptr IncrementalParser::GenModule() {
static unsigned ID = 0;
if (CodeGenerator *CG = getCodeGen()) {
+// Clang's CodeGen is designed to work with a single llvm::Module. In many
+// ca
Author: Kadir Cetinkaya
Date: 2024-04-19T15:52:17+02:00
New Revision: ce2f6423f0168e945b6f29aa40a3054c1abe22a9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce2f6423f0168e945b6f29aa40a3054c1abe22a9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce2f6423f0168e945b6f29aa40a3054c1abe22a9.dif
kadircet wrote:
Hi @zibi2, sorry for missing the breakage in the buildbot. ce2f6423f016 should
fix it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88381
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
lawben wrote:
@efriedma-quic @fhahn just a quick ping for this PR. is something still
missing?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87750
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
Author: Dinar Temirbulatov
Date: 2024-04-19T14:02:02Z
New Revision: 9a07d7ea9b37a5b537fc8099cc5744f44da29abc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a07d7ea9b37a5b537fc8099cc5744f44da29abc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a07d7ea9b37a5b537fc8099cc5744f44da29abc.diff
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-04-19T16:26:07+02:00
New Revision: 7d8616ed500f01b201667020c9be545d686950be
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d8616ed500f01b201667020c9be545d686950be
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7d8616ed500f01b201667020c9be545d686950be.diff
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -224,11 +228,8 @@ IncrementalParser::IncrementalParser(Interpreter &Interp,
return; // PTU.takeError();
}
- if (CodeGenerator *CG = getCodeGen()) {
-std::unique_ptr M(CG->ReleaseModule());
-CG->StartModule("incr_module_" + std::to_string(P
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -307,6 +307,14 @@ def main():
"source files from compilation database to output "
"diagnostics from.",
)
+parser.add_argument(
+"-directory-filter",
+dest="directory_filter",
+action="append",
+default=[],
+help
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
Personally I do not see use case for it, as source-filter also apply to
directories, and better would be to just change source-filter to accept list of
regexes.
Other thing that directory-filter works as "exclude", not "includ
@@ -307,6 +307,14 @@ def main():
"source files from compilation database to output "
"diagnostics from.",
)
+parser.add_argument(
+"-directory-filter",
+dest="directory_filter",
+action="append",
+default=[],
+help
@@ -514,7 +523,7 @@ def main():
# Fill the queue with files.
for name in files:
-if file_name_re.search(name):
+if file_name_re.search(name) and not
directory_filters_re.search(name):
PiotrZSL wrote:
to be honest those
@@ -307,6 +307,14 @@ def main():
"source files from compilation database to output "
"diagnostics from.",
)
+parser.add_argument(
+"-directory-filter",
PiotrZSL wrote:
this basically work opposite to -source-filter, specially be
Author: Paul Robinson
Date: 2024-04-19T07:35:55-07:00
New Revision: 5fa21e5fc7384069276e15dbb1c27986a6e86483
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5fa21e5fc7384069276e15dbb1c27986a6e86483
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5fa21e5fc7384069276e15dbb1c27986a6e86483.diff
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2024-04-19T10:40:16-04:00
New Revision: 78dca4af5a9fd77972f80e9f1ff33a00b95f669e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78dca4af5a9fd77972f80e9f1ff33a00b95f669e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/78dca4af5a9fd77972f80e9f1ff33a00b95f669e.dif
https://github.com/yxsamliu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88827
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89392
In the added testcase, which is invalid code, the result of `getDecl()` called
on a `TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc` was
a `nullptr`. However, `IndexingContext::handleReference` expects the parameter
`D` to not be a `
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Julian Schmidt (5chmidti)
Changes
In the added testcase, which is invalid code, the result of `getDecl()` called
on a `TemplateTypeParmTypeLoc` was
a `nullptr`. However, `IndexingContext::handleReference` expects the parameter
`D` to not
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89392
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -657,17 +658,22 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
}
void VisitConditionalOperator(const ConditionalOperator *S) {
-// FIXME: Revisit this once flow conditions are added to the framework. For
-// `a = b ? c : d` we can add `b => a == c && !b =
zibi2 wrote:
> Hi @zibi2, sorry for missing the breakage in the buildbot.
> [ce2f642](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ce2f6423f0168e945b6f29aa40a3054c1abe22a9)
> should fix it.
Thank you for a quick fix. I confirm the fix resolved the issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
Author: Dinar Temirbulatov
Date: 2024-04-19T14:51:11Z
New Revision: 3a4bc11b675c0511319c2843221133e986825b3b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3a4bc11b675c0511319c2843221133e986825b3b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3a4bc11b675c0511319c2843221133e986825b3b.diff
5chmidti wrote:
CC @hokein
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89392
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89346
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday requested changes to this pull request.
This doesn't feel correct to me...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, &PredefinedStyle) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
-
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, &PredefinedStyle) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
+
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, &PredefinedStyle) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
+
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2 %s -S -emit-llvm
-o - | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i686-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2
https://github.com/llvm-beanz approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-04-19T17:44:12+02:00
New Revision: 64cc3fad53c8313ad2fb3f2ba2fd44f280e5babf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64cc3fad53c8313ad2fb3f2ba2fd44f280e5babf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/64cc3fad53c8313ad2fb3f2ba2fd44f280e5babf.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89204
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sam-mccall wrote:
Ilya is out on vacation, I'm able to test this and will get started on that now
(apologies for delay & thanks for digging into this)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.
owenca wrote:
Ah, I still need to do that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick 58323de2e5ed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// Check that a clang invocation can spawn and handshake with a module build
daemon
+
+// RUN: %kill-process "-cc1modbuildd mbd-handshake"
+// RUN: rm -rf mbd-handshake %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+//--- main.c
+int main() {return 0;}
+
+// RUN: %clang -fmodu
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: 58323de2e5ed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8756326045
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
https://github.c
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick 7c9c38eaa9b7
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87450
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, &PredefinedStyle) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
+
jasilvanus wrote:
> This doesn't feel correct to me...
I'd also be fine with just removing the comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
@@ -807,12 +807,18 @@ template <> struct MappingTraits {
FormatStyle PredefinedStyle;
if (getPredefinedStyle(StyleName, Style.Language, &PredefinedStyle) &&
Style == PredefinedStyle) {
- IO.mapOptional("# BasedOnStyle", StyleName);
-
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: 7c9c38eaa9b7
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8756450944
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
https://github.c
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick d61edecbfd09
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#89412
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88414
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick a7f4576ff4e2
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Arthur Eubanks
Date: 2024-04-19T09:30:47-07:00
New Revision: 1b79a34a56378f5b75fb0abd03bb7029ea1c60ec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b79a34a56378f5b75fb0abd03bb7029ea1c60ec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b79a34a56378f5b75fb0abd03bb7029ea1c60ec.diff
https://github.com/aeubanks closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
RKSimon wrote:
@Amila-Rukshan please can you rebase this patch? merge is currently failing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#89415
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86624
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
Yep.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89016
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick 29ecd6d50f14
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89016
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Troy-Butler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Troy-Butler wrote:
> > Isn't the warning about a mismatch between declaration and definition, not
> > call args? The InstCombine change does make the definition and declaration
> > match.
> > […](#)
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, at 17:07, Mehdi Amini wrote: _**@**_. commented
> > on this pull
https://github.com/Troy-Butler reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89294
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Troy-Butler wrote:
> > Isn't the warning about a mismatch between declaration and definition, not
> > call args? The InstCombine change does make the definition and declaration
> > match.
> > […](#)
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, at 17:07, Mehdi Amini wrote: _**@**_. commented
> > on this pull
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: 29ecd6d50f14
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8756865337
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
https://github.c
@@ -1292,6 +1292,31 @@ void func() {}
EXPECT_EQ(attrCount, 1);
}
+TEST_F(LibclangParseTest, clang_getSpellingLocation) {
+ std::string fileName = "main.c";
+ WriteFile(fileName, "#define X(value) int x = value;\nX(42)\n");
+
+ ClangTU = clang_parseTranslationUnit(Index, f
https://github.com/mahtohappy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89036
>From 56c2b4f70735a6ef3b80cb8461a88ea51f2d02d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahtohappy
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:48:45 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang][Sema] placement new initializes typedef array
with c
https://github.com/Krishna-13-cyber updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
>From 4e649d105a2af038e6dbd0e93b457eebea2e543a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krishna-13-cyber
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:09:26 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add optimised LLVM IR for atomic increments/decre
https://github.com/Krishna-13-cyber ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/abidh created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89418
Currently, -g defaults to line tables only. This PR changes that to full debug
information. This will allow us to test/use the upcoming debug info changes.
>From e0391084e9f8fad55c08cc642079afd8923b2729 Mon Sep 17
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-driver
Author: None (abidh)
Changes
Currently, -g defaults to line tables only. This PR changes that to full debug
information. This will allow us to test/use the upcoming debug info changes.
---
Full diff: https://gith
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: None (abidh)
Changes
Currently, -g defaults to line tables only. This PR changes that to full debug
information. This will allow us to test/use the upcoming debug info changes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
https://github.com/Sirraide created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89420
This addresses two problems observed in #89407 wrt user-defined `static_assert`
messages:
1. In `Expr::EvaluateCharRangeAsString`, we were calling `getExtValue()`
instead of `getZExtValue()`, which would asser
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Sirraide)
Changes
This addresses two problems observed in #89407 wrt user-defined
`static_assert` messages:
1. In `Expr::EvaluateCharRangeAsString`, we were calling `getExtValue()`
instead of `getZExtValue()`, which would assert if
cor3ntin wrote:
The change LGTM but it does need a release note
Thanks for fixing that!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
> The change LGTM but it does need a release note.
Oh, yeah, I somehow forgot about that because I got distracted by the second
bug; will do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
chrisnc wrote:
I've updated the PR to use the proposed approach of making `"generic"` the
default CPU for armv8r. Let me know if this is alright. I still need to fix up
a few of the tests to match this new behavior.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88287
__
https://github.com/petrhosek created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
When using Clang as a compiler, use Clang to normalize the triple that's used
to construct path for runtime library build and install paths. This ensures
that paths are consistent and avoids the issue where th
petrhosek wrote:
This is a re-upload of https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925, I plan to land this
change if there are no objections.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
When using Clang as a compiler, use Clang to normalize the triple that's used
to construct path for runtime library build and install paths. This ensures
that paths are consistent and avoids the issue where
https://github.com/js324 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86586
>From c822eaf87526567825e9c4403ae9f01dd4ff58a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jin S
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:19:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [BitInt] Expose a _BitInt literal suffix in C++
---
clang/docs/Release
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89428
Pruning non-affecting module maps is useful even when passing module maps
explicitly via `-fmodule-map-file=`. For this situation, this patch
reinstates the behavior we had prior to #87849. For the situatio
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
Pruning non-affecting module maps is useful even when passing module maps
explicitly via `-fmodule-map-file=`. For this situation, this patch
reinstates the behavior we had prior to #87849. For the
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -target-cpu core2 %s -S -emit-llvm
-o - | FileCheck %s
RKSimon wrote:
Please can you add the i686
sam-mccall wrote:
Unfortunately with this patch I'm still seeing the same
source-location-exhausted error.
I'm going to try to understand why...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89031
>From 3c9698f033c2349e698a5c98f227bfee8499e5b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:51:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Keep the first llvm::Module empty to avoid
inv
ian-twilightcoder wrote:
> Unfortunately with this patch I'm still seeing the same
> source-location-exhausted error. I'm going to try to understand why...
Damn I really thought that was going to be the one. If you have any way I could
reproduce or better write a test that would be great.
htt
MaskRay wrote:
> but since we only care about stdout/stderr, throw away the output file and
> just write to /dev/null instead.
Since `-emit-llvm-only` is now used, the commit message should be updated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242
___
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89242
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zygoloid approved this pull request.
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89428
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zygoloid wrote:
> Unfortunately with this patch I'm still seeing the same
> source-location-exhausted error.
Can you try applying #89428 as well? I think we would need both in order to
prune the module map from the serialized SLocEntries.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005
__
sam-mccall wrote:
Hmm, I locally reverted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87849 and
still see the same issue.
I'll patch #89428 instead, but I don't see how it could do better - it's just
putting the old and new behavior of #87849 behind a flag, right?
In any case I'll try it, and th
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-04-19T11:52:02-07:00
New Revision: 30b9537ff438366547f968c7909718e27d65c815
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/30b9537ff438366547f968c7909718e27d65c815
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/30b9537ff438366547f968c7909718e27d65c815.diff
@@ -8001,6 +8007,22 @@ void Sema::checkCall(NamedDecl *FDecl, const
FunctionProtoType *Proto,
}
}
+// SME functions may require SVE to be available for unwinding, as the
+// value of VG needs to be preserved across streaming-mode changes.
+if (CallerFD &
@@ -364,6 +365,19 @@ IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef input) {
std::unique_ptr IncrementalParser::GenModule() {
static unsigned ID = 0;
if (CodeGenerator *CG = getCodeGen()) {
+// Clang's CodeGen is designed to work with a single llvm::Module. In many
+// ca
zibi2 wrote:
@Sirraide, I noticed the following build issue when new compiler with this
change (bootstrap compiler) is being used to build one of the files for
`clangd`:
```
.../clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/FindTargetTests.cpp:430:29: error:
passing no argument for the '...' parameter
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89428
>From baa15bb0f35e3f9845407c6b843b82c3a466369f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:28:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][modules] Only avoid pruning module maps when
aske
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89428
>From baa15bb0f35e3f9845407c6b843b82c3a466369f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:28:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][modules] Only avoid pruning module maps when asked to
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
Depends on #89428.
>From baa15bb0f35e3f9845407c6b843b82c3a466369f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:28:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][modules] Only avoid pruning mo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
Depends on #89428.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441.diff
8 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td (+5)
- (m
jansvoboda11 wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441 might be of interest too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
jansvoboda11 wrote:
(Only commit c68b6468347e0a6141ff312139a82a3a8be9ce2e is relevant here, the
other one is from #89428.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
vikramRH wrote:
Added/updated tests for readfirstlane and writelane ops
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89217
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
101 - 200 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
