@@ -6135,6 +6141,42 @@ std::string Driver::GetProgramPath(StringRef Name, const
ToolChain &TC) const {
return std::string(Name);
}
+std::string Driver::GetStdModuleManifestPath(const Compilation &C,
+ const ToolChain &TC) const {
@@ -6135,6 +6141,42 @@ std::string Driver::GetProgramPath(StringRef Name, const
ToolChain &TC) const {
return std::string(Name);
}
+std::string Driver::GetStdModuleManifestPath(const Compilation &C,
+ const ToolChain &TC) const {
mysterymath wrote:
It looks like 30da0f5 didn't fully fix this; Fuchsia's Mac toolchain builder
just completed a run with this change that still fails that test:
https://luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-mac-x64/b8758543058445552977/test-results?sortby=&groupby=
htt
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// Test that -print-library-module-manifest-path finds the correct file.
+
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: touch %t/libc++.so
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+// RUN: cd %t
+
+// RUN: %clang -print-library-module-manifest-path \
+// RUN: -stdlib=li
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// Test that -print-library-module-manifest-path finds the correct file.
MaskRay wrote:
Is the `cxx23-` prefix useful?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76451
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2223,37 +2247,64 @@ static void createBodyOfOp(
mlir::omp::YieldOp>(
firOpBuilder, eval.getNestedEvaluations());
- // Insert the terminator.
- Fortran::lower::genOpenMPTerminator(firOpBuilder, op.getOperation(), loc);
-
@@ -2186,11 +2178,43 @@ static void createBodyOfOp(
const llvm::SmallVector &args = {},
bool outerCombined = false, DataSharingProcessor *dsp = nullptr) {
fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
+
+ auto insertMarker = [](fir::FirOpBuilder &bui
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-01-18T22:22:38+03:00
New Revision: a7588bb9bab43420f1c2642c80489f74af88f855
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7588bb9bab43420f1c2642c80489f74af88f855
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a7588bb9bab43420f1c2642c80489f74af88f855.
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Test that -print-library-module-manifest-path finds the correct file.
+
+// RUN: %clang -print-library-module-manifest-path \
MaskRay wrote:
A lot of new options do support only the `--` form. For `--print-*` options,
many support both `-` a
Endilll wrote:
@mysterymath It's a bit of a shame to admit that I missed the first half of RUN
lines in the previous follow-up. Should be fixed now by
a7588bb9bab43420f1c2642c80489f74af88f855
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77637
___
cfe-co
banach-space wrote:
> I don't know what is the right way to handle the case that users have
> conflicting flags specified.
This comment made me realise what might be the source of confusion/friction.
With `-fno-fortran-main` and `-lFortran_main`, there are two very different
mechanisms to co
atrosinenko wrote:
No-change rebase to fix merge conflicts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mshockwave updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78489
>From a69c187716153c90f50b2859212a0e5af9102fd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Min Hsu
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:28:14 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Add support for Smepmp 1.0
Smepmp is a supervisor exten
@@ -722,6 +722,11 @@ def FeatureStdExtSsaia
"'Ssaia' (Advanced Interrupt Architecture Supervisor "
"Level)", []>;
+def FeatureStdExtSmepmp
+: SubtargetFeature<"smepmp", "HasStdExtSmepmp", "true",
+ "'Smepm
MaskRay wrote:
> @MaskRay I see that in
> [3bbc912](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3bbc912d37f03d9ad3be330b81d91c2eaf6c37f2)
> you removed some tests that fail because of this change. Why do you think
> that is an appropriate solution? I have some other tests in a downstream
> pr
https://github.com/ZequanWu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75957
>From d72f0e1ad7759bad81767418604d27f11d74d6de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zequan Wu
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:32:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Profile] Allow profile merging with multiple correlate
files.
andykaylor wrote:
> I mean that we could lazily emit a helper function like
> `__clang_smiths_division_double` and call it instead of emitting like twenty
> instructions inline.
That's a reasonable suggestion. We may also want to add the ability to emit a
helper function to handle the full ra
https://github.com/mordante edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mordante requested changes to this pull request.
In general this looks good. I'd like to have another look after addressing the
comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
@@ -163,20 +163,26 @@ class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS basic_format_context basic_format_arg {
-if constexpr (same_as)
- return {};
-else if constexpr (same_as::handle>)
- // At the moment it's not possible for formatting
@@ -19,19 +19,25 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
#include "make_string.h"
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+TEST_CLANG_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED("-Wdeprecated-declarations")
+#endif
+
template
void test(From value) {
auto store = std::make_format_args(value);
const std::basic_format_a
@@ -193,7 +194,8 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Rp __visit_format_arg(_Visitor&&
__vis, basic_format_arg<
__libcpp_unreachable();
}
-# endif
+
+# endif // if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
mordante wrote:
```suggestion
# endif // if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26 && defined(
@@ -163,20 +163,26 @@ class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS basic_format_context basic_format_arg {
-if constexpr (same_as)
- return {};
-else if constexpr (same_as::handle>)
- // At the moment it's not possible for formatting
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20, c++23
// UNSUPPORTED: GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME
+// XFAIL: clang-16 || clang-17
mordante wrote:
We know it fails so there is no real need to test that.
Quite often we do XFAIL when we want to up
@@ -19,19 +19,25 @@
#include "test_macros.h"
#include "make_string.h"
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+TEST_CLANG_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED("-Wdeprecated-declarations")
+#endif
+
template
void test(From value) {
auto store = std::make_format_args(value);
const std::basic_format_a
@@ -267,7 +366,8 @@ class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS
basic_format_arg<_Context>::handle {
// This function is user facing, so it must wrap the non-standard types of
// the "variant" in a handle to stay conforming. See __arg_t for more details.
template
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI declty
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+//===--===//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI decltype(auto)
__visit_format_arg(_Visitor&& __vis, basic_
__libcpp_unreachable();
}
-# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26 && (!defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED) ||
_LIBCPP_CLANG_VER >= 1800)
---
zixu-w wrote:
IIUC this is fixed by just moving the processing of elaborated types before
pointers right? Curious what do the original declaration fragments look like.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ cl::opt ProfiledBinary(
"profiled-binary", cl::init(""),
cl::desc("Path to binary from which the profile was collected."),
cl::sub(ShowSubcommand), cl::sub(MergeSubcommand));
-cl::opt DebugInfoFilename(
-"debug-info", cl::init(""),
+cl::lis
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// REQUIRES: target={{.*windows-msvc.*}}
ZequanWu wrote:
Yes, for mingw, `-dll` doesn't work. It uses `-shared`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// Test llvm-profdata merging with multiple correlation files mixing different
correlation modes.
+
+// RUN: %clang_pgogen -o %t.normal -mllvm --disable-vp=true
%S/../Inputs/instrprof-debug-info-correlate-main.cpp
%S/../Inputs/instrprof-debug-info-correlate-fo
@@ -42,6 +43,21 @@ template BuildIDRef getBuildID(const
ELFFile &Obj) {
return {};
}
+BuildIDRef getBuildID(const COFFObjectFile *Obj) {
ZequanWu wrote:
By that, we don't have any test for it. The test
`compiler-rt/test/profile/Windows/instrprof-binary-c
@@ -35,20 +36,32 @@ class InstrProfCorrelator {
/// correlate.
enum ProfCorrelatorKind { NONE, DEBUG_INFO, BINARY };
+ struct WarningCounter {
ZequanWu wrote:
Since there is
[debate](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75957#discussion_r1433009581
https://github.com/atrosinenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78027
>From c960dacbdb58efbf2a2ef30eb4d0a9a640ce1071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoly Trosinenko
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 19:34:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64] Make Armv8.3-a extension set +pauth by default
@@ -2223,37 +2247,64 @@ static void createBodyOfOp(
mlir::omp::YieldOp>(
firOpBuilder, eval.getNestedEvaluations());
- // Insert the terminator.
- Fortran::lower::genOpenMPTerminator(firOpBuilder, op.getOperation(), loc);
-
atrosinenko wrote:
Sorry, force-pushing the rebased branch associated with the PR was a bad
idea... Restored the original commit for now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78027
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://l
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
thanks, this looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78589
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78589
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s
+#include "Inputs/std-coroutine.h"
+
+// Github issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78290
hokein wrote:
nit: we usually encode the github issue with `namespace GH78290 {...
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s
+#include "Inputs/std-coroutine.h"
+
+// Github issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78290
+class Gen {
+ public:
+class promise_type {
+ public:
+template
+explic
https://github.com/jplehr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76571
>From bf25a538e7c020efde557b595eba64b804cbb817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: JP Lehr
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 04:32:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [OpenMP][USM] Introduces -fopenmp-force-usm flag
This flag forces t
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ cl::opt ProfiledBinary(
"profiled-binary", cl::init(""),
cl::desc("Path to binary from which the profile was collected."),
cl::sub(ShowSubcommand), cl::sub(MergeSubcommand));
-cl::opt DebugInfoFilename(
-"debug-info", cl::init(""),
+cl::lis
andykaylor wrote:
> > @MaskRay I see that in
> > [3bbc912](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3bbc912d37f03d9ad3be330b81d91c2eaf6c37f2)
> > you removed some tests that fail because of this change. Why do you think
> > that is an appropriate solution? I have some other tests in a downs
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
The CI failures seem unrelated. I'll merge when the hidden e-mail address issue
has been resolved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77806
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
rjmccall wrote:
If LLVM wants to provide intrinsics that cover patterns that the frontend wants
to emit, that'd be great. The frontend will still have to make decisions about
e.g. whether to request Smith's algorithm, of course.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78330
cor3ntin wrote:
`CheckConstexprFunctionDefinition` will return false for a destructor if
`defaultedDestructorIsConstexpr` returns false (unless we want to emit a
diagnostic)`
as @groundswellaudio pointed out in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195, this is because
https://github.c
https://github.com/jonmeow updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77351
>From c090ffd9d62a8e17a757c807d010d2e0d7907e16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jonmeow
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:26:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Support] Trim trailing null character in
PrettyStackTraceFormat.
---
gbaraldi wrote:
@nikic could you rerun the compile time benchmarks?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77370
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78534
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
Similarly, `defaultedSpecialMemberIsConstexpr` should almost always return true
in c++23 ( per
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html#pnum_34
and
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html#pnum_33 )
and `CheckExplicitl
@@ -804,6 +806,46 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenMultilineString() {
FirstLineText, MultiLineString->OriginalColumn, Style.TabWidth,
Encoding);
}
+void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenNumericLikeIdentifier() {
+ FormatToken *Tok = Tokens.back();
+ // TableGen
@@ -804,6 +806,46 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenMultilineString() {
FirstLineText, MultiLineString->OriginalColumn, Style.TabWidth,
Encoding);
}
+void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenNumericLikeIdentifier() {
+ FormatToken *Tok = Tokens.back();
+ // TableGen
@@ -804,6 +806,46 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenMultilineString() {
FirstLineText, MultiLineString->OriginalColumn, Style.TabWidth,
Encoding);
}
+void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenNumericLikeIdentifier() {
+ FormatToken *Tok = Tokens.back();
+ // TableGen
@@ -804,6 +806,46 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenMultilineString() {
FirstLineText, MultiLineString->OriginalColumn, Style.TabWidth,
Encoding);
}
+void FormatTokenLexer::handleTableGenNumericLikeIdentifier() {
+ FormatToken *Tok = Tokens.back();
+ // TableGen
cor3ntin wrote:
> @Fznamznon @cor3ntin So #77753 doesn't solve the problem of the enclosing
> class of an anonymous union not being literal when it should be, right?
It should actually, CF comments in that PR (I got your code working locally)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78195
___
vitalybuka wrote:
Looks like after this patch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/236/builds/8819
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
vgvassilev wrote:
If the fix is not trivial please revert it since I am not on my laptop (very
late on my end)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
https://github.com/usx95 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78589
>From 07c6ad92fda63e69489933b5cededf8f03a68ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:38:22 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [coroutine] Create coroutine body in the correct eval
context
https://github.com/kparzysz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77761
>From 62f31654ec66fe0e2a27200d0484d3c70d4ce2c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Parzyszek
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:12:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [Flang][OpenMP] Separate creation of work-sharing an
https://github.com/syzaara updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67999
>From dced11bd242aba08158a5a0a399b2b0ea7381a69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zaara Syeda
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:01:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [AIX][TOC] Add -mtocdata/-mno-tocdata options on AIX
This patc
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI decltype(auto)
__visit_format_arg(_Visitor&& __vis, basic_
__libcpp_unreachable();
}
-# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26 && (!defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED) ||
_LIBCPP_CLANG_VER >= 1800)
---
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-01-18T13:09:13-08:00
New Revision: 160a750e63256e58fc171f1b6cccf8b61bb05f42
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/160a750e63256e58fc171f1b6cccf8b61bb05f42
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/160a750e63256e58fc171f1b6cccf8b61bb05f42.diff
L
vitalybuka wrote:
@vgvassilev I end up with suppression, please check, when you have time, if
this can be done better way, or just remove FIXME.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76218
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
@@ -1047,6 +1048,14 @@
// RUN: -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-SSAIA-EXT %s
// CHECK-SSAIA-EXT: __riscv_ssaia 100{{$}}
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32ismepmp1p0 -x c -E -dM %s \
+// RUN: -o - | FileCheck --che
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_smaia {{.*$}}
// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_ssaia {{.*$}}
+// CHECK-NOT: __riscv_smepmp {{.*$}}
topperc wrote:
This is the experimental extension section according to the comment on 115. I
guess we're bad at moving things ou
@@ -2835,6 +2835,9 @@ class Preprocessor {
if (Identifier.getIdentifierInfo()->isRestrictExpansion() &&
!SourceMgr.isInMainFile(Identifier.getLocation()))
emitRestrictExpansionWarning(Identifier);
+
+if (Identifier.getIdentifierInfo()->getName() == "INFINI
nikic wrote:
@gbaraldi New compile-time numbers:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ecd47811b755d13357085bcd7519a66d6c4d8e5c&to=f582b874c35e2b90046da8e8c30a7fa30ba08167&stat=instructions:u
(They are mildly positive now, and there are some text size reductions.)
https://gith
H-G-Hristov wrote:
Thank you for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aleks-tmb updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71531
>From c734c948599ace737d48b32a817bd6410bd2b13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksander Popov
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 05:31:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [LoopConstrainer] Apply loop gurads to check that loop bounds
H-G-Hristov wrote:
Thank you for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
H-G-Hristov wrote:
> > Thanks. The documentation build fails due to some CMake error consistently
> > otherwise I believe I addressed all comments.
> > I think I fixed this a few days ago.
>
> LGTM modulo 1 nit.
Thanx!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78157
__
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+! RUN: bbc -fopenmp -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+! Check that this test can be lowered successfully.
+! See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74348
+
+! CHECK-LABEL: func.func @_QPsb
+! CHECK: omp.parallel
kparzysz wrote:
That's done.
ht
https://github.com/unterumarmung created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78630
* Convert `collectReplacementsFromDirectory` into a function template.
* Employ explicit specialization to maintain implementation in the source file.
* Utilize the function template in the source file to el
@@ -24,14 +24,17 @@ void test(From value) {
auto store = std::make_format_args(value);
const std::basic_format_args format_args{store};
- std::visit_format_arg(
- [v = To(value)](auto a) {
-if constexpr (std::is_same_v)
- assert(v == a);
-els
https://github.com/aaupov edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76904
>From 2027bc7dc00395884c3bd4da21bbb79d079293fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 21:25:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
=?UTF-8?
https://github.com/aaupov closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76904
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
daniel-grumberg wrote:
That and the typedef case before the pointer case. The pointer check would lead
to extraneous desugaring in the fragments, i.e. you would get something like
`struct Bar * value`, because the typedefs are also pointer types and therefore
the typedef name would get bypasse
https://github.com/zixu-w approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78584
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
unterumarmung wrote:
I honestly don't who should review/approve this, but hopefully the change is
not complicated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78630
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/llvm-beanz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78635
This change adds SM 6.2 availability annotation to 16-bit APIs (16-bit types
require SM 6.2), and adds Doxygen API documentation.
>From 0e4a6081b17da6474b931dcf9250b001b95e23ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chris B (llvm-beanz)
Changes
This change adds SM 6.2 availability annotation to 16-bit APIs (16-bit types
require SM 6.2), and adds Doxygen API documentation.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78635.diff
2 Files A
https://github.com/pogo59 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78613
>From e4c9272ee9cbb918347a23d2dce14c9c12765009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Robinson
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:50:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Headers][X86] Add macro descriptions to ia32intrin.h
These a
pogo59 wrote:
> When a macro is merely an alternate name for an intrinsic function, does it
> want to be documented as its own intrinsic function? I assume yes in this
> patch, but if there's a different tactic that avoids duplicating a bunch of
> descriptions, I'm open to suggestions.
I disc
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI decltype(auto)
__visit_format_arg(_Visitor&& __vis, basic_
__libcpp_unreachable();
}
-# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26
+# if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 26 && (!defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_CLANG_BASED) ||
_LIBCPP_CLANG_VER >= 1800)
---
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -359,6 +359,13 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY PPCTargetInfo : public
TargetInfo {
bool isSPRegName(StringRef RegName) const override {
return RegName.equals("r1") || RegName.equals("x1");
}
+
+ // We support __builtin_cpu_supports/__builtin_cpu_is on targets that
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78630
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76449
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77816
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+//===--- UseStdMinMaxCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
401 - 500 of 579 matches
Mail list logo
