rorth wrote:
This patch broke the [Solaris/sparcv9
buildbot](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/72/builds/1709): the
new/changed tests `FAIL` with
```
File
/opt/llvm-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/clang-solaris11-sparcv9/llvm/clang/test/SemaCXX/format-strings-scanf.cpp
Line 25: _Floa
@@ -1249,3 +1249,5 @@ void ODRHash::AddQualType(QualType T) {
void ODRHash::AddBoolean(bool Value) {
Bools.push_back(Value);
}
+
+void ODRHash::AddInteger(unsigned Value) { ID.AddInteger(Value); }
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
It looks like the qualified related problem
vgvassilev wrote:
> > This is a great way to start a new year ;)
> > The phab link is https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416.
> > In general I was wondering could we simplify the implementation by loading
> > the specialization hash table upon module load. That should be relatively
> > cheap as we wil
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > This is a great way to start a new year ;)
> > > The phab link is https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416.
> > > In general I was wondering could we simplify the implementation by
> > > loading the specialization hash table upon module load. That should be
> > > relatively cheap
@@ -1249,3 +1249,5 @@ void ODRHash::AddQualType(QualType T) {
void ODRHash::AddBoolean(bool Value) {
Bools.push_back(Value);
}
+
+void ODRHash::AddInteger(unsigned Value) { ID.AddInteger(Value); }
vgvassilev wrote:
I guess the comment we are discussing is he
https://github.com/vgvassilev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2210,7 +2219,12 @@ CGObjCGNU::CGObjCGNU(CodeGenModule &cgm, unsigned
runtimeABIVersion,
// void objc_exception_throw(id);
ExceptionThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
- ExceptionReThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
+ if (
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72705
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/davidchisnall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77255
>From 6195e6c57b5b461dda2bffec0e5497ceb659f82c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederik Carlier
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:10:05 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Objective C: use C++ exceptions on MinGW+GNUstep
The GNU
davidchisnall wrote:
The failing format CI isn’t in this PR, rebasing to (hopefully) fix it
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -1249,3 +1249,5 @@ void ODRHash::AddQualType(QualType T) {
void ODRHash::AddBoolean(bool Value) {
Bools.push_back(Value);
}
+
+void ODRHash::AddInteger(unsigned Value) { ID.AddInteger(Value); }
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Yeah, I just saw it. My concern for reinven
skc7 wrote:
> Will wait for a rebase on some changes requested in #68865, but it'd also be
> really important to write tests for a couple more scenarios:
>
> 1. Building with `-fsanitize=address -S -emit-llvm` results in GVs with
> `sanitized_padded_global` (and results in GVs without
> `sani
vgvassilev wrote:
> > > > This is a great way to start a new year ;)
> > > > The phab link is https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416.
> > > > In general I was wondering could we simplify the implementation by
> > > > loading the specialization hash table upon module load. That should be
> > > > relati
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71919
>From 720d87366993568f47470761e4a20b071cf8c369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:45:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Interp] Diagnose reads from non-const glo
HighCommander4 wrote:
I poked at this a bit more. A few more notes:
* Since the test case currently in the patch does not trigger the crash
(without the fix), and it was not obvious to me what sort of call to
`spelledForExpanded()` to formulate to trigger the crash, I instead formulated
a te
HighCommander4 wrote:
Anyways, in a case like this, this preferable behaviour would be for
`spelledForExpanded()` to return the spelled tokens covering `int main() {`
(not including the `eof` token but including everything else), **not** nullopt.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69849
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2210,7 +2219,12 @@ CGObjCGNU::CGObjCGNU(CodeGenModule &cgm, unsigned
runtimeABIVersion,
// void objc_exception_throw(id);
ExceptionThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
- ExceptionReThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
+ if (
Author: Luke Lau
Date: 2024-01-08T16:04:33+07:00
New Revision: 2c213c45046b78eac48809b013e7a80099607ebb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c213c45046b78eac48809b013e7a80099607ebb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2c213c45046b78eac48809b013e7a80099607ebb.diff
LOG:
@@ -2519,12 +2519,17 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
addToFunctionSummaryMap(
"getcwd", Signature(ArgTypes{CharPtrTy, SizeTy}, RetType{CharPtrTy}),
Summary(NoEvalCall)
-.Case({ReturnValueCondition(BO_EQ, ArgNo(0))},
+
@@ -2519,12 +2519,17 @@ void StdLibraryFunctionsChecker::initFunctionSummaries(
addToFunctionSummaryMap(
"getcwd", Signature(ArgTypes{CharPtrTy, SizeTy}, RetType{CharPtrTy}),
Summary(NoEvalCall)
-.Case({ReturnValueCondition(BO_EQ, ArgNo(0))},
+
@@ -1444,16 +1444,26 @@ WhitespaceManager::CellDescriptions
WhitespaceManager::getCells(unsigned Start,
} else if (C.Tok->is(tok::comma)) {
if (!Cells.empty())
Cells.back().EndIndex = i;
-if (C.Tok->getNextNonComment()->isNot(tok::r_brace)) // d
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76718
>From 64039561ffa3bad6e5a0c98c729478e59777e782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:45:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?B=C3=A4der?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
@@ -75,13 +75,16 @@ void errno_mkdtemp(char *template) {
}
}
-void errno_getcwd(char *Buf, size_t sz) {
- char *Path = getcwd(Buf, sz);
- if (Path == NULL) {
-clang_analyzer_eval(errno != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
-if (errno) {} /
@@ -5151,6 +5151,14 @@ bool TokenAnnotator::mustBreakBefore(const AnnotatedLine
&Line,
return true;
if (Left.IsUnterminatedLiteral)
return true;
+ // FIXME: Breaking after newlines seems useful in general. Turn this into an
+ // option and recognize more cases like
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77288
after 20a05677f9394d4bc9467fe7bc93a4ebd3aeda61
If the overload fails, the `Best` might point to the `end()`, referencing it
leads to asan crashes.
>From 5061fbfe8c8840dc49c12bb533fa5d537efc8333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
after 20a05677f9394d4bc9467fe7bc93a4ebd3aeda61
If the overload fails, the `Best` might point to the `end()`, referencing it
leads to asan crashes.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77288
Author: Lu Haocong
Date: 2024-01-08T17:24:51+08:00
New Revision: 442f67c8702a792a135d61765909b732827d6bf2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/442f67c8702a792a135d61765909b732827d6bf2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/442f67c8702a792a135d61765909b732827d6bf2.diff
LO
https://github.com/aqjune updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77281
>From 1bbfe05bc50e1fbdb207f21a178b6fc7ab24e8cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juneyoung Lee
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 02:01:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [WebAssembly] Correctly consider signext/zext arg flags at
functio
https://github.com/fengfeng09 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77069
>From 17a9072758d9f443d0f7bca8862fec5a793c3dba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "feng.feng"
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:14:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [GVN] Disable GVN PRE on target hasBranchDivergence
Signed-off-
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72428
>From 662be3d00eed883db6b1babe489b981847e9b907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:31:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][AST] Invalidate DecompositionDecl if it has
invalid init
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
Friendly ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72428
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2210,7 +2219,12 @@ CGObjCGNU::CGObjCGNU(CodeGenModule &cgm, unsigned
runtimeABIVersion,
// void objc_exception_throw(id);
ExceptionThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
- ExceptionReThrowFn.init(&CGM, "objc_exception_throw", VoidTy, IdTy);
+ if (
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77066
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1249,3 +1249,5 @@ void ODRHash::AddQualType(QualType T) {
void ODRHash::AddBoolean(bool Value) {
Bools.push_back(Value);
}
+
+void ODRHash::AddInteger(unsigned Value) { ID.AddInteger(Value); }
vgvassilev wrote:
If the example of @hahnjo works, perhaps a
nemanjai wrote:
> @nemanjai I'm curious if you have an interest / need to support RVE or not?
I most certainly do. Thank you for alerting me to this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llv
Author: kadir çetinkaya
Date: 2024-01-08T11:11:02+01:00
New Revision: 27f547968cce89d4706ae2b27a0c15254d1670ee
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27f547968cce89d4706ae2b27a0c15254d1670ee
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27f547968cce89d4706ae2b27a0c15254d1670ee.dif
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77294
Add a new emitComplexReal() helper function and use that for the new casts as
well as the old __real implementation.
>From 1d657e65f69f3b6d4be3ce08c5f39f73d8fc04b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Add a new emitComplexReal() helper function and use that for the new casts as
well as the old __real implementation.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77294.diff
3 Files Affected:
-
https://github.com/Fznamznon approved this pull request.
Thank you very much for the fix.
I apologize for the trouble.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76979
From e24b90eebfff7a352dd2c0df7f948ffef26ea3b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:16:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Add missing stream rel
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77295
We need to handle this at the CastExpr level.
>From 4cecdb9bf613e7c4f42d6e735324a6d155467551 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:23:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We need to handle this at the CastExpr level.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77295.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp (+7)
- (modified)
@@ -37,6 +37,18 @@ constexpr _Complex int I2 = {};
static_assert(__real(I2) == 0, "");
static_assert(__imag(I2) == 0, "");
+constexpr int ignoredCast() {
+ I2;
+ (int)I2;
+ /* (float)I2; FIXME*/
+ D1;
+ /* (int)D1; FIXME*/
tbaederr wrote:
The commented-o
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77040
>From 10a0e9aae5effdd6e26476e78a778b89373358df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:05:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Improve modeling of 'getcwd' in the
StdLibraryFunctionsChecker
1
@@ -933,6 +933,9 @@ X86 Support
- Support ISA of ``AVX10.1``.
- ``-march=pantherlake`` and ``-march=clearwaterforest`` are now supported.
- Added ABI handling for ``__float128`` to match with GCC.
+- Emit Warnings for clang options to enable knl/knm. From next version
+ (LLVM
ilya-biryukov wrote:
I second everything that @HighCommander4 said. It would be really useful to add
an assertion that we never get out-of-bounds here, but this indicates a logic
error somewhere in the code that should be fixed.
I am slightly suspicious of source locations pointing at `eof` in
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-01-08T11:49:36+01:00
New Revision: 10b5b5d6e2df25dab86fe89a78c5df6f507f6e50
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10b5b5d6e2df25dab86fe89a78c5df6f507f6e50
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/10b5b5d6e2df25dab86fe89a78c5df6f507f6e50.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hokein wrote:
Thanks for the review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
From 2dc9d821aa3d100f99ac603a0880498226c94323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 00:13:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [coverage] fix incorrect coverage
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
From 8f1370aae4db2048c35516a85fb72c742557942b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 00:13:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [coverage] fix incorrect coverage repo
https://github.com/hanickadot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
From 413517b2a1d4e45b6c58ab282c7990e83f429ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Hana=20Dusi=CC=81kova=CC=81?=
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:54:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [coverage] fix incorrect coverage repo
@@ -1698,8 +1698,6 @@ FormatStyle getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LanguageKind
Language) {
/*BasedOnStyle=*/"google",
},
};
- GoogleStyle.AttributeMacros.push_back("GUARDED_BY");
ilya-biryukov wrote:
@HazardyKnusperkeks friendly ping. Any thoug
@@ -1698,8 +1698,6 @@ FormatStyle getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LanguageKind
Language) {
/*BasedOnStyle=*/"google",
},
};
- GoogleStyle.AttributeMacros.push_back("GUARDED_BY");
kadircet wrote:
FWIW, not recognizing `foo` in `int foo BAR` as s
hanickadot wrote:
Added some tests. And also adding @ornata for review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76746
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/martinboehme requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76746
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -27,9 +27,13 @@ static bool areEquivalentIndirectionValues(const Value &Val1,
}
bool areEquivalentValues(const Value &Val1, const Value &Val2) {
- return &Val1 == &Val2 || (Val1.getKind() == Val2.getKind() &&
-(isa(&Val1) ||
-
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ TEST(ValueTest, EquivalentValuesWithDifferentPropsEquivalent)
{
TopBoolValue V2(A.makeAtomRef(Atom(3)));
V1.setProperty("foo", Prop1);
V2.setProperty("bar", Prop2);
- EXPECT_TRUE(areEquivalentValues(V1, V2));
- EXPECT_TRUE(areEquivalentValues(V2, V1))
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77298
When initializing a union that constrain a struct with a flexible array member,
and the initializer list is empty, we currently trigger an assertion failure.
This happens because getFlexibleArrayInitChars() assumes
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nikita Popov (nikic)
Changes
When initializing a union that constrain a struct with a flexible array member,
and the initializer list is empty, we currently trigger an assertion failure.
This happens because getFlexibleArrayInitChars() as
yi-wu-arm wrote:
Hi @jeanPerier I have made some changes, mainly on test cases and use `char *`
instead of `std::int_8t` for arg input. Saw your activity on GitHub, could you
review the changes? Thanks in advance!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71222
yi-wu-arm wrote:
Hi, @jeanPerier welcome back! I've made quite a few changes, mainly on memory
allocate and deallocate, test improvements, and have moved some commonly used
descriptor functions into `tools.cpp` to re-use some code instead of creating
duplicates of them. Could you review the re
https://github.com/muneebkhan85 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71555
>From 7bb2f9793b2a2cccbaa401f6e2ac850b587f2b59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muneeb Khan
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:52:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [MLIR][LLVM] Add Continuous Loop Peeling transform to
SC
https://github.com/davemgreen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72273
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,816 @@
+//===- AArch64LoopIdiomTransform.cpp - Loop idiom recognition
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/davemgreen approved this pull request.
Thanks for the updates. From what I can tell this LGTM, but it will need a
rebase.
You might want to commit it with the option disabled, and then flip the switch
in a followup to avoid the commit-revert cycles in case there are any issu
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
@@ -7575,15 +7577,27 @@ static void
visitLifetimeBoundArguments(IndirectLocalPath &Path, Expr *Call,
Path.pop_back();
};
- if (ObjectArg && implicitObjectParamIsLifetimeBound(Callee))
-VisitLifetimeBoundArg(Callee, ObjectArg);
-
bool CheckCoroCall = false;
if
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77303
We don't need to do anything here, since the input is already a Pointer. The
only complexity is that we pre-classify the parameters as PT_Ptr, but they
might end up being of a different pointer type, e.g. PT_Fn
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
We don't need to do anything here, since the input is already a Pointer. The
only complexity is that we pre-classify the parameters as PT_Ptr, but they
might end up being of a different pointer type, e.g. PT
https://github.com/zahiraam ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Zahira Ammarguellat (zahiraam)
Changes
Check for comparisons to INF and NaN when in ffast-math mode and generate a
warning.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76873.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/includ
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zahiraam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jinge90 wrote:
Hi, @MaskRay and @AaronBallman
Kind ping~.
Thanks very much.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tbaederr wrote:
Needs a short release note.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -69,7 +69,10 @@
// RUN: %clang_cl -m32 -arch:avx2 --target=i386-pc-windows -### -- 2>&1 %s |
FileCheck -check-prefix=avx2 %s
// avx2: invalid /arch: argument
-// RUN: %clang_cl -m32 -arch:AVX512F --target=i386-pc-windows /c /Fo%t.obj
-Xclang -verify -DTEST_32_ARCH_AVX512F
agozillon wrote:
> Thanks for the discussion!
>
> > It defaults to on if it finds the `libc` wrapper headers in the `clang`
> > resource directory,
> > `lib/clang/18/include/llvm_libc_wrappers/llvm-libc-decls`. I'm assuming
> > that Fortran doesn't have this?
>
> It shouldn't, which means th
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-01-08T15:04:52+01:00
New Revision: f0f16be77e1977d04535556ef69eaccd5bfef36f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f0f16be77e1977d04535556ef69eaccd5bfef36f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f0f16be77e1977d04535556ef69eaccd5bfef36f.diff
LO
https://github.com/hstk30-hw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75440
>From ee562f7e8e8577ee93631a8425efd80e7ce64c18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hstk30-hw
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:40:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] feat: arm_acle.h add Coprocessor Instrinsics
---
clang/lib/Basic/
agozillon wrote:
> > I am gonna sign off for the weekend as it's quite late here, so I'll reply
> > in a little more detail on Monday and update the PR further. but I'd be
> > happy to add a further flang test, although not too sure what it'd be, so
> > suggestions are welcome.
> > I tested th
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77311
None
>From b0efa2e20f1ca7bc9e18b81231574895fe2281c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:43:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [AST] TextNodeDumper print the "implicit" bit for coroutine
AST
@@ -105,6 +106,167 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partiaIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops given
@@ -105,6 +106,167 @@ static void specializeForLoopForUnrolling(ForOp op) {
op.erase();
}
+/// Create a new for loop for the remaining iterations (partiaIteration)
+/// after a for loop has been peeled. This is followed by correcting the
+/// loop bounds for both loops given
1 - 100 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
