https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72749
>From d23305db7faba1ed1464aeee6d9e0f2ee1994226 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:50:02 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Reject incomplete type arguments for
__builtin_dump_st
zyn0217 wrote:
Thanks! Added the link.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2023-12-05T09:59:42+08:00
New Revision: b3392c447ad7b18a652d2ed63e8ebb7741077a98
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3392c447ad7b18a652d2ed63e8ebb7741077a98
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b3392c447ad7b18a652d2ed63e8ebb7741077a98.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72749
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From 5333233261a3563f80ed58250c40791bd44a9901 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This adds a per-global cod
https://github.com/heiher edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/linux4life798 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74292
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From 20069f5db5e45e4884397ebda1797d2050283854 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This adds a per-global cod
https://github.com/heiher ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -937,27 +938,105 @@ bool CodeGenAction::loadLinkModules(CompilerInstance
&CI) {
for (const CodeGenOptions::BitcodeFileToLink &F :
CI.getCodeGenOpts().LinkBitcodeFiles) {
-auto BCBuf = CI.getFileManager().getBufferForFile(F.Filename);
-if (!BCBuf) {
+
+
bcl5980 wrote:
> I think we should follow this principle： if a loop required to be unroll
> later, we should not distroy the loop count info.
The ideal is right. But I think what nikic say is loop unroll should handle the
case( upper bound unrolling). But It doesn't work. We need to find why l
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From 478cbb52d3ed3c6311389dd48c8d187cb28de18d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This adds a per-global cod
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72079
>From 478cbb52d3ed3c6311389dd48c8d187cb28de18d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This adds a per-global
https://github.com/heiher ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72079
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bcl5980 wrote:
https://godbolt.org/z/cMeE61bhf
Loop unroll with -unroll-runtime can partial unroll the case.
@nikic It looks if we don't avoid the transform, it will become a runtime
unroll.
@xiangzh1 's solution looks fine to me if we do not involve loopInfo in
simplifycfg.
https://github.co
@@ -937,27 +938,105 @@ bool CodeGenAction::loadLinkModules(CompilerInstance
&CI) {
for (const CodeGenOptions::BitcodeFileToLink &F :
CI.getCodeGenOpts().LinkBitcodeFiles) {
-auto BCBuf = CI.getFileManager().getBufferForFile(F.Filename);
-if (!BCBuf) {
+
+
dtcxzyw wrote:
Looks like the regression in `DILATE` has been addressed.
Could you please have a look at
`MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-
https://github.com/EsmeYi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70642
>From 7ba6a651bb84befdcd1566352d5340880591789d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: esmeyi
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 06:00:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Add support for parsing auxiliary symbols of XCOFF object
file for o
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66583
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
Unless you want this to be merged as
44101708+5chmi...@users.noreply.github.com, correct your github settings,
squash all commits into one and make sure that author of commit is correct.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66583
___
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - modernize-use-std-numbers
+
+modernize-use-std-numbers
+=
+
+Finds constants and function calls to math functions that can be replaced
+with c++20's mathematical constants from the ``numbers`` header and offers
+fix
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - modernize-use-std-numbers
+
+modernize-use-std-numbers
+=
+
+Finds constants and function calls to math functions that can be replaced
+with c++20's mathematical constants from the ``numbers`` header and offers
+fix
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74020
>From 81701bfc9052eed567abb76ac05d44cb99298303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ziqingluo-90
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:37:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Thread safety analysis: Fix a bug in handling temporary
const
https://github.com/ziqingluo-90 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74020
>From 9c2718abce31d61c079e0945313fe14ad0f334b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ziqingluo-90
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:37:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Thread safety analysis: Fix a bug in handling temporary
const
@@ -2487,15 +2486,15 @@ void
ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
// Clean up constructed object even if there are no attributes to
// keep the number of objects in limbo as small as possible.
- if (auto Object = LocksetBui
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+//===--- MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+//===--- MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/PiotrZSL commented:
Few issues with `unaryOperator` left, after that will be fixed, it would look
fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67467
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+//===--- MoveSharedPointerContentsCheck.h - clang-tidy --*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/EsmeYi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74415
>From f6d0ef8357540c61a9c20774e3b170a8db5b72ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: esmeyi
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 00:44:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Exploit STMW and LMW in 32-bit big-endian mode.
---
llvm/lib/Target/Powe
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74419
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72383
It looks incorrect or odd for the BMIs to dependent on the real files. It
prevents we moving the BMIs and the distributed builds. And it looks like ther
xiangzh1 wrote:
> So where is the different X86 can partial unroll but AMDGPU can not unroll at
> all?
> https://godbolt.org/z/cMeE61bhf Loop unroll with -unroll-runtime can partial
> unroll the case. @nikic It looks if we don't avoid the transform, it will
> become a runtime unroll. The case
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72383
It looks incorrect or odd for the BMIs to dependent on the real files. It
prevents we moving the BMIs and the distributed builds. And it looks
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74419
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -inline -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @inline_negative_stride
+func.func @inline_negative_stride(%arg0 : memref<10xf32>) -> memref<1xf32,
strided<[?], offset: 1>> {
+ cf.br ^bb1(%arg0 : memref<10xf32>)
+^bb1(%m: me
dwblaikie wrote:
I'd still like to know more about what other implementations do - see ongoing
discussion on the original issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74419
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
joker-eph wrote:
> Is it possible to add the test case (or minimal similar example) with
> `--inline` option so that we can confirm the original issue is resolved.
>
> #73383
It is common that the person filing the issue does not reduce the IR or the
pipeline that causes the bug.
In particul
@@ -2399,6 +2405,30 @@ bool PPCFrameLowering::assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots(
return AllSpilledToReg;
}
+static void findContinuousLoadStore(ArrayRef CSI,
+Register &MergeFrom) {
+ CalleeSavedInfo BeginI = CSI[0];
ecnelises
@@ -1676,6 +1676,10 @@
PPCRegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
bool noImmForm = !MI.isInlineAsm() && OpC != TargetOpcode::STACKMAP &&
OpC != TargetOpcode::PATCHPOINT && !ImmToIdxMap.count(OpC);
ecnelises wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=powerpc-unknown-aix-xcoff -verify-machineinstrs \
+; RUN: -mcpu=pwr4 -mattr=-altivec --ppc-enable-load-store-multiple < %s \
+; RUN: | FileCheck %s
+
+; CHECK: stmw 16, 64(1) # 4-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK: lmw 16, 64(1)# 4-byte
@@ -2513,7 +2548,23 @@ bool PPCFrameLowering::spillCalleeSavedRegisters(
!MF->getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoUnwind))
TII.storeRegToStackSlotNoUpd(MBB, MI, Reg, !IsLiveIn,
I.getFrameIdx(), RC, TRI);
-
@@ -2607,6 +2658,11 @@ bool PPCFrameLowering::restoreCalleeSavedRegisters(
unsigned CSIIndex = 0;
BitVector Restored(TRI->getNumRegs());
+ Register MergeFrom = PPC::R31;
+ if (EnableLoadStoreMultiple && !Subtarget.isLittleEndian() &&
+ !Subtarget.isPPC64())
+fin
@@ -2399,6 +2405,30 @@ bool PPCFrameLowering::assignCalleeSavedSpillSlots(
return AllSpilledToReg;
}
+static void findContinuousLoadStore(ArrayRef CSI,
+Register &MergeFrom) {
+ CalleeSavedInfo BeginI = CSI[0];
+ unsigned I = 1, E = CSI.
xen0n wrote:
I think we should initially only support the attribute on LoongArch. GCC's
`model` attribute is only ever supported on ia64 and loongarch, yet the patch
currently seems to allow other architectures to use this attribute, with LLVM
code model names accepted -- this may or may not b
bwendling wrote:
Okay, this was tougher than I thought. I make sure that we're not causing any
new side-effects in the code. I try as much as possible to use previously
generated code when accessing the `counted_by` variable. I also corrected how
offsets were calculated.
There are some a few
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2023-12-05T11:23:32+04:00
New Revision: d11d38cb095b7f86d4c1298ea9806099d2fc4bd6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d11d38cb095b7f86d4c1298ea9806099d2fc4bd6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d11d38cb095b7f86d4c1298ea9806099d2fc4bd6.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From e3863873ab817dacf8680763bb42d91f005fe5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This patch adds a per-glob
https://github.com/heiher edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xen0n commented:
There should also be a test case that shows the attribute is not supported on a
non-LoongArch target. Otherwise this mostly looks fine to me, thanks for
pushing this forward!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
https://github.com/xen0n edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3369,6 +3369,33 @@ static void handleSectionAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
}
+static void handleCodeModelAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef CM;
+ StringRef Str;
+ SourceLocation LiteralLoc;
+ bool Ok = false;
+ // Check tha
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ global variable or function should be in after translation.
let Heading = "section, __declspec(allocate)";
}
+def CodeModelDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatVariable;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``model`` attribute allows you to specify a specifi
https://github.com/xgupta created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74427
The issue with size_t comes when we are trying to add -Wtype-limits to -Wextra
for GCC compatibility in review https://reviews.llvm.org/D142826.
Example of issue (false positive) -
$ cat clang/test/Sema/type-lim
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Shivam Gupta (xgupta)
Changes
The issue with size_t comes when we are trying to add -Wtype-limits to -Wextra
for GCC compatibility in review https://reviews.llvm.org/D142826.
Example of issue (false positive) -
$ cat clang/test/Sema/type
https://github.com/heiher updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72078
>From e3863873ab817dacf8680763bb42d91f005fe5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WANG Rui
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:07:48 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Add per-global code model attribute
This patch adds a per-
@@ -3369,6 +3369,33 @@ static void handleSectionAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
}
}
+static void handleCodeModelAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef CM;
+ StringRef Str;
+ SourceLocation LiteralLoc;
+ bool Ok = false;
+ // Check tha
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ global variable or function should be in after translation.
let Heading = "section, __declspec(allocate)";
}
+def CodeModelDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatVariable;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``model`` attribute allows you to specify a specifi
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71771
>From 06c4cf02dfb4b20c8349c5f3c7209276f6d56edf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 02:21:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Fix clang to recognize new C23 modifiers %w and %wf when
pri
Author: Yonggang Luo
Date: 2023-12-05T15:49:31+08:00
New Revision: 8cfdd37088d662338ec85ac15721dddf3f6d8db6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8cfdd37088d662338ec85ac15721dddf3f6d8db6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8cfdd37088d662338ec85ac15721dddf3f6d8db6.diff
https://github.com/phoebewang closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68618
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Phoebe Wang
Date: 2023-12-05T15:58:55+08:00
New Revision: 0ca80eb5e814a6d061556888c9c9fbd04f054a80
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ca80eb5e814a6d061556888c9c9fbd04f054a80
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0ca80eb5e814a6d061556888c9c9fbd04f054a80.diff
L
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
@@ -422,3 +422,28 @@
// RUN: touch %t.o
// RUN: %clang -fdriver-only -Werror --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-mharden-sls=all %t.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | count 0
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -mapxf %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=APXF %s
+// RUN:
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1715,6 +1716,129 @@ static void findCSKYMultilibs(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &TargetTriple,
Result.Multilibs = CSKYMultilibs;
}
+/// Extend the multi-lib re-use selection mechanism for RISC-V.
+/// This funciton will try to re-use multi-lib if they are compat
@@ -1715,6 +1716,129 @@ static void findCSKYMultilibs(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &TargetTriple,
Result.Multilibs = CSKYMultilibs;
}
+/// Extend the multi-lib re-use selection mechanism for RISC-V.
+/// This funciton will try to re-use multi-lib if they are compat
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
@@ -5999,6 +5999,12 @@ def mno_gather : Flag<["-"], "mno-gather">,
Group,
HelpText<"Disable generation of gather instructions in
auto-vectorization(x86 only)">;
def mno_scatter : Flag<["-"], "mno-scatter">, Group,
HelpText<"Disable generatio
martinboehme wrote:
> Overall, I love it! I have some comments on some features in the future, but
> those are probably not going to be addressed any time soon. First of all, I
> think in the future when we reason about the values of the pointers,
> synthetic fields might need to have offsets
@@ -1715,6 +1716,129 @@ static void findCSKYMultilibs(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &TargetTriple,
Result.Multilibs = CSKYMultilibs;
}
+/// Extend the multi-lib re-use selection mechanism for RISC-V.
+/// This funciton will try to re-use multi-lib if they are compat
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2023-12-04T09:29:22+01:00
New Revision: 71f2ec2db1295462d61e1407fcc1e715ba5d458b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71f2ec2db1295462d61e1407fcc1e715ba5d458b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71f2ec2db1295462d61e1407fcc1e715ba5d458b.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73860
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1715,6 +1716,129 @@ static void findCSKYMultilibs(const Driver &D, const
llvm::Triple &TargetTriple,
Result.Multilibs = CSKYMultilibs;
}
+/// Extend the multi-lib re-use selection mechanism for RISC-V.
+/// This funciton will try to re-use multi-lib if they are compat
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+// Test case for scanning input of GCC output as multilib config
4vtomat wrote:
No we don't use gcc, it's a copy mistake from downstream lol~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73765
___
cfe-co
https://github.com/xiangzh1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74268
>From 21fef821eb83d0d426a5e2de20469dcdd41598f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Xiang
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:25:37 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SimplifyCFG] Pre-commit test for folding branches in
simplify
https://github.com/4vtomat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73765
>From 0c5f7497a8ce41695cba8f16a9402d74e4f798ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Wu
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:27:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Implement multi-lib reuse rule for RISC-V
bare-metal to
4vtomat wrote:
Resolved the comments and also modified the commit messages.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73765
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xiangzh1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74268
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xiangzh1 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74268
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
xiangzh1 wrote:
> > > And I think you need to precommit tests first.
Done
> > In fact, there is no direct/strong relation with stack cost, it mostly base
> > on unroll or not (or other loop optimizations). Maybe we should check
> > "unroll" info (e.g #pragma unroll, any targets with this hint s
https://github.com/KanRobert updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
>From 246d6e2bc3f6fb60623b5d4c3f07b53c628ed88a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shengchen Kan
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 23:52:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [X86] Support CFE flags for APX features
Positive options:
@@ -422,3 +422,28 @@
// RUN: touch %t.o
// RUN: %clang -fdriver-only -Werror --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-mharden-sls=all %t.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | count 0
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -mapxf %s -### -o %t.o 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=APXF %s
https://github.com/KanRobert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74291
None
>From 2b8903b380c38c2d7f50491da75cec25ff4b801c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:41:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer][NFC] Supplement comments in `evalFtell` of
th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Ben Shi (benshi001)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74291.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StreamChecker.cpp (+3)
``diff
diff --git a/cl
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-12-04T17:05:27+08:00
New Revision: db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db3d0e4dfa34e59fab90c0726a6722f82db48462.diff
LO
https://github.com/linux4life798 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74292
None
>From 22b357ace6de02e537b5fbc217febe8cd59ae40a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Hesling
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 15:59:00 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclang/python] Update README.txt path
Update t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Craig Hesling (linux4life798)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74292.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/bindings/python/README.txt (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py (+1-1)
Author: Samira Bazuzi
Date: 2023-12-04T10:10:07+01:00
New Revision: a3fe9cb24da302a40c53d187271e472a6432c4f1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a3fe9cb24da302a40c53d187271e472a6432c4f1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a3fe9cb24da302a40c53d187271e472a6432c4f1.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74293
This is a rework of #74176.
>From fddf15404c0f5de2d9b264413b94d45a4a73edde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 01:03:18 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Fix a bug in `git-clang-form
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
This is a rework of #74176.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74293.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/tools/clang-format/git-clang-format (+3-2)
``diff
diff --gi
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
> Could you please rebase this patch on #74246 and add a test for #74242?
Done. The new test is `@div_by_zero_or_one_from_dom_cond`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
101 - 200 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
