@@ -1222,6 +1222,15 @@ void ExprEngine::ProcessInitializer(const CFGInitializer
CFGInit,
PostInitializer PP(BMI, FieldLoc.getAsRegion(), stackFrame);
evalBind(Tmp, Init, Pred, FieldLoc, InitVal, /*isInit=*/true, &PP);
}
+ } else if (BMI->isBaseInitializer() &&
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
@@ -1222,6 +1222,15 @@ void ExprEngine::ProcessInitializer(const CFGInitializer
CFGInit,
PostInitializer PP(BMI, FieldLoc.getAsRegion(), stackFrame);
evalBind(Tmp, Init, Pred, FieldLoc, InitVal, /*isInit=*/true, &PP);
}
+ } else if (BMI->isBaseInitializer() &&
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
steakhal wrote:
Feel free to put a full link if you want.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 562ce8bbd23d96ee64992bcda041bf67e7c51057
c1c5174d9a9bb82ba42de0aabd0a3e129cc87aa5 --
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 562ce8bbd23d96ee64992bcda041bf67e7c51057
65c1b38c4eb83469794e53328caed492e956a728 --
https://github.com/Maddobun updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70798
>From f2dd9b98a6dab3bf6c1cc06df8262313d62ecbe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo Zhu
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:27:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Sanitize path before recording into IncludeStructure
addresses https:
https://github.com/kuganv created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70801
clang-apply-replacements is now applying format even when --format is not
specified. Methods like createReplacementsForHeaders only takes the Spec.Style
and would re-order the headers even when it was not reques
https://github.com/kuganv edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70540
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -fno-builtin
-analyzer-checker=core,alpha.unix.Stream -verify %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+typedef struct _FILE FILE;
+
+// These functions are not standard C library functions.
+FILE *tmpfile(const char *restrict path);
+FILE *fo
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
Still looks good to me.
I recommended a couple comments here and there to clarify the intent of the
test, and to raise awareness.
I'd suggest to reword the PR title (and the commit title ofc) to something like
`[analyzer] Restr
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -fno-builtin
-analyzer-checker=core,alpha.unix.Stream -verify %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+typedef struct _FILE FILE;
+
+// These functions are not standard C library functions.
+FILE *tmpfile(const char *restrict path);
+FILE *fo
BeMg updated this revision to Diff 557943.
BeMg added a comment.
Herald added a reviewer: aaron.ballman.
Align with spec
1. duplicate target attribute will cause compilation fail
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151730/new/
https://re
Author: Jake Egan
Date: 2023-10-31T09:38:45-04:00
New Revision: 913a1d5a5a1ba6e85144b21cde82a27a9c7e1a70
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/913a1d5a5a1ba6e85144b21cde82a27a9c7e1a70
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/913a1d5a5a1ba6e85144b21cde82a27a9c7e1a70.diff
LOG
@@ -846,6 +859,19 @@ void PPCAsmPrinter::emitInstruction(const MachineInstr
*MI) {
return MCSymbolRefExpr::VariantKind::VK_PPC_AIX_TLSGDM;
if (MO.getTargetFlags() & PPCII::MO_TLSGD_FLAG)
return MCSymbolRefExpr::VariantKind::VK_PPC_AIX_TLSGD;
+if (MO.getTarg
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
-
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70056
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
-
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
Looks good. I only have minor remarks.
Consider renaming the PR `Improve reports` -> `Improve messages`, or
`diagnostics`, to highlight that the "messages" aspect is improved, n
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
-
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
-
https://github.com/arsenm commented:
Needs test
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70760
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9893,24 +9888,40 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::FormSVEBuiltinResult(Value
*Call) {
return Call;
}
-Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64SVEBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
- const CallExpr *E) {
+void CodeGenFunction::GetAArch6
@@ -9893,24 +9888,40 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::FormSVEBuiltinResult(Value
*Call) {
return Call;
}
-Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64SVEBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
- const CallExpr *E) {
+void CodeGenFunction::GetAArch6
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
I think the changes make sense.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70799
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/DonatNagyE updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70056
>From 77143e74edda6177248bebdf0424db915aa68a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
I don't have a good idea how a release note could be phrased here, but if you
could try one, it would be appreciated and I think it is worth doing.
Side note: it would be really cool if at the end of the release cycle, you did
a section in the release-n
https://github.com/diggerlin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67999
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ZequanWu wrote:
I think it's fine to land as this is already reviewed & approved at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69656
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70712
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
https://github.com/ZequanWu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70712
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Zequan Wu
Date: 2023-10-31T10:41:01-04:00
New Revision: 4b383d0af93136b80841fc140da0823dfc441dd4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4b383d0af93136b80841fc140da0823dfc441dd4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4b383d0af93136b80841fc140da0823dfc441dd4.diff
LOG
rapidsna wrote:
> The other experimental flags I see start with experimental, this one ends
> with it. Why isn't this called `-fexerimental-bounds-safety`?
Oh, I can see most of them start with `-fexperimental`, not everything though.
I can fix this. Is there a formal convention?
https://gith
https://github.com/ilg-ul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68091
>From f3812174546270051c4a2903b9a99408bf5b7ba0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liviu Ionescu
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:07:48 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [clang][driver] Use platform specific calls to get the
executa
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ For later versions of Visual Studio, no setup is required-->
{IncludeMacroStack._Mypair._Myval2._Mylast - 1,na}
{CurLexer._Mypair._Myval2,na}
Expanding
Macro: {CurTokenLexer._Mypair._Myval2,na}
-
AaronBallman wrote:
Yeah,
@@ -767,7 +762,7 @@ class Preprocessor {
/// \#included, and macros currently being expanded from, not counting
/// CurLexer/CurTokenLexer.
struct IncludeStackInfo {
-enum CurLexerKind CurLexerKind;
+LexerCallback CurLexerCallback;
Aaron
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
https://github.com/ilg-ul closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68091
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ struct __fn {
_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED(!bool(std::invoke(__comp, std::invoke(__proj,
__high), std::invoke(__proj, __low))),
ldionne wrote:
@var-const I think we have an interesting case here. This assertion causes the
complexity guar
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy ,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -174,9 +176,119 @@ compareValueToThreshold(ProgramStateRef State, NonLoc
Value, NonLoc Threshold,
return {nullptr, nullptr};
}
-void ArrayBoundCheckerV2::checkLocation(SVal location, bool isLoad,
ZequanWu wrote:
Reverted at db7a1ed9a22fadacfa651e88d0f75f365d44af9a.
The
[build](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/52535/steps/6/logs/stdio)
shows bunch linking failures, but I can build those failed targets locally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70712
_
@@ -3553,6 +3553,49 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifie
@@ -3553,6 +3553,49 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifie
@@ -3553,6 +3553,49 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifie
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ExprDependenceScope {
using ExprDependence = ExprDependenceScope::ExprDependence;
struct TypeDependenceScope {
- enum TypeDependence : uint8_t {
+ enum TypeDependence : unsigned {
AaronBallman wrote:
Now that we're reviewing https:/
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2023-10-31T18:06:34+03:00
New Revision: 49fd28d9601dde429436655ec74234e895c60b89
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/49fd28d9601dde429436655ec74234e895c60b89
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/49fd28d9601dde429436655ec74234e895c60b89.
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ExprDependenceScope {
using ExprDependence = ExprDependenceScope::ExprDependence;
struct TypeDependenceScope {
- enum TypeDependence : uint8_t {
+ enum TypeDependence : unsigned {
Endilll wrote:
Yeah, I'm putting this on hold for a
@@ -4016,7 +4016,63 @@ Clang expects the GCC executable "gcc.exe" compiled for
AIX
^^^
+TOC Data Transformation
+"""
+TOC data transformation is off by default (``-mno-tocdata``).
+When ``-mtocdata`` is specified, the TOC data transformation will be applied
https://github.com/ilg-ul created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70817
On macOS, when clang is invoked via a symlink, since the InstalledDir is where
the link is located, the C++ headers are not identified and the default system
headers are used.
```console
% ln -s
/Users/ilg/Libr
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Liviu Ionescu (ilg-ul)
Changes
On macOS, when clang is invoked via a symlink, since the InstalledDir is where
the link is located, the C++ headers are not identified and the default system
headers are used.
```console
% ln -s /Use
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70639
>From 18db082fc5008283f77cc98d9c733a47c63b7096 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:19:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][DebugInfo] Emit global variable definitions for
st
https://github.com/quic-akaryaki updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65815
>From 21ba98fbed6ef3b9bbbef96feb6dfeb0679f7ce8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexey Karyakin
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 15:46:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [llvm-objcopy] Add --gap-fill and --pad-to options
`-
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2636,30 +2636,30 @@ template Error ELFWriter::finalize()
{
}
Error BinaryWriter::write() {
- SmallVector LoadableSections;
+ SmallVector BitsSections;
quic-akaryaki wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65815
@@ -67,12 +67,18 @@ using namespace llvm::object;
// The name this program was invoked as.
static StringRef ToolName;
-static ErrorSuccess reportWarning(Error E) {
+namespace llvm {
+namespace objcopy {
+
+ErrorSuccess reportWarning(Error E) {
quic-akaryaki wr
@@ -163,8 +163,8 @@ Sections:
EntSize: 0x0001
Content: 4743433A
-## In this test, output sections are defined out of in respect to their load
-## addresses. Verify that gaps are still correctly filled.
+## In this test, output sections are defined out o
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2023-10-31T18:21:36+03:00
New Revision: f5f4c5b313fc809b9b1b9d600d0ec3cec0d12941
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5f4c5b313fc809b9b1b9d600d0ec3cec0d12941
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f5f4c5b313fc809b9b1b9d600d0ec3cec0d12941.
https://github.com/eopXD closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ZequanWu wrote:
I can repro the linking failures when using the same cmake invocation.
Here is the full command:
```
$ /usr/bin/c++ -std=c++11 -Wno-documentation-deprecated-sync -fPIC
-fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time
-fno-lifetime-dse -Wall -Wextra -Wn
ilg-ul wrote:
@Endilll, @AaronBallman, @bjope, @mstorsjo, this is a cleanup of a previous PR
(#68091) where you contributed.
Could you take a second look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70817
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.
@@ -396,3 +396,115 @@ true:
false:
ret i32 33
}
+
+declare i32 @llvm.amdgcn.icmp.i32(i1, i1, i32)
+
+define amdgpu_cs i32
@branch_divergent_simulated_negated_ballot_ne_zero_and(i32 %v1, i32 %v2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: branch_divergent_simulated_negated_ballot_ne_zero_and:
+; CHEC
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2023-10-31T10:41:59-05:00
New Revision: b0997097355b3578c8061373899770928096f36b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b0997097355b3578c8061373899770928096f36b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b0997097355b3578c8061373899770928096f36b.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70799
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ldionne wrote:
@cor3ntin This is really nice, thanks for the patch! The CI should pass if you
merge `main` into your branch -- you were the victim of a temporary CI issue
that has been fixed since then.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70353
___
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> Might be good to backport this to 17.x, given the regression was introduced
> on the 17 branch after 17.0.0
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project-release-prs/pull/765
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70366
___
cfe-com
vpykhtin wrote:
With the latest commit I added a guard to skip _ballot.i64_ in wave32 mode
because it's lowered with _i64 AMDGPUISD::SETCC_ - this should be fixed with
i32 result similar to ICMP/FCMP intrinsics. After a fix that follows this PR
I'm going to turn the guard into assert - TODO is
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Because we're on the fence about whether this has value and we're getting early
feedback about diagnostic chattiness and we lack adequate test coverage for the
changes, I think it's reasonable to back this out for now.
It might make m
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
From a5929ddc33057416cee75d91f13a1252f4357524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 18:05:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Defer the instantiation of explicit-specifier after
constraint che
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2023-10-31T23:59:47+08:00
New Revision: e107c9468b9c734fba016166fccc82a7e2b6527b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e107c9468b9c734fba016166fccc82a7e2b6527b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e107c9468b9c734fba016166fccc82a7e2b6527b.diff
LO
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3553,6 +3553,49 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifie
https://github.com/LYP951018 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
From a5929ddc33057416cee75d91f13a1252f4357524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 18:05:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Defer the instantiation of explicit-specifier after
constraint che
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang -c %s -### 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix T0 %s
nickdesaulniers wrote:
I would have expected a test like this to be added to
clang/test/Driver/clang_f_opts.c
---
why are the new tests in clang/test/BoundsSafety/ rather than the
@@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ def warn_alias_with_section : Warning<
"as the %select{aliasee|resolver}2">,
InGroup;
+let CategoryName = "Bounds Safety Issue" in {
+def err_bounds_safety_lang_not_supported : Error<
+ "bounds safety is only supported for C">;
+def warn_bounds_safety
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: not %clang -fbounds-safety-experimental -x c++ %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix ERR %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang -fbounds-safety-experimental -x objective-c %s 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix ERR %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang -fbounds-safety-experimental -x obje
@@ -3618,6 +3618,30 @@ void CompilerInvocationBase::GenerateLangArgs(const
LangOptions &Opts,
GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_frandomize_layout_seed_EQ, Opts.RandstructSeed);
}
+static void CheckBoundsSafetyLang(InputKind IK, DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
+ // Currently, bounds
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 39b939555f959b93061b3c4c8fffc13a63737074
991212294aefaff304610213baaee927634a6c55 --
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
From a5929ddc33057416cee75d91f13a1252f4357524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 18:05:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Defer the instantiation of explicit-specifier after
constraint che
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
>From fa7f1d1a862d584d42e9f4a44660f6f61501b150 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:41:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Fix uninitialized base class with initializer list
when c
Author: Adrian Prantl
Date: 2023-10-31T09:10:50-07:00
New Revision: 1adb898e2db980fc402b8eac7ebc762c75d05826
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1adb898e2db980fc402b8eac7ebc762c75d05826
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1adb898e2db980fc402b8eac7ebc762c75d05826.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70480
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ def warn_alias_with_section : Warning<
"as the %select{aliasee|resolver}2">,
InGroup;
+let CategoryName = "Bounds Safety Issue" in {
+def err_bounds_safety_lang_not_supported : Error<
+ "bounds safety is only supported for C">;
+def warn_bounds_safety
@@ -3553,6 +3553,49 @@ static unsigned getPackIndexForParam(Sema &S,
llvm_unreachable("parameter index would not be produced from template");
}
+// if `Specialization` is a `CXXConstructorDecl` or `CXXConversionDecl`
+// we try to instantiate and update its explicit specifie
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang -c %s -### 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix T0 %s
MaskRay wrote:
`clang/test/Driver/clang_f_opts.c` mixes a lot of options. Newer `-fxxx` tests
can go to a dedicated `clang/test/Driver/fxxx.c`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+; RUN: %clang -fbounds-safety-experimental -x ir -S %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %clang_cc1 -fbounds-safety-experimental -x ir -S %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s
+
MaskRay wrote:
We usually test `%clang` for driver and `%clan
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: not %clang -fbounds-safety-experimental -x c++ %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix ERR %s
+
MaskRay wrote:
We use a terse style and use a blank line to group different sets of tests.
Here the blank line use is unnecessary and harms reada
@@ -2005,14 +2039,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
// Decl
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::VBR, 6)); // DeclContext
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // LexicalDeclContext
- Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // isInv
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69287
>From ae4ee482f5b6b5d2487ed642b92e513ffd269781 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:41:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Serializer] Pack bits into integers
Previously, the boolean
@@ -2005,14 +2039,11 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteDeclAbbrevs() {
// Decl
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(BitCodeAbbrevOp::VBR, 6)); // DeclContext
Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // LexicalDeclContext
- Abv->Add(BitCodeAbbrevOp(0)); // isIn
https://github.com/apolloww closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70567
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
apolloww wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. I haven't looked into the details. But I guess
> it may be a good idea to teach `DiagnoseUnusedParameters` to understand
> coroutines.
Yeah, I think it could also make user aware of unused parameters so
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
https://github.com/apolloww reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70567
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/LYP951018 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70548
From b62beb7553f098488e64c81995558c19cd36d785 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 18:05:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Defer the instantiation of explicit-specifier after
constraint che
101 - 200 of 548 matches
Mail list logo
