@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ class AttributeCommonInfo {
IsRegularKeywordAttribute(IsRegularKeywordAttribute) {}
constexpr Form(tok::TokenKind Tok)
: SyntaxUsed(AS_Keyword), SpellingIndex(SpellingNotCalculated),
- IsAlignas(Tok == tok::kw_alignas),
+
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ def err_invalid_branch_protection_spec : Error<
"invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '%0'">;
def warn_unsupported_branch_protection_spec : Warning<
"unsupported branch protection specification '%0'">,
InGroup;
+def warn_attribute_und
https://github.com/mshockwave created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69747
Translate `-fglobal-isel` to `-plugin-opt=-global-isel=1`.
>From 8abc9204d4148f1b224623ac54d5f58e2ab04e6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Min-Yih Hsu
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:03:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Cla
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Min-Yih Hsu (mshockwave)
Changes
Translate `-fglobal-isel` to `-plugin-opt=-global-isel=1`.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69747.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ def err_invalid_branch_protection_spec : Error<
"invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '%0'">;
def warn_unsupported_branch_protection_spec : Warning<
"unsupported branch protection specification '%0'">,
InGroup;
+def warn_attribute_und
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ class AttributeCommonInfo {
IsRegularKeywordAttribute(IsRegularKeywordAttribute) {}
constexpr Form(tok::TokenKind Tok)
: SyntaxUsed(AS_Keyword), SpellingIndex(SpellingNotCalculated),
- IsAlignas(Tok == tok::kw_alignas),
+
https://github.com/jerinphilip edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jerinphilip edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dwblaikie edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69431
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dwblaikie approved this pull request.
Some minor comments but generally looks good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69431
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -6870,8 +6852,38 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
Args.AddLastArg(CmdArgs, options::OPT_finline_max_stacksize_EQ);
+ // FIXME: Find a better way to determine whether we are in C++20.
+ bool HaveCxx20 =
+ Std &&
+ (Std->contain
@@ -6870,8 +6852,38 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
Args.AddLastArg(CmdArgs, options::OPT_finline_max_stacksize_EQ);
+ // FIXME: Find a better way to determine whether we are in C++20.
+ bool HaveCxx20 =
+ Std &&
+ (Std->contain
@@ -6870,8 +6852,38 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
Args.AddLastArg(CmdArgs, options::OPT_finline_max_stacksize_EQ);
+ // FIXME: Find a better way to determine whether we are in C++20.
+ bool HaveCxx20 =
+ Std &&
+ (Std->contain
@@ -491,11 +491,19 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::calculateBraceTypes(bool
ExpectClassBody) {
SmallVector LBraceStack;
assert(Tok->is(tok::l_brace));
do {
-// Get next non-comment token.
-FormatToken *NextTok;
-do {
- NextTok = Tokens->getNextToken();
-
https://github.com/rymiel updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69473
>From 1e4e878d251b44aa68fb8bc6422a9ec4e3de4e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emilia Kond
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:03:32 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Skip PP directives when determining brace
kind
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ if @LIBUNWIND_USES_ARM_EHABI@:
if not @LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_THREADS@:
config.available_features.add('libunwind-no-threads')
+config.extra_executor_env = ""
arichardson wrote:
Agreed that would be way better, I'll see if I can get back to th
https://github.com/arichardson converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67861
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67254
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
+//===--===//
AntonRydahl wrote:
I have written a section about this in the `libc++` documentation. Do you think
the description is sufficiently detailed?
https://github.com/l
@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
+//===--===//
AntonRydahl wrote:
I have written a section about this in the `libc++` documentation. Do you think
the description is sufficiently detailed?
https://github.com/l
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ def err_invalid_branch_protection_spec : Error<
"invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '%0'">;
def warn_unsupported_branch_protection_spec : Warning<
"unsupported branch protection specification '%0'">,
InGroup;
+def warn_attribute_und
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+py -3 git-clang-format %*
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
What is `py`? I have no program called `py` on my machine (Windows with msys2),
so you would possibly break that? Why not write `python` or `python3`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/6
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
I have no real opinion on this matter, as I don't use that program/script. But
when it helps the windows users, why not? I also see no harm.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
5chmidti wrote:
Well, I have two more PRs planned for this check :). If you feel like it, you
can merge this.
I've checked to see if anyone from the main file's git blame (of functional
changes) are active (`involves:abc` search for issues and prs), but they aren't
really. The most recent invo
https://github.com/urnathan edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/urnathan ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Nathan Sidwell (urnathan)
Changes
If the source path contains 'alias' this would spuriously fail. Be more
specific about not wanting [no]alias annotations.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69739.diff
1 Files Aff
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ def err_invalid_branch_protection_spec : Error<
"invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '%0'">;
def warn_unsupported_branch_protection_spec : Warning<
"unsupported branch protection specification '%0'">,
InGroup;
+def warn_attribute_und
@@ -5910,6 +5910,51 @@ static void handleBuiltinAliasAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
D->addAttr(::new (S.Context) BuiltinAliasAttr(S.Context, AL, Ident));
}
+static void handlePreferredTypeAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ if (!AL.hasParsedType()) {
+S.Diag(AL.get
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+py -3 git-clang-format %*
llvm-beanz wrote:
`py.exe` is the Windows python launcher. It comes with Python for Windows (not
msys2 or cygwin where the shebang line would work). It is the Windows way of
choosing which python version you want. You ne
Author: 5chmidti
Date: 2023-10-20T21:28:02+02:00
New Revision: 9399094586aa803fb399ae508e5aa46c8728fdd6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9399094586aa803fb399ae508e5aa46c8728fdd6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9399094586aa803fb399ae508e5aa46c8728fdd6.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69207
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -180,8 +180,9 @@ static void appendSubframeworkPaths(Module *Mod,
OptionalFileEntryRef ModuleMap::findHeader(
Module *M, const Module::UnresolvedHeaderDirective &Header,
SmallVectorImpl &RelativePathName, bool &NeedsFramework) {
- // Search for the header file withi
jansvoboda11 wrote:
Our downstream test `ClangScanDeps/modules-include-tree-prefix-map.c` started
failing, so CC'ing @benlangmuir to take another look.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68023
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104
>From 976aa5c8f3d936a15e7123069a49d97ad3bf7a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 13:14:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [clang] Add clang::debug_info_type attribute
---
cla
@@ -5910,6 +5910,51 @@ static void handleBuiltinAliasAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D,
D->addAttr(::new (S.Context) BuiltinAliasAttr(S.Context, AL, Ident));
}
+static void handlePreferredTypeAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ if (!AL.hasParsedType()) {
+S.Diag(AL.get
Author: Björn Schäpers
Date: 2023-10-20T21:46:40+02:00
New Revision: a95d4b795018199c1ed18f518f940b3a57b2e98a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a95d4b795018199c1ed18f518f940b3a57b2e98a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a95d4b795018199c1ed18f518f940b3a57b2e98a.diff
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69707
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> > However, will this actually work in practice in the debugger? If not,
> > perhaps we should limit to just integer and enumeration types for now,
> > leaving the extension for the future.
>
> I composed an example of that:
>
> ```c++
> struct A {
> short a1;
> short a
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104
>From 976aa5c8f3d936a15e7123069a49d97ad3bf7a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 13:14:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang] Add clang::debug_info_type attribute
---
cla
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ def err_invalid_branch_protection_spec : Error<
"invalid or misplaced branch protection specification '%0'">;
def warn_unsupported_branch_protection_spec : Warning<
"unsupported branch protection specification '%0'">,
InGroup;
+def warn_attribute_und
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2023-10-20T15:52:07-04:00
New Revision: 1d4601a1ef84e4ffe2db84d17b53953b25699eef
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d4601a1ef84e4ffe2db84d17b53953b25699eef
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d4601a1ef84e4ffe2db84d17b53953b25699eef.diff
LO
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67254
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
brad0 wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68656
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104
>From 976aa5c8f3d936a15e7123069a49d97ad3bf7a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 13:14:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [clang] Add clang::debug_info_type attribute
---
cla
EricWF wrote:
I'm tempted to just do the non-conforming thing here (because -fno-exceptions
is non-conforming), and just assume that when you're building with
-fno-exceptions, you're not trying to replace the throwing operator new, and
you'll be fine if we have the throwing kind call the non-
@@ -180,8 +180,9 @@ static void appendSubframeworkPaths(Module *Mod,
OptionalFileEntryRef ModuleMap::findHeader(
Module *M, const Module::UnresolvedHeaderDirective &Header,
SmallVectorImpl &RelativePathName, bool &NeedsFramework) {
- // Search for the header file withi
https://github.com/rmaz updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68023
>From 5e3c6319c6a98a07dab6571f65ad1320815d76bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Howell
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:10:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] add module builtin headers relative to resource dir
When inc
EricWF wrote:
> We currently support both ways of building the library (-fexceptions and
> -fno-exceptions). I don't know how widely used the -fno-exceptions variant is
> used and we could discuss dropping it (and forcing people to always build the
> library itself with -fexceptions), but IMO
https://github.com/xingxue-ibm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69767
This PR adds `static_cast` to the value returned from `getLR()` in the AIX
unwinder to avoid warning if `-Wconversion` is specified for building in 32-bit
mode.
>From 2255e2c9a66420bba36bf4ba7f3d8db36d7e4df
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: None (xingxue-ibm)
Changes
This PR adds `static_cast` to the value returned from `getLR()` in the AIX
unwinder to avoid warning if `-Wconversion` is specified for building in 32-bit
mode.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
Endilll wrote:
> but I also see "you got what you asked for!" as being a reasonable defense to
> that.
That's my thinking indeed, and the reason why I opposed to Aaron's proposal to
implicitly mark 1-bit bit-fields as `preferred_type(bool)`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104
___
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ian Anderson
Date: 2023-10-20T13:23:34-07:00
New Revision: 09ec0004eee2d9929d25cf519956cc470ffb33dd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09ec0004eee2d9929d25cf519956cc470ffb33dd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/09ec0004eee2d9929d25cf519956cc470ffb33dd.diff
https://github.com/ian-twilightcoder closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ bool UnclusteredHighRPStage::initGCNSchedStage() {
if (!GCNSchedStage::initGCNSchedStage())
return false;
- if (DAG.RegionsWithHighRP.none() && DAG.RegionsWithExcessRP.none())
+ if (DAG.RegionsWithExcessRP.none())
jrbyrnes wrote:
W
https://github.com/jrbyrnes commented:
Just have a few questions about implementation details -- at a higher level,
seems like we are trading one heuristic for another w.r.t flagging regions as
ExcessRP -- so I'm curious about the relative performance.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
@@ -1117,16 +1118,23 @@ bool
OccInitialScheduleStage::shouldRevertScheduling(unsigned WavesAfter) {
bool UnclusteredHighRPStage::shouldRevertScheduling(unsigned WavesAfter) {
// If RP is not reduced in the unclustered reschedule stage, revert to the
// old schedule.
- if
@@ -959,16 +970,6 @@ void GCNSchedStage::checkScheduling() {
<< DAG.MinOccupancy << ".\n");
}
- unsigned MaxVGPRs = ST.getMaxNumVGPRs(MF);
- unsigned MaxSGPRs = ST.getMaxNumSGPRs(MF);
- if (PressureAfter.getVGPRNum(false) > MaxVGPRs ||
- Pressur
@@ -894,10 +894,22 @@ void GCNSchedStage::setupNewBlock() {
void GCNSchedStage::finalizeGCNRegion() {
DAG.Regions[RegionIdx] = std::pair(DAG.RegionBegin, DAG.RegionEnd);
- DAG.RescheduleRegions[RegionIdx] = false;
jrbyrnes wrote:
Why was this removed?
htt
https://github.com/jrbyrnes commented:
Just have a few questions about implementation details -- at a higher level,
seems like we are trading one heuristic for another w.r.t flagging regions as
ExcessRP -- so I'm curious about the relative performance.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/jrbyrnes commented:
Just have a few questions about implementation details -- at a higher level,
seems like we are trading one heuristic for another w.r.t flagging regions as
ExcessRP -- so I'm curious about the relative performance.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69228
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
brad0 wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69134
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/robozati created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
The `RawStringLiteral` code action runs both on C and C++ versions prior to
C++11, where this feature is unavailable.
This patch adds a condition to check if the context is running a version equal
or greater t
https://github.com/robozati edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Martin Storsjö
Date: 2023-10-20T23:34:28+03:00
New Revision: 538b7ba2aacd6e400ee63c4f9ff1c2543ae69a90
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/538b7ba2aacd6e400ee63c4f9ff1c2543ae69a90
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/538b7ba2aacd6e400ee63c4f9ff1c2543ae69a90.diff
mstorsjo wrote:
> ```c
> #if !defined(LLVM_BUILD_SHARED_LIBS)
> ```
>
> is not great but is not too bad. `-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on` modes are slow to
> execute tests and are not used often for Release builds.
I went ahead and relanded this now, in
538b7ba2aacd6e400ee63c4f9ff1c2543ae69a90, with
https://github.com/robozati updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
>From c644be1d123769395bed6ea069a45c051e3fc66d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: robozati <139823421+roboz...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:23:21 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix RawStringLiteral
https://github.com/xingxue-ibm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xingxue-ibm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xingxue-ibm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: ziqingluo-90
Date: 2023-10-20T14:27:14-07:00
New Revision: a4323586fcbb20f39f00d5d1bc4a94a1aeea15c4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4323586fcbb20f39f00d5d1bc4a94a1aeea15c4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a4323586fcbb20f39f00d5d1bc4a94a1aeea15c4.diff
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rGa4323586fcbb: [-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Add AST info to the
unclaimed DRE debug notes for… (authored by ziqingluo-90).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm
https://github.com/shraiysh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
>From cf9e3e16a8b6f56e76c725b6244154b825cc8cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shraiysh Vaishay
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:59:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP][mlir] Add translation for `if` in `omp.teams`
This
https://github.com/shraiysh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
>From cf9e3e16a8b6f56e76c725b6244154b825cc8cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shraiysh Vaishay
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:59:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP][mlir] Add translation for `if` in `omp.teams`
This
dankm wrote:
No _good_ particular reason. I got hung up on the formatting issues then ran
out of steam, and busy with $job. I just ran clang-format on this change and it
came up clean.
And now that I've done that the only reason I have left is I'm unable to merge
my own changes. Would you min
robozati wrote:
Tests are randomly failing, let me get what is wrong.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/robozati converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shraiysh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
>From cf9e3e16a8b6f56e76c725b6244154b825cc8cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shraiysh Vaishay
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:59:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [OpenMP][mlir] Add translation for `if` in `omp.teams`
T
https://github.com/shraiysh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
>From cf9e3e16a8b6f56e76c725b6244154b825cc8cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shraiysh Vaishay
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:59:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [OpenMP][mlir] Add translation for `if` in `omp.teams`
T
https://github.com/shraiysh closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shraiysh closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69404
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/robozati updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
>From c644be1d123769395bed6ea069a45c051e3fc66d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: robozati <139823421+roboz...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:23:21 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix RawStringLiteral
https://github.com/robozati ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69649
>From 0c57e45f6ee16e43cc6388b1ca6beb88bbc7b925 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zijunzhao
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:23:03 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Update stdckdint.h and make it available in pre-C23
modes.
https://github.com/arichardson updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67201
>From 6d650b781080d46ccae02793529cf63b18859f3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Richardson
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 11:41:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [libunwind][libc++][libc++abi] Add cross-compilation
fl
dankm wrote:
Hm. I have "fixup" commits in this branch, should I rebase those, or can we
squash merge as-is?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65812
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ config.substitutions.append(('%{flags}',
'-isysroot {}'.format('@CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT@') if '@CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT@' else
''
))
config.substitutions.append(('%{compile_flags}',
-'-nostdinc++ -I %{include} -I %{libcxx}/test/support'
+'@CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_
https://github.com/EricWF edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
EricWF wrote:
We also don't want to make our test suite flags beholden to changes CMake
chooses to make.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
jansvoboda11 wrote:
> Clang part looks fine. For a clang-tidy part, is there a way to test this
> part ? What changes because we use now a absolute build directory. I'm
> missing some tests for that part.
So the clang-tidy part is necessary to keep the
`clang-tidy/infrastructure/clang-tidy-ru
https://github.com/mehnadnerd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69685
>From d412fa8018ff4788c3ed8a1c8018c293be20040f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:16:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV][MC] MC layer support for the experimental zalasr
extension
---
mehnadnerd wrote:
I've updated it to add regression tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69685
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -70,29 +88,45 @@ std::optional isRefCountable(const CXXRecordDecl* R)
if (!R)
return std::nullopt;
- if (hasPublicRefAndDeref(R))
+ bool hasRef = hasPublicRefMethod(R);
+ bool hasDeref = hasPublicDerefMethod(R);
+ if (hasRef && hasDeref)
return true;
CXX
@@ -18,24 +18,26 @@ using namespace clang;
namespace {
-bool hasPublicRefAndDeref(const CXXRecordDecl *R) {
+bool hasPublicRefMethod(const CXXRecordDecl *R) {
assert(R);
assert(R->hasDefinition());
- bool hasRef = false;
- bool hasDeref = false;
for (const CXXMet
201 - 300 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
