I haven't looked at the patch. If this is guarded behind NOT
LIBCXX_STANDALONE_BUILD checks, then it's probably fine.
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 21:36, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
> This doesn’t match up with what beanz said. While I assume Duncan is the
> final word, can we get some confirmation from
It’s not, but the point is we’re already skirting the line
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:37 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
wrote:
> I haven't looked at the patch. If this is guarded behind NOT
> LIBCXX_STANDALONE_BUILD checks, then it's probably fine.
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 21:36, Zachary Turner wrote
mstorsjo created this revision.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38576
Files:
docs/index.rst
Index: docs/index.rst
===
--- docs/index.rst
+++ docs/index.rst
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
LinuxARM Clang, GCC EHABI
Bare M
101 - 103 of 103 matches
Mail list logo