Ah, hmm - we do use this technique in a few places. Oh, right - protected
in the base, final derived classes (maybe that's the missing element?). So
I think we've disabled whatever GCC warnings get in the way of that
particular cliche.
But, fair enough - thanks for the context. All power to the MS
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:55 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Does that actually need a virtual dtor? The type erasure handling in
> shared_ptr would handle it so long as each instance is constructed with the
> derived type (looks like it probably is - make
Does that actually need a virtual dtor? The type erasure handling in
shared_ptr would handle it so long as each instance is constructed with the
derived type (looks like it probably is - make_shared used consistently) &
we should get a warning (or could make the base dtor protected non-virtual
to e
Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Sep 12 01:51:11 2016
New Revision: 281198
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=281198&view=rev
Log:
Add virtual destructor (necessary due to the switch to shared_ptr).
Modified:
cfe/trunk/utils/TableGen/ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/utils/Ta
