On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:36:01PM -0700, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
> > Hi Joerg,
> >
> > > Given that bzero is pretty much non-standard at this point, I strongly
> > > dislike the approach of checking only the functio
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:36:01PM -0700, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> > Given that bzero is pretty much non-standard at this point, I strongly
> > dislike the approach of checking only the function name.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. bzero it's widely used though, I think it's a
> u
Hi Joerg,
> Given that bzero is pretty much non-standard at this point, I strongly
> dislike the approach of checking only the function name.
Thanks for the feedback. bzero it's widely used though, I think it's a
usability win to perform a diagnostic here, despite bzero being
non-standard.
Is th
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:34:47PM -, Bruno Cardoso Lopes via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Author: bruno
> Date: Wed Aug 10 13:34:47 2016
> New Revision: 278264
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278264&view=rev
> Log:
> Reapply [Sema] Add sizeof diagnostics for bzero
Given that bzero
Author: bruno
Date: Wed Aug 10 13:34:47 2016
New Revision: 278264
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278264&view=rev
Log:
Reapply [Sema] Add sizeof diagnostics for bzero
Reapply r277787. For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct st
