Fixed in: r277206 after review in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22970
From: Keane, Erich
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 11:58 AM
To: 'Andrey Bokhanko' ; Mike Aizatsky
Cc: cfe-commits
Subject: RE: r277134 - [GCC] Support for __final specifier
Sure, looking into it now.
From: Andre
Sure, looking into it now.
From: Andrey Bokhanko [mailto:andreybokha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 11:57 AM
To: Mike Aizatsky ; Keane, Erich
Cc: cfe-commits
Subject: Re: r277134 - [GCC] Support for __final specifier
Mike,
Thanks for letting me know.
I committed a patch authored by
Mike,
Thanks for letting me know.
I committed a patch authored by Erich (CCed); Erich, could you, please,
investigate?
Yours,
Andrey
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Mike Aizatsky wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> This change breaks the bot:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fa
Andrey,
This change breaks the bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/15093
==15371==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x733784d in
clang::Parser::ParseOptionalCXX11VirtSpecifierSeq(clang::VirtSpecifiers&,
bool, clang::SourceLocation)
Author: asbokhan
Date: Fri Jul 29 05:42:48 2016
New Revision: 277134
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=277134&view=rev
Log:
[GCC] Support for __final specifier
As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports "final" functionality in pre-C++11 code
using the __final keyword. Clang currently sup
