r276489. Thanks!
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Richard Smith
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, George Burgess IV <
> george.burgess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> (Assuming "yes" :) )
>>
>> Richard, are you okay with this being merged into 3.9?
>>
>
> Yes, LGTM for 3.9.
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, George Burgess IV <
george.burgess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (Assuming "yes" :) )
>
> Richard, are you okay with this being merged into 3.9?
>
Yes, LGTM for 3.9.
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:54 AM, George Burgess IV <
> george.burgess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Error
(Assuming "yes" :) )
Richard, are you okay with this being merged into 3.9?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:54 AM, George Burgess IV <
george.burgess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Error message says r272936 had the error, so it looks like it would,
> yeah. :)
>
> Would you like me to merge it to the 3.9 bran
Error message says r272936 had the error, so it looks like it would, yeah.
:)
Would you like me to merge it to the 3.9 branch?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> Does this apply to 3.9?
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:28 PM, George Burgess IV via cfe-commits
> wrote:
> > Au
Does this apply to 3.9?
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:28 PM, George Burgess IV via cfe-commits
wrote:
> Author: gbiv
> Date: Wed Jul 20 22:28:13 2016
> New Revision: 276232
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276232&view=rev
> Log:
> [Sema] Fix PR28623.
>
> In atomic builtins, we assume
Author: gbiv
Date: Wed Jul 20 22:28:13 2016
New Revision: 276232
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276232&view=rev
Log:
[Sema] Fix PR28623.
In atomic builtins, we assumed that the LValue conversion on the first
argument would succeed. So, we would crash given code like:
```
void ovl(c
