Re: r266645 - [Parser][ObjC] Make sure c++11 in-class initialization is done when the

2016-04-18 Thread Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits
Thanks for catching this, r266706. > On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits > mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Author: ahatanak > Date: Mon Apr 18 13:19:45 2016 > New Revision: 266645 > > URL: http://l

Re: r266645 - [Parser][ObjC] Make sure c++11 in-class initialization is done when the

2016-04-18 Thread Richard Smith via cfe-commits
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: ahatanak > Date: Mon Apr 18 13:19:45 2016 > New Revision: 266645 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=266645&view=rev > Log: > [Parser][ObjC] Make sure c++11 in-class initial

r266645 - [Parser][ObjC] Make sure c++11 in-class initialization is done when the

2016-04-18 Thread Akira Hatanaka via cfe-commits
Author: ahatanak Date: Mon Apr 18 13:19:45 2016 New Revision: 266645 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=266645&view=rev Log: [Parser][ObjC] Make sure c++11 in-class initialization is done when the constructor's definition is in an implementation block. Without this commit, ptr doesn't g