Re: r253909 - Make clang_Cursor_getMangling not mangle if the declaration isn't mangled

2016-05-31 Thread Ehsan Akhgari via cfe-commits
Of course, apologies for this. Reverted in r271291 and recommitted in r271292. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:18 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > Burt Wesarg points out on cfe-dev that this commit message doesn't match > the patch (nor the description provided in the code review thread that lead > to thi

Re: r253909 - Make clang_Cursor_getMangling not mangle if the declaration isn't mangled

2016-05-31 Thread David Blaikie via cfe-commits
Burt Wesarg points out on cfe-dev that this commit message doesn't match the patch (nor the description provided in the code review thread that lead to this commit) - this one might be worth reverting and recommitting with a more accurate commit message (I don't usually suggest this for most commit

r253909 - Make clang_Cursor_getMangling not mangle if the declaration isn't mangled

2015-11-23 Thread Ehsan Akhgari via cfe-commits
Author: ehsan Date: Mon Nov 23 13:56:46 2015 New Revision: 253909 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=253909&view=rev Log: Make clang_Cursor_getMangling not mangle if the declaration isn't mangled Right now clang_Cursor_getMangling will attempt to mangle any declaration, even if the decl