Re: [PATCH] D27683: Prepare PrettyStackTrace for LLDB adoption

2016-12-19 Thread David Blaikie via cfe-commits
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:39 AM Sean Callanan wrote: > That would require making LLDB crash and collecting the relevant crash log > data out of the user's own logs. This isn't impossible – but additionally > the generation of that log is asynchronous and you don't quite know when > it'll land. >

Re: [PATCH] D27683: Prepare PrettyStackTrace for LLDB adoption

2016-12-19 Thread Sean Callanan via cfe-commits
That would require making LLDB crash and collecting the relevant crash log data out of the user's own logs. This isn't impossible – but additionally the generation of that log is asynchronous and you don't quite know when it'll land. Would you be all right with a more restricted macOS-only unit

Re: [PATCH] D27683: Prepare PrettyStackTrace for LLDB adoption

2016-12-19 Thread David Blaikie via cfe-commits
Test coverage? On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:39 PM Sean Callanan via Phabricator via cfe-commits wrote: > spyffe retitled this revision from "Fix the linkage for > __crashtracer_info__" to "Prepare PrettyStackTrace for LLDB adoption". > spyffe updated the summary for this revision. > spyffe updated