rsmith added a comment.
I don't see how this approach can work; the fact that we happened to ask the
expression evaluator to evaluate an expression is not sufficient reason for us
to issue this warning. For instance:
auto a = []{};
void (*p)() = a;
... will ask the evaluator to evaluate th
faisalv updated the summary for this revision.
faisalv updated this revision to Diff 62814.
faisalv added a comment.
Mark the lambda's conversion to function-pointer as incontrovertibly constexpr.
auto L = [](auto a) { return a; };
constexpr int* (*fp)(int*) = L; // This is now allowed.
Instead
faisalv added a comment.
*ping*
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
faisalv added a comment.
*ping*
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
faisalv added a comment.
*ping*
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18510
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
