Had a look at the C99 spec, according to section 7.18.1.1 ("Exact-width
integer types"), the types uint_t should be available in stdint.h
itself, inttypes.h on the other hand builds on stdint.h and provides more
functionality.
I don't see a particular need to include inttypes.h here?
Cheers,
/ A
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:32:24PM -, Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-commits
wrote:
> This missing include seems to cause compilation failures on older MacOS
> versions (< 10.9). This is because r270692 has introduced uint64_t into
> config.h without including this header.
But that would be inttype
Author: asiri
Date: Thu Oct 13 09:32:24 2016
New Revision: 284125
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=284125&view=rev
Log:
[libunwind] Add missing include. NFC.
This missing include seems to cause compilation failures on older MacOS
versions (< 10.9). This is because r270692 has introdu
