On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Nico Weber wrote:
> "the specified hash does not meet the Hash requirements" isn't a very
> actionable diagnostic.
>
True, For now I was only trying to out-diagnose template barf when I wrote
it initially. So in that regard it's a bit more actionable that it was,
"the specified hash does not meet the Hash requirements" isn't a very
actionable diagnostic. Is it possible to use some warning text that lets
people know what they need to do to make the compiler happy, instead of
just telling them that the compiler is unhappy?
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Eri
Author: ericwf
Date: Fri Mar 3 16:35:58 2017
New Revision: 296919
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=296919&view=rev
Log:
Fix hash requirements check in __hash_table.
r296565 attempted to add better diagnostics when an unordered container
is instantiated with a hash that doesn't meet t
