I think it should be fixed in r276200. I'll watch the bots.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> Hi Lang,
>
> Sorry about the breakage. I always forget __clang_major__ and
> __clang_minor__ are useless when dealing with apple-clang.
> Who can I complain to about that?
>
> I'll
Hi Lang,
Sorry about the breakage. I always forget __clang_major__ and
__clang_minor__ are useless when dealing with apple-clang.
Who can I complain to about that?
I'll check in a fix shortly.
/Eric
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Lang Hames wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm seeing failures on the b
Hi Eric,
I'm seeing failures on the builders that look like they're related to this
- http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-expensive/359/
Could you look in to what's going on here?
- Lang.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.l
Author: ericwf
Date: Wed Jul 20 01:36:11 2016
New Revision: 276092
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276092&view=rev
Log:
Unbreak is_constructible tests for Clang <= 3.7.
There is a bug in Clang's __is_constructible builtin that causes it
to return true for function types; ex [T = void
