frasercrmck wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
frasercrmck wrote:
@arsenm are you happy for this to be merged?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
>From 65713ca581a83261e888feb7a96c76d1525d223b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:52:51 +
Subject: [PATCH] [libclc] Move several integer functions to CLC library
Thi
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
frasercrmck wrote:
> > In this conte
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
arsenm wrote:
> In this context of t
https://github.com/karolherbst edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
karolherbst wrote:
similar here
htt
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
rjodinchr wrote:
I don't think the s
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
frasercrmck wrote:
> On the `clspv`
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
rjodinchr wrote:
On the `clspv` side
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
frasercrmck wrote:
> > I'm not sure
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
arsenm wrote:
> I'm not sure why wra
https://github.com/frasercrmck edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
frasercrmck wrote:
> > The clspv/spi
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
arsenm wrote:
> The clspv/spirv targ
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF char __clc_clz(char x) {
+ return __clc_clz((ushort)(uchar)x) - 8;
+}
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF uchar __clc_clz(uchar x) {
+ return __clc_clz((ushort)x) - 8;
+}
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF short __clc_clz(
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
frasercrmck wrote:
Oh right, I thoug
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__
+
+#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV)
+// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz
+#define __clc_clz clz
arsenm wrote:
I don't really underst
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF char __clc_clz(char x) {
+ return __clc_clz((ushort)(uchar)x) - 8;
+}
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF uchar __clc_clz(uchar x) {
+ return __clc_clz((ushort)x) - 8;
+}
+
+_CLC_OVERLOAD _CLC_DEF short __clc_clz(
https://github.com/frasercrmck edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786
This commit moves over the OpenCL clz, hadd, mad24, mad_hi, mul24, mul_hi,
popcount, rhadd, and upsample builtins to the CLC library. There are no changes
to any target's CLC libraries.
The OpenCL mad_hi b
21 matches
Mail list logo
