On 1/30/19 10:41 AM, Ilya Biryukov wrote:
> Should be fixed by r352612, let me know if it pops up again.
> This was a use after move, probably gcc and clang prefer different
> evaluation order, hence the difference in behaviours.
Awesome! Now it passes also when I compile with gcc.
Thanks,
Mik
Should be fixed by r352612, let me know if it pops up again.
This was a use after move, probably gcc and clang prefer different
evaluation order, hence the difference in behaviours.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:12 PM Ilya Biryukov wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> I suspect an undefined value creeps in for
Hi Mikael,
I suspect an undefined value creeps in for protocol capabilities, given
that we have responses in different formats.
I'll investigate, thanks for the report!
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:05 PM Mikael Holmén
wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> I've no idea why, but when I compile this commit with gcc
Hi Ilya,
I've no idea why, but when I compile this commit with gcc (7.4.0) the
test fixits-command.test fails, and the output from clangd is rather
different from when I compile it with clang (3.6.0).
So I run
build-all/bin/clangd -lit-test <
/data/repo/master/llvm-master/tools/clang/tools/ex
Author: ibiryukov
Date: Tue Jan 29 06:17:36 2019
New Revision: 352494
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=352494&view=rev
Log:
[clangd] Interfaces for writing code tweaks
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two