kazutakahirata wrote:
> May I ask what is the reason for this change? What problem does std::unique
> have that llvm::unique solves?
- `llvm::unique(Foo)` is shorter than `std::unique(Foo.begin(), and Foo.end())`.
- `llvm::unique(Foo)` prevents us from mistakenly specifying two unrelated
itera
carlosgalvezp wrote:
May I ask what is the reason for this change? What problem does std::unique
have that llvm::unique solves?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kuhar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136514.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-doc/Representation.cpp (+2-2)
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-i
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136514
None
>From 0682a632e741dde6737e488daf8fbc01d6b2a58b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 20:36:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tools-extra] Use llvm::unique (NFC)
---
clan
