kazutakahirata wrote:
> > > I'm not sure on the false positive
> >
> >
> > It's an adjective in this case: false-positive **rate**, so I believe it's
> > correct, even though English is not my native language. ChatGPT also claims
> > it's correct
>
> Adjective seems legit, but e.g.
> [Wikip
vbvictor wrote:
I'm not sure on the `false positive` -> `false-positive` change.
We typically use `false positive`, you could grep docs or look at [release
notes](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/21.x/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149831.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/Contributing.rst (+36-36)
``diff
diff --git a/cl
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149831
None
>From 47082aa41dd5c3f17f313766951bd7d826715bae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 07:53:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Proofread Contributing.rst
---
.../doc
