[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-06-03 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote: ### Merge activity * **Jun 3, 4:36 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via [Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/142209). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142209 _

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-06-03 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142209 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-06-02 Thread Erick Velez via cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142209 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-05-30 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142209 When we landed the fix for the assertion in #141990, we hadn't yet reduced the test case sufficiently for a regression test. >From b541800f007dd538d2aead1b514bbe55c175d0ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Kir

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-05-30 Thread Paul Kirth via cfe-commits
ilovepi wrote: * **#142209** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/142209?utm_source=stack-comment-icon"; target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite" width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/1422

[clang-tools-extra] [clang-doc] Add test case for #141990 (PR #142209)

2025-05-30 Thread via cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi) Changes When we landed the fix for the assertion in #141990, we hadn't yet reduced the test case sufficiently for a regression test. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142209.diff 1