llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-win` running on
`as-worker-93` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/146/builds/477
Here is the relevant
https://github.com/jpienaar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99770
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99770
>From ee91900dd42321ce1344a70df5f1baddf36bde9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:25:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][clang] Move RewriterBuffer to ADT.
These classes are n
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
Works for me! IIUC nobody touched this code in a while, and that's probably
because it's basically perfect for everyone's existing purposes. So I think
moving it to ADT is appropriate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99770
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jacques Pienaar (jpienaar)
Changes
These classes are not specific to clang and useful for other rewriter tools
(flagged in previous review).
---
Patch is 91.29 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://github.com/jpienaar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99770
These classes are not specific to clang and useful for other rewriter tools
(flagged in previous review).
>From 451a4c61066c4a433bc100ebc511dc6447f83ab0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques Pienaar
Date: Sat
