https://github.com/gedare closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
The improved fix is in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124891.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
I'll rebase on the other PR after it merges.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/gedare reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/gedare closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gedare wrote:
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124891.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2633,12 +2633,20 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
PreviousNotConst->MatchingParen->Previous->isNot(tok::kw_template);
}
-if ((PreviousNotConst->is(tok::r_paren) &&
- PreviousNotConst->is(TT_TypeDeclarationParen)) ||
-PreviousNotConst->is(TT
@@ -2633,12 +2633,20 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
PreviousNotConst->MatchingParen->Previous->isNot(tok::kw_template);
}
-if ((PreviousNotConst->is(tok::r_paren) &&
- PreviousNotConst->is(TT_TypeDeclarationParen)) ||
-PreviousNotConst->is(TT
https://github.com/gedare updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
>From 5292f110ce4c7f5b060165e3c3f817b6716c2c1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gedare Bloom
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:49:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix annotating attrs in class/struct
An attrib
gedare wrote:
> I'd add an annotating test. (And drop the formatting test.)
Yes, that's a good idea, I've done it. I started with the formatting test, but
it is unnecessary (although a good, complicated bit of formatting) since the
bug was in the annotation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> (Why drop the formatting test? Seems good to have an integration test for
> this, no?)
Because the bug was a misannotation. The formatting, based on the annotations,
should already be covered. Of course one can always add more tests, and I'm not
demanding to remove
nico wrote:
(Why drop the formatting test? Seems good to have an integration test for this,
no?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c
12 matches
Mail list logo