tstellar wrote:
Tracking the backport request here: #81096
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#81096
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
/cherry-pick 8f6e13e6da84
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: clang-format -assume-filename=foo.m -dump-config | FileCheck %s
owenca wrote:
Yes, because it wouldn't make a difference before and after the patch. I don't
think we can use lit to test that behavior (i.e., not waiting for an EOF) of
cl
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: clang-format -assume-filename=foo.m -dump-config | FileCheck %s
bhamiltoncx wrote:
It looks like you reverted the lit test which just runs `clang-format
-dump-config` without any other arguments. Is that what you wanted to do?
https://
https://github.com/bhamiltoncx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+// RUN: clang-format -dump-config 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
bhamiltoncx wrote:
Can you also add a test with `clang-format --assume-filename=foo.m -dump-config
2>&1 | FileCheck %s`?
It should result in `Language: ObjC`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
https://github.com/bhamiltoncx approved this pull request.
Looks good. Can you add one more test, please?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
>From d49f94ca7de184fb7859a2d6d3f85e9b9adcc041 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 18:29:42 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fix a regression in dumping the config
Commit d813af
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Commit d813af73f70f addressed a regression introduced by commit 3791b3fca6ea
but caused `clang-format -dump-config` to "hang".
This patch reverts changes to ClangFormat.cpp by both 3791b3fca6ea and
d813af73
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80628
Commit d813af73f70f addressed a regression introduced by commit 3791b3fca6ea
but caused `clang-format -dump-config` to "hang".
This patch reverts changes to ClangFormat.cpp by both 3791b3fca6ea and
d813af73f70f an
13 matches
Mail list logo