llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/15781
Here is th
https://github.com/Prabhuk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129920
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rnk approved this pull request.
Thanks, I spent a while thinking if this was correct, and then convincing
myself that we ignore the relevant calling conventions on the appropriate
platforms (we ignore `__fastcall` on x64 and ignore `__vectorcall` on Win ARM).
https://github.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Prabhuk (Prabhuk)
Changes
Instead of hardcoding the decision on what mangling scheme to use based
on targets, use TargetInfo to make the decision.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129920.diff
4 Files Affected:
-
https://github.com/Prabhuk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129920
Instead of hardcoding the decision on what mangling scheme to use based
on targets, use TargetInfo to make the decision.
>From 50204fcef930b215c9494b92b8c54a19d3821d5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: prabhukr
D
