tigbr wrote:
@steakhal As we have discussed in person, unfortunately, I could not reproduce
the big improvements for the three problematic translation units.
On the bright side, however, I was able to reproduce an average improvement
between 0.5% and 1%. This is in the ballpark that I have mea
steakhal wrote:
Any news on this front?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
I had a look at the spreadsheet and the numbers for `linux-topro.c` looks
really impressive.
However, in general, we need further investigation about why are we not getting
faster e.g. in the `clang-MSP430ISelDAGToDAG.cpp` case. The direction seems
right though.
(FYI it usuall
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
