hiraditya wrote:
Ah that's unfortunate.; sorry about that. In my local copy of git log (before
merging)
```
commit 5b85613483861b3734edf9c94be390f2b3b0dd2a (HEAD -> riscv_tsan)
Author: Alex Fan
Date: Fri Oct 6 12:32:38 2023 -0700
```
so i thought github would respect that.
https://github.c
MaskRay wrote:
> > The review context is on
> > [reviews.llvm.org/D145214](https://reviews.llvm.org/D145214) . Moving it
> > here just causes more confusion.
> > @alexfanqi is the author of the patch and they can drive a reland.
>
> Can you elaborate what is confusing? The patch was already re
https://github.com/hiraditya closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexfanqi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hiraditya updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
>From 5b85613483861b3734edf9c94be390f2b3b0dd2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Fan
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:32:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] add support for riscv64
Implements for sv39 and sv48 VMA layout.
Us
https://github.com/hiraditya updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
>From bcd63227792a992d6e5cd851d2fa2355d2f3c4f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Fan
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:32:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [TSAN] add support for riscv64
Implements for sv39 and sv48 VMA layo
https://github.com/alexfanqi requested changes to this pull request.
I missed a little piece for sv48 here
```
--- a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform.h
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform.h
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
#define SANITIZER_MMAP_RANGE_SIZE FIRST_3
alexfanqi wrote:
Sorry. It took some time to reply. Since newer linux kernel supports sv57 and
sv48, I tested this again with latest qemu and 6.6 kernel, by passing `-cpu
rv64,sv48=on` to qemu.
I missed a little piece here for sv48,
Also to note, if we want to support sv57, we could directly
hiraditya wrote:
> The review context is on https://reviews.llvm.org/D145214 . Moving it here
> just causes more confusion.
>
> @alexfanqi is the author of the patch and they can drive a reland.
Can you elaborate what is confusing? The patch was already reviewed and
accepted. I'm waiting on t
https://github.com/MaskRay requested changes to this pull request.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145214#4653647
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
MaskRay wrote:
The review context is on https://reviews.llvm.org/D145214 . Moving it here just
causes more confusion.
@alexfanqi is the author of the patch and they can drive a reland.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/zeroomega approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Please solve the code-formatting issues complaint by the bots.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 08545e85167a105b8147d76a48a2fa1eac0f9e9a
512ba7677b5b6656fab25f5c2b31a1ef203d9756 --
https://github.com/hiraditya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: AdityaK (hiraditya)
Changes
Implements for sv39 and sv48 VMA layout.
Userspace only has access to the bottom half of vma range. The top half is used
by kernel. There is no dedicated vsyscall or heap segment.
PIE program is allocated to st
https://github.com/hiraditya created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68735
Implements for sv39 and sv48 VMA layout.
Userspace only has access to the bottom half of vma range. The top half is used
by kernel. There is no dedicated vsyscall or heap segment.
PIE program is allocated to s
16 matches
Mail list logo