https://github.com/vtjnash updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122330
>From 829e1c89ce869f782cb802a1d618003770c0d074 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jameson Nash
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:10:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Sema] do not destruct fields of unions
The C++ standard proh
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for the fix! The changes look correct to me, but I added the CFG and
Analysis maintainers to give a final sign-off. Can you also add something to
`clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst` so users know about the fix?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
gbaraldi wrote:
Bump.
For reference, this is holding julia to an older LLVM version than needed ;)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122330
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
vtjnash wrote:
This roughly corresponds to 921bd20dddf5080cdb36f39c0162eb63b2d5325e in Sema, I
think (@zygoloid). Maybe @tkremenek or @yronglin has done something in this
part of the code recently too as reviewers and to merge this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122330
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Jameson Nash (vtjnash)
Changes
The C++ standard prohibits this implicit destructor call, leading to incorrect
reports from clang-analyzer. This causes projects that use std::option
(including llvm) to fail the cplusplus.NewDelete
https://github.com/vtjnash created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122330
The C++ standard prohibits this implicit destructor call, leading to incorrect
reports from clang-analyzer. This causes projects that use std::option
(including llvm) to fail the cplusplus.NewDelete test incorr
