On 1/6/2017 3:05 PM, Andrew Rogers wrote:
Hi,
This is a (tested!) patch to add checks that both pre-increment and
pre-decrement don’t overflow, for both char and short integer types
(since they’re both narrower than int), as per the problem fixed in
PR9350.
r291805.
-Eli
--
Employee o
]
Sent: 4 January 2017 6:42 pm
To: andrew.rog...@cantab.net; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Testcase for LLVM PR9350
On 1/3/2017 2:28 PM, via cfe-dev wrote:
Hi clang devs,
I was looking at PR9350 and saw that Eli added a test to check LLVM doesn't
overflow on [signed]
